• bobzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If that’s all it is, then just slap a bright red tag on the over weight bags to warn the handlers. Right?

    • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not quite.

      You know how X-Ray Techs go into a little room to protect themselves while you get your x-ray? That’s because while you are only getting one (1) x-ray, maybe two (2), they have to do tens or hundreds a day, and the raditation levels from that can cause them harm, while you getting one or two x-rays is fine.

      Now replace x-ray with your overweight bag filled with cheap Scotch you got from the Duty Free at EDI and “Radiation” with knee and back injuries from doing that over and over again for eight hours a day, and you can see why both the Unions and the Companies would object to unlimited baggage weight for passengers as workers will be out of work from injuries and companies will have to pay them compensation and find someone to replace them.

      If individual passenger weight was enough to prevent take off, then very few people would be able to fly.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Now every single bag is overweight and they have to lift all of them all day. I suspect a few is ok but they really want to discourage too many of them so they are not lifting too many heavy weights all day.

      • facelessbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I believe that after 50lbs it becomes a team lift and requires 2 people to lift the bag. Which 1 person can do but when hunched over in the belly of the plane it becomes harder and more likely to injure one’s back.