Extremely old singer sewing machine gang unite

People under 25 already rarely vote. It’s not going to change as much as people might want I bet

They didn’t have to say anything. He’s had people call things adverse health conditions on the news before and ignored them.

Because it’s funny as shit.

I want someone else to do make up for me but none of my friends know how to do make up ~~~ ): not a single one between the men and women and non binary

Yeah, but if you look on most social media, most everyone is paying zero attention to those 2. Lemmy is self selecting for moderately more aware of this kind of detail people.

They probably just drew lots or some shit. Doesn’t really matter to them who did it, as the public is just going to see the Republicans who voted no.

Aren’t they a charity?

If by “most” you mean your one anecdotal experience

Be a lot less far from carrying capacity if people even tried to be sustainable.):

No, instead y’all stomp around at 8 in the morning, and mow your lawns at 7 in the morning, rudely walking up night shifters…

Soft power is important. One of the usa’s key ways to build soft power was aid that was a lot more generous and a lot less conditional than many other power’s aid.

One train of thought says that if they take the role of being the so called global police, the aid is the responsibility that comes with that power. And although I don’t fully agree with the logic, it’s pretty solid

There’s no conflict with the whole chem stuff and life having a meaning. Something accidentally can still create its own meaning

Serial it’s important to note, while the conviction was certainly done through wrong ways, it did not prove he was innocent in completeness iirc

Classic example of calling someone an idiot just because they disagree with you on something that’s primarily about subjective values.

Or could like, be a. Actual city doing that?

A hunting cabin is purely a luxury. There’s nothing authoritarian about having high taxes for luxuries, and no, blanket taxes on luxuries are not inherently authoritarian.

Sure, it could unfairly impact people, but since in this situation there’s no needs, only luxuries, the balance of how increased housing supply fairly easily balances the scale.

And no, the point of my original comment is to understand impact. Realize harms the law could create, and don’t do it blindly. But that’s just to understand what you’re putting on the scales.

Progressive taxes are not authoritarian in nature holy shit man.

Genuinely, I’m saying this to bring up that it’s an ill effect that will come about, and to show OP that it isn’t as clear cut and dry morally as rich get screwed, and houses get easier to buy. I don’t especially think an exception clause is reasonable, I believe they will just be abused, and it’s simply better to accept some level of negative consequences for the benefits.

They can barely split it because they’re all broke af not because the house is expensive. The house and land are pretty cheap