• Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sure, but only if all Americans have to work for, and live on, one year of service industry work - like waiting tables, checking out customers, or serving fast food. Especially the rich ones.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Or just make it a function of the military. A crop corps, if you will. We already have the Army Corps of Engineers. This would be just another civil function.

    After all, food independence from other states, and ensuring the security of logistics supply like food, are an important part of any military strategy.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I remember hearing that there was a similar concept in Soviet Union at some point, when normal citizens worked collecting fruits or something like that.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      8 days ago

      Spin universal healthcare as “Those damn overpayed doctors should be forced to support their nation!” and BOOM, patriotism.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          8 days ago

          Simply describe any leftist position without using charged words and I guarantee most republicans would be on board.

          My mom is “pro-life.” I interviewed her on what exactly she believed should be legislated. Turns out she’s 100% pro choice but just doesn’t like abortion.

          • saltesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Most people are like that. It’s really normal to have views from all over the spectrum, not all from one side. Many libertarians maturely face the conundrum that they will always fight for the liberties of others, even if they personally or morally disagree with them. And I’m talking about actual libertarians, not the US “libertarians” their media has.mislabelled and confused.the nation by basically redefining that term to somethung entirely different.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            Kentucky fucking hates Obamacare but if you try taking Kentuckycare (Obamacare+the optional stuff every state was offered+a convenient portal) they’ll fucking riot.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      We can do both. It will take time and strong, sustained effort. But we can do it.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Socialism/communism = “someone got something that I don’t think they deserved.”

      They’re just bad words to people. I think a lot of the “normal people” on the right are just people who are too stupid to understand politics, so it works like their football team. You don’t need to know anything about the Dallas Cowboys or Patriots to hate them. Democrats are bad because they are the other team. We don’t need to know what “woke” means - it’s just a word that describes people on the bad team.

      If you manage to avoid the trigger words, and they haven’t been propagandized on whatever specific topic, it’s really easy to convince them to agree with a lot of left leaning ideas.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah, not doing volunteer farm work to give private people and corporations free work and profit.

    If there were some state-owned ones that the food was used to feed public school kids or others on government programs, maybe.

    But no way for someone else’s profit.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Plot twist: America does agricultural collectivization in the 2030s

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        We already do, I implore you to learn how the omnibus agriculture bill that goes through congress each year actually works. Most food production is entirely government funded, but for some reason a bunch of “profits” also get skimmed off by big corporations. Rural America only exists because of farm subsidies (which isn’t a bad thing, it’s just dumb to pretend like it’s not collectivized and allow leeches to profiteer).

        • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Government subsidies are not the same thing as collectivization. Collectivization implies collective ownership, under Capitalism what you have instead is usually consolidation, where large farms buy up smaller competitors and become less efficient over time. America’s approach to agricultural policy is how you get perverse incentives like speculators buying up land in order to collect government money to not grow anything.

  • _bcron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The same people who would recommend this are the same exact people who are clutching pearls at other people coming in and taking their jobs, and also the same exact people who are least likely to have immigrants take their jobs. What do they actually want? Nobody fucking knows, not even them

  • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Will they get to keep the produce? Otherwise, this is just slavery and very much in line with conservative ideology again.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      When watching the TV Series The Handmaid Tales I kept thinking that things like their very heavy security appartus, military for the continuing seccession war and heavy use of dedicated manpower doing manual work in house chores (at least for the upper classes) would use too much manpower, taking it away from actual productive activities and thus making a modern nation level of life (in the material sense, not other senses) unsustainable, though Gilead could sorta keep going for a while drawing down on the wealth of the part of the US from were it was formed, before falling down to mid-XX century South American levels of wealth or worse.

      However temporary slavery like this “national duty field work” might actually “solve” some of the agricultural production manpower shortage problems in such a society.

      So it actually makes sense (in a sick way) that it’s appealing to the most extreme Fascist amongst the Republicans.

