Because I hate unnecessary fences. And people who love them are annoying.

Losing a tiny amount of money from the federal budget is irreparable harm. But starvation? Just fine.

This Supreme Court is a joke. I just heard they’ve ruled with the fascists over 90% of the time.

And it wasn’t even about it going on the ground or whatever it was about him failing his duty to impregnate his brother’s widow, which was expected of him. Sounds bizarre today but due to the rules of inheritance at that time, it was considered a service to the widow.

There aren’t any.

I’m aware, that’s why it was a question.

They do it because they normally get away with it. And countless people have had their lives ruined by this behavior.

I assume you mean JFK, was he talking about this?

But I mean we as in the people of the US. Our leaders have very different incentives than we do.

When are we going to start talking about abolishing the FBI?

I believe you can be both a demsoc and a Marxist, no?

I feel like people need to think more deeply about cancellation and when it is and is not appropriate. Personally, I think it’s basically never appropriate for random powerless individuals to be canceled, no matter what they did. There’s just other, better ways to handle harmful behavior.

Where cancellation is useful is for powerful, influential people who are actively and unapologetically harming people on an ongoing basis and can’t be stopped through other means. I’m not super familiar with Fuentes but it seems like he fits more in this latter category.

Do it you coward.

I am actually curious if he considers himself a Marxist. Any information on this?

Can’t be passed over for the Nobel peace prize if the prize committee is reduced to radioactive slag.

Activism and community organizing is a great affordable hobby. Can’t say it’s easy on the calendar though.

For me it’s 32.33% to death. Repeating, of course.

Problem is people with good hearts aren’t very interested in manipulating people.

Wasn’t it just the other day that the China apologists were trying to convince us they’re abolishing the death penalty imminently?

It has some advantages but I think it will make public services even more subordinated to the interests of the wealthy. Since they would have almost sole discretion on where that money goes.

It matters but Trump’s polling is remarkably stable. Headlines are overstating the changes which are barely measurable.

I’m sorry, small government? Where is that happening?