• BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Yes, yes, yes. He’s not just a TV show host. He legitimately puts his time, money, and reputation where his mouth is. I have a lot of respect for Jon Stewart as a person with moral character, intelligence, and influence. I would advocate forcing him into the election even if he doesn’t want it. In fact, that he doesn’t want it is all the more reason to push. We need someone like him desperately.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Anybody that doesn’t want the job is imminently more qualified that anybody who does in my opinion.

      • themadcodger@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

        To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

        To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.

        – Some hoopy frood

        • bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          Simple solution, we execute every president as they leave office! Secondary solution, we vote on whether to not execute the president as they leave office, 2/3rds majority needed to abstain the execution

      • switcheroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Ooo so you’re saying I’m qualified? That’s a shit job I don’t want. Fucks up your hair and ages you. Plus there’s a good chance I might send some reps I don’t like on a scouting trip to Mars.

        Oh dang, I AM qualified!

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      I mean after Trump got elected, it really did show the world that anyone can become anything, twice.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    I’d vote for him. Even when we disagree on stuff-- a rarity-- he is still leagues better than anyone in the Pedo Party. John is more of a man and a human being than that scum sucking pig drumple thinskin could ever be.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    Yes. He would make the hard choices we would understand we needed to make. Not the choices of self-preservation most all politicians make.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      TBH we need to bring back fireside chats. A more direct communication from President to people. Imagine if that was just the expectation

      For my part, if I were President, I would explain what I am working on and who is in my way. Just every week. “This week, my main goal is still universal healthcare. I want everyone to be able to get the medical care they need. Here is a list of the senators currently opposing, and the state they represent…”

  • ur_ONLEY_freind@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    I love this idea but what if he was bernie sanders vice president first?

    My biggest complaint for people saying sanders should be next is that I think he’s too old, But if john Stewart was his vice president I would love that idea. And then immediately follow up with two terms of Stewart

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      I can’t imagine I will be alive to see the day that the US elects two Jews to the White House.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well…that’s what conservatives said about Trump. Not saying John wouldn’t be amazing though.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          It’s not though. Yes, the two are not only diametrically opposed in their political beliefs but their actual commitment to public service as well. But when Trump first ran he was just a reality TV star, being backed by the GOP machine of course. The real difference is that in contrast, the DNC would likely do everything in it’s power to sabotage Stewart if he tried to run like they do with any and all progressive leaning people.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Jon could absolutely destroy anyone on a debate stage. Mainly because it’s a popularity contest, and he’s spent his entire life learning to be popular on screen and stage. He’s also a smart guy with great insight into a lot of situations.

    None of that means he would be a good president. It’s a different set of skills.

    The bottom line though, would he be better than the alternative? And I hear what you’re saying. Those nazi crack monkey’s put on a hell of a show, how could Jon possibly do a better job? I’m not sure, but given the option, I think I’d give him a shot.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 hour ago

      He would mop the floor at the debates but I’m not sure debates matter anymore. I remember “they’re eating the cats” not mattering as much as it should have.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        47 minutes ago

        Oh it mattered, it became a chuckle line used in memes that I couldn’t enjoy even at the time because I knew that his stupid, racist bullshit would not be interpreted in a normal way by most of the electorate.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      I would say the most important skill is listening to experts, and knowing when you aren’t one. Jon has this down.

      You don’t want a president who thinks they’re an expert in everything. You want one who knows that aren’t and is willing to bring experts in to guide them.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think the Jon for president thing is copium, but to be fair Jon does have two of the most important traits in a president: conviction and a good bullshit detector. Whether he’d be able to do the day to day work aside, there’s no reason to believe he wouldn’t be able to lead the country in a better direction in a big picture sense.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe. But the time for Jon Stewart was 2024. There wasn’t a single person alive in a better position to take down Trump.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Zelenskyy did it. Ukraine would no longer exist as a sovereign nation today if he didn’t; it would have been entirely annexed into Russia right now.

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Exactly. In the US right now, only a comedian is capable of getting the joke. It works everywhere else it’s been tried. Vote Stewart!

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’d be a better analog if everything else Zelenskyy has done as president wasn’t eclipsed by Russia invading. Would he have been considered a good president if that hadn’t happened? We’ll never know.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        He stepped up as a leader when his nation needed him. That is one of the best qualities to have. Anything else is just whatsboutism that can be applied to anyone.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Nobody is questioning his bravery or accomplishments, but peacetime politics require particular skills.

          • ramble81@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The US is in far from normal times. It may not be a military war (yet) but this sure as hell isn’t “peacetime”

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Would he have been considered a good president if that hadn’t happened? We’ll never know.

        A quick glance back shows very much no. However, he stepped up for the war.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Zelensky was an actor who started in a hit sitcom about a teacher who gets elected president to fight corruption, and Ukrainians responded by making him president.

    I look at John Stewart, and see how that could happen. I’d for Stewart in a second, over ANY MAGA candidate.