• acchariya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    A shame, such a tasteless choice. If you had as much class as money, you’d have chosen something like a vintage 1960s submariner rather than a frivolous toy available on every high street in the world.

  • owl@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Woow, what does it do?

    • It tells time.

    Nothing else? So does my car.

  • notarobot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    I feel like owning expensive stuff like that is non optional for the very rich. Those who answer things like “my phone already does that” do sound poor. They don’t buy it because they need the time. They buy it because it looks nice and is expensive.

    I think I would make a disgusted face and say something like “really? It doesn’t look like it. What brand is it?”

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago
    • Your clock stopped. (Looks at the clock)
    • No it’s still working.
    • You are bald on tip of your head I saw it when you were looking at the clock.
  • Alloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “and i have a piece of cardboard thats worth more than your watch” whips out a charizard

  • oppy1984@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So you could have donated that money to a food bank or homeless shelter and gotten a tax break. Or you could have just kept it and invested in dividend paying stock, but instead you spent it on a watch that tells you the same time as my $20 watch?