    • Luminocta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      Where does it say you don’t get paid?

      Also, in terms of understanding how things happen, this is definitely not a bad thing.

      So many people take everything for granted. I worked a couple of years in agriculture. Long days, tough work. I will never look down on a farmer, and it thought me some neat lessons in life too.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        8 days ago

        You get paid for jury duty. Making a living off of that? When i read national duty i heard conscription in my head. Maybe because i just assume the idea is as good as the compensation.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I worked on a farm from 23-30 and my body is kinda destroyed now. Had surgery on my wrist, my back hurts all the time. I’m getting arthritis in my fingers and knees. All at the ripe age of 36.

        It’s definitely valuable work, but there’s a reason old farmers tend to walk like Arthur Morgan.

        • Jayjader@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Call me naive, but it seems to me that if everyone was pitching in for a season of farm work, less people overall would be doing 8/15/etc consecutive years and getting their bodies destroyed.

          • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            It depends on the farm. It’s not completely unskilled labor, especially if you’re dealing with livestock or large machinery like what’s used for harvesting/spreading manure/tilling.

            Implementing something like what’s being suggested would require some sort if funding from the government to train people to get ready to do it, and honestly a lot of farmers aren’t going to want a bunch of green farmhands all at the same time. In a lot of cases it’d be more trouble than it’s worth.

            Asking someone who has never been on a farm to just jump in on an operation and be helpful is kinda setting everyone up to fail. There’s more to a farm than picking crops and cleaning up animal poop.

            I mean, something simple like fixing a fence can be a pain in the ass if you dont know what youre doing. Plus, theres a lot of ways to get hurt or killed if you’re not familiar with the environment.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Maybe in that one aspect, but I’d imagine the mandatory labor at likely very low wages will make most people resent it more than anything.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Is it better to force poor people to work in farms to survive? In a world where a large number of ‘modern’ westernized countries have active military conscription for young people, I don’t see this as being worse than that, either. The thing with slavery, is that it is lifetime, unpaid, terrible conditions, based on a feeling of superiority, only for the targeted groups, etc.

      Of course, the better solution is just to treat farm workers fairly and pay them well, and work on automation at the same time. But rich people were forced to work in farms too, the conditions would probably get a whole lot nicer for everyone involved, and it would probably create a pretty big incentive to start automation as well.

      edit: to actually be fine, it would have to be run by the govt. on nationally owned farms, like schools are, for workers to be paid and well treated, and for rich people to not be exempt

    • Jayjader@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Some choice excerpts:

      Problems arose immediately for the A-TEAM nationwide. In California’s Salinas Valley, 200 teenagers from New Mexico, Kansas and Wyoming quit after just two weeks on the job. “We worked three days and all of us are broke,” the Associated Press quoted one teen as saying. Students elsewhere staged strikes. At the end, the A-TEAM was considered a giant failure and was never tried again.

      “These [high school students] had the words and whiteness to say what they were feeling and could act out in a way that Mexican-Americans who had been living this way for decades simply didn’t have the power or space for the American public to listen to them,” [Stony Brook University history professor Lori A. Flores] says. “The students dropped out because the conditions were so atrocious, and the growers weren’t able to mask that up.”

      She says the A-TEAM “reveals a very important reality: It’s not about work ethic [for undocumented workers]. It’s about [the fact] that this labor is not meant to be done under such bad conditions and bad wages.”

      And what one dude who went through the program as a 17 year old has to say about it now:

      But he says the experience also taught them empathy toward immigrant workers that Carter says the rest of the country should learn, especially during these times.

      “There’s nothing you can say to us that [migrant laborers] are rapists or they’re lazy,” he says. "We know the work they do. And they do it all their lives, not just one summer for a couple of months. And they raise their families on it. Anyone ever talks bad on them, I always think, ‘Keep talking, buddy, because I know what the real deal is.’ "

      My reading is that it failed because there was no political will to actually provide for local-born farmers any more than immigrants. And as such, it was doomed to fail from the start.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      People in University or with University Education will “of course” be exempted from this duty which, by an amazing coincidence will exempt the scions of the rich and upper middle class.

