• abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Time for me to say this again:

    THE WEIGHT LIMIT ON LUGGAGE IS TO PROTECT BAGGAGE HANDLERS FROM INJURY. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TAKE OFF OR LANDING WEIGHT.

    • bobzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If that’s all it is, then just slap a bright red tag on the over weight bags to warn the handlers. Right?

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Now every single bag is overweight and they have to lift all of them all day. I suspect a few is ok but they really want to discourage too many of them so they are not lifting too many heavy weights all day.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “Any time you think it’s not about the money, it’s about the money.”

    Mahatma Gandhi
    
  • neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Can I get the exact same picture but with an obese fat woman and a sexy male athlete, please? Or would that be inappropriate?

  • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Tell ya what. Make it as easy for me to pop off a pound as it is for someone else to take a hair dryer out of their luggage and I will happily pay for all the extra boobs I bring on board after I remove the weight everywhere else.

  • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    How is that logical that the man should pay extra cause he’s bigger/taller but small people should get extra luggage bonus?

    Not even taking into account that this very short lady will be far more comfortable during the flight than the gentleman.

    • Splenetic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Its not logical - Weight limits aren’t there for the flight, they’re there so the luggage handlers don’t injure themselves

      • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Of course… What airline companies are most concerned about is the well being of their luggage handlers.

        Even if they claim that this is one of the reasons, it’s a by product of cost management.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Weight limits are critical for the flight. An overweight plane can fail to take off. The more weight in passengers a plane carries, the more weight in fuel they need to add. This extra fuel weight also requires more fuel to carry it. And so on and so on.

        There’s a tipping point with weight of passengers and cargo combined with flight duration where the plane becomes uneconomical to fly. Planes have crashed on takeoff because they were overweight but the weight was miscalculated. Temperature and weather also play a role.

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Adding to that, people need to load all those suitcases in. The man doesn’t get carried into the plane.

    • FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The logic being that there is ~$0.82 USD per KG of fuel cost that has to be accounted for

  • Sibshops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    239
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I don’t know why this keeps getting posted everywhere. Workers have a lift limit the extra cost is for the extra person to handle the bag.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’d also suspect humans on a plane will follow a normal distribution in terms of weight. The aircraft weight/loading is done on an average sized person (which used to be 75kg if I remember correctly). Conversely every motherfucker will load their luggage with as much shit as possible if it’s not limited.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Who gets the money for that extra work?

          If baggage handlers were paid the extra bag fee people would be queuing round the airport to work there…

          • bob_lemon@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            If the airport needs more baggage handlers on staff because there’s heavy 2 person luggage or just more luggage, they indirectly do get the money, because that’s how wages work.

            Although I’m sure that the airline will pocket some of the fee, which is obviously not cool, but that’s capitalism for you.

        • mogranja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Apparently a standard carry on is about 45 cm³, or 1.60 ft³. If you fill it with water, that would weigh about 45kg/100 lb.

          That would be a lot of 100ml containers…

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Depends on how shitty the company is. I’ve seen it a few times in a couple of decades of travel tbh

          • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            In all airports that I’ve been through (all in Europe), the scanners for people + their carry-on luggage are from the customs agency, so from the government. They won’t check or enforce any airline weight limits there. The airline may still ask to check the weight of carry-on luggage at the gate, but I’ve never seen it as an automated process, only as spot checks.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The scanner’s part of security, which is potentially shared between multiple airlines with multiple cabin bag weight limits, so it wouldn’t make sense as the place to weigh things. It only works if it’s done somewhere airline-specific, like check-in or boarding.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Hmm, perhaps. Good point, but I’ve flown enough that I should have seen someone flagged for overweight bags.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          So all suitcases between 19 and 23kg are loaded by 2 people at a time?

          Bullshit. It’s a fake cost and everyone knows it.

          • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It’s always just one guy yeeting the bags even when there’s 2 of them they never share a bag lol. The extra money pays for the pink heavy tag they put on there that no one listens to.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    OSHA.

    The throwers have a union to stop them from killing themselves, which means we don’t give them 40kg things to break their backs regularly and anything over 22kgs they buddy lift or get a hoist or something.

    Thought it was just airlines being airlines too, but this makes complete sense, don’t be dicks about other people’s health.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      21 hours ago

      i was in favor of total weight based pricing, but this changed my mind.

      may the backs of the people kicking around my luggage be in perfect health

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Same, went from ‘you greedy mother-fuckers’ to ‘I am right with you fam’.