      It’s a similar technique as what’s used in not just the US but also countries like the UK to make sure the children of “upper” classes don’t have to endure certain hardships and have enhanced future opportunities even in accessing Upper Education: it’s not at all *cough* *cough* because they’re the children of wealthy parents, it’s purelly because they frequent (expensive) private schools and the children of the poor and working class too when they frequent such schools have access to those things (the “small” detail that the poor and working class cannot actually afford it, remains unsaid).

      Whenever a Neoliberal talks about how meritocratic their system is, remember that they defend privatised education, something which as I explained above just means a two tier system were those who can afford it purchase for their children easy access past certain gatekeepers of future opportunities such as access to certain Universities whilst the rest are in a different track - the state school system - with far lower chances, all of which is the very opposite of a merit-based system.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, usa is a hyper-capitalistic country. Not all (actually none other) countries behave like this. But they all use the dollar as currency. The difference is that usa is the economic superpower but that does not make them control way the world world any longer. It disappeared when the culture war was lost. The war on drug was lost too and now there is a class war. Wonder how that will go

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      Poor “volunteers” will do the backbreaking manual labor. Rich volunteers will drive the heavy machinery in air conditioned cabins.

  • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    As someone who farmed for the first couple of decades of my life - no. We need to utilize drones for farming and ban the use of tires and fossil fuels (which deposit heavy metals) on fields.

    Also pretty sure glyphosate/Roundup caused health issues for everyone I know and myself (all farmers/in farm communities). It’s a neurotoxin and is in the entire Ogallala acquifer and most ground water around farms and their watershed. I spoke with a lead state toxicologist in the PNW about this. It verifiably has effects on fish and insects in the watershed here (which Monsanto claims is too diluted to have effects).

    • Chainslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      My father was a farmer in the 90s and wrote to Bill Clinton to ask for more regulation and study of the effects of pesticides and more protections for farmers in relation to pesticides and Bills response back was basically “No”. It did come on a really nice piece of paper though and had the “from the desk of the president” letter head and everything.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I emailed Trump and Biden both about implementing a free national online school prek-college, using adaptive learning and with no time restrictions. Kids can use this online school as a supplement to regular schooling or in lieu of. This way, parents who are concerned about school shootings or illness can still feel like their kid is getting an okay education.

        Adults who have already graduated can take these classes to refresh knowledge (helping to combat misinformation online). If Christians want to teach and learn Christian theory, fine, that can be in a Christian theory area (Christian science should not be considered actual science but instead a theology).

        Teachers can compete for best online class and schools and teachers could get bonuses for the most popular material. The grading should be done by either a computer or paras who are employed at the national level.

        Students then can also have access to various language accomodations and disability accomodations for all their lessons. This is also why there should be no time restrictions - kids with learning disabilities might take a year to learn a half semester of algebra, or young adults with jobs might also need extra time too. The time limits we place on learning are arbitrary and only help out people with advantages already.

        Last there should be no general studies requirement with the adaptive online learning. If a kid LOVES trains, let the adaptive learning teach them all about trains. Maybe that means the kid will learn about calculating the impact speed of two trains colliding, so they incidentally learn math and physics. But we shouldn’t require they learn math and physics if they don’t choose to.

        Anyway, I wrote this out to them and got really lame letters back too. It’s crazy because this school idea is a legacy program that could cement a president’s name forever in education, like how Teddy Roosevelt is associated with National Parks. Yet Trump didn’t want the idea. Biden neither. Maybe Harris will like it. It’s quite elegant imo and win/win. I’ve spoken with numerous educators about it and they have no criticisms. It’s like our government doesn’t want progress