        Amazed they don’t explain it more, it makes them actually seem human for once.

        • starchylemming@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          20 hours ago

          because airlines do not actually care about their workers and just comply with the regulations half assedly. they cannot fathom compassion for human resources or assume milking it would backfire.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I mean, airlines are people too, and among the most unionized industries.

            They’re both soulless and actually human at the same time.

  • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’ve always assumed you pay extra because multiple people have to carry the bag around after you check it, and that’s harder/more dangerous at higher weights.

    In warehouses, you gotta go get your lift belt and often a partner if something is over a certain weight, and you aren’t covered by workman’s comp if you just try to do it quickly without those, so it’s a serious hassle.

    • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I always assumed it was more about the conveyors and such your bag goes through before even getting to those folks. Heavier bags mean more wear and tear and maintenance on those machines.

      Honestly, it’s probably a little bit of both along with just deterring some cohort of people from bringing too much stuff because they don’t want to pay the fees.

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The extra fuel cost doesn’t even remotely compare to the cost of an injured baggage handler and their lost wages.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Using that logic, the extra charge doesn’t come close to the cost of an injured baggage handler and their lost wages. If that was the reason, they would reject it outright or split it into multiple bags.

          • Aphelion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Nooo… They just assign multiple people or use equipment to lift heavy bags.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Do we really expect they do that for baggage handlers? When it’s 2 pounds over. Do they mark overweight bags with big hazard signs so the handlers know?

              • Aphelion@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Yes, they do. If you’ve ever worked a physical job, there are safety procedures and regulations enforced by OSHA and unions. If it’s 2 pounds over, you go get a second person for the lift because if you decide to break procedure and then injure yourself, you’re not covered by the union and/or workman’s comp insurance. In some places it’s an automatic firing if you break safety procedure, and any manager forcing people to break procedure will be in deep shit.

                Story time: I have a good friend who was a baggage handler and got stuck in a situation where their boss forced them to handle overweight baggage without a second person. She blew out her knee, has had multiple surguries, and has had to testify in court multiple times, including for a law suit that ended up giving her a sizable settlement check.

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  No no no not other jobs. This one job specifically: airplane baggage handler. And I’m not talking massively overweight bags which sounds like your friend, I’m talking the 1 and 2 pound overweight. Are they marked with massive hazard signs so everyone knows it’s 1 pound over.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Well, no employee is going to be expected to physically lift me and every other passenger at any point, but they will have to lift all of our checked baggage, so it feels like my weight matters less than my luggage’s weight.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t want to “well actually” but I’m disabled and need to be pushed in my chair through the airport and to + down the gate corridor. Every time I arrive at the plane door, someone greets me from the plane and asks “do you need help (boarding the plane)”. Luckily I can hobble with my cane for short distances, so I don’t need to be carried like I’m going to the bedroom in a romcom, but they do have staff that can aid with that…

      Now I’m imagining a plane full of disabled people all being carried. Boarding time, 11a, departure, 3p. 😋

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        That’s fair. Now I wonder how liability works with that since they could hurt themselves and you in the process. And surely they are people that just cannot be lifted by one person.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    No matter what size you are, you can wear a jacket with as many pockets as you want. Travel cheaper by looking like an vaudeville ex-army doomsday prepper with all your underwear stuffed into pockets of oversized cargo pants, three layers of socks and an entire towel as a toga shirt over your other shirts.

    Pro-tip: If you have a greasy paper bag they’ll think it’s food and won’t charge you for a carry-on.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Dude, I barely fit in the seats now with my phone in my pocket and you want me to carry a weeks worth of clothing and travel sized toiletries on my person?

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I did that once with camera gear. I stuffed lenses in all my pockets because my carry on bag was too heavy. “There, 5 kg off, happy ?”

    • owatnext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’m always cold when flying, so I just layer up. Jeans, sweatpants, short sleeve, long sleeve, sweater, jacket, hat. Then, I put various items in my various pockets. Phone, earbuds, snack bars, bar of soap, small articles of clothing, maybe a tshirt in my jacket pocket, a shoe in each sweatpants pocket. The rest goes in my carry on, no luggage fees.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You must be the person who’s always in front of me at the line for the security scanners!

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “One second, I just need to update some details before I can give you your boarding pass…”

      types into the terminal ‘customer wouldn’t let me weigh them, probably a fat fuck, recommend full body search at security checkpoint for contraband meals and soda’

      “Here you go, sorry about the delay, have a lovely day”