• architectonas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Sure, the general “birth control is bad for you” message is not optimal. But the root of this misinformation are insights about the side effects coming up more or less recently. iirc one third to half of all women on hormonal birth control experience major side effects like headaches, nausea or mood changes. I can see how these significant findings combined with patriarchy awareness and associated anger led to exaggerated messages.

    Nonetheless, I think people thinking more critically about birth control is a good thing as one should always consider both benefits and risks.

    Edit: Or did I misread this post? If so, I’m very sorry…

    • presbypenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Do you know what has all of those adverse effects in much greater frequency while also having a profound effect on your life? Pregnancy

      Yes, the medical field has done a fucking terrible job of communicating the adverse effects of anything to do exclusively with AFAB bodies - look up what an IUD insertion is like without anesthesia - but again, if we compare hormonal birth control to pregnancy in terms of adverse physiological and mental effects, it’s not even on the same planet.

      Yeah, it might not be great for a sizable percentage of folks, and a minute percentage of folks have more immediately dangerous adverse effects that make taking hormonal birth control impossible, but in almost every case pregnancy is worse.

      There’s an obvious reason to get pregnant, for sure, but it comes with much, much greater risks than preventing it, especially if you don’t want the intended outcome of pregnancy.

      • rat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        27 minutes ago

        look up what an IUD insertion is like without anesthesia

        Yep. When I got my first IUD in, that was some of the worst pain I had experienced in my life. Felt like I was getting stabbed in the cervix, and the cramps afterwards were so bad I puked. Totally worth it, but I wish they had prepared me more beforehand (said I would feel a “pinch”).

      • architectonas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I feel like the tumblr post is aimed primarily at hormonal birth control and the like. This is what I had in mind writing my comment at least. I am not arguing in support of not using any birth control at all. The simplest and not much less safe method are condoms. Easy to use and basically no side effects.

    • Graphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah the pill is a great tool but can definitely have its side effects. I know my wife on it had a terribly low libido to the point we joked that’s how it kept you from getting pregnant

    • Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There are some serious health implications too like reduced bone density, heart issues, and cancer risks. Women should have the choice to take them if they want to obviously, but there can be very real side effects.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Don’t most of these issues relate to the pill specifically? The pill releases far more hormones in the body than a UDI which to my understanding is safe for most women.

    • huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think there is a lot you can about side-effects on anti-conception (from condoms are a hassle to pills mess with hormones), but lately young people are more in favour of ‘natural sex’ such as you pulling out early when the woman is ovulating which is (obviously) far less effictive. But the thing is,

      one should always consider both benefits and risks.

      young people aren’t good at considering the the results of those results because a) their brain is still developing and b) experience comes from trying. They need to be protected against themselves, just like we do with alcohol, drugs, driving etc.

      • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I get where you’re coming from, but there’s a bit of a (hopefully unintended) subtext in your comment that women must be the ones to bear the inconvenience in order to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

        Used correctly, condoms are about 1% off from hormonal birth control in effectiveness. But I guess headaches, nausea, and other side effects for women aren’t all that bad compared to some reduced sensation for the penis. After all, women are already used to it from their cycles, right? /s

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          women must be the ones to bear the inconvenience in order to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

          Women are the ones who get pregnant. Take it up with evolution.

          This is like complaining that you’re the one who’s expected to lock your doors to prevent unwanted people in your house. Sure, you CAN choose to trust someone else to lock your doors for you, but ultimately, it IS your house, and YOU’RE the one who suffers the consequences if there’s a break-in, so when it comes down to it, it makes perfect sense to consider it primarily YOUR responsibility to take the precaution against the outcome that YOU (at least, you more than anyone else) don’t want.

          Used correctly, condoms are about 1% off from hormonal birth control in effectiveness. But I guess headaches, nausea, and other side effects for women aren’t all that bad compared to some reduced sensation for the penis.

          Don’t pretend women don’t also prefer sex without a condom, lol. Condoms are never wanted, by either men or women, when their STI/contraceptive ‘abilities’ aren’t needed.

          After all, women are already used to it from their cycles, right?

          The biggest irony of this is that women can stop having periods altogether with the right contraception, and that’s one of the many reasons women (especially those who have especially-unpleasant/painful periods) go on them, aside from actually needing to prevent pregnancy.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Handing out endocrine disrupting medication to teenagers for decades to come is a pretty crazy idea if you stop to think about it. Not to throw the baby out with the bath water, but we do have a lot to learn about how the human body works.

      Everyone should be using condoms, though. It’s a good backup for monogamous couples and it’s the bare minimum that people who change partners more frequently should do. Have you seen the Gonorrhoea stats lately? And the antibiotic resistance? Bag it!

      • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Handing out endocrine disrupting medication to teenagers is a pretty crazy idea

        JK Rowling would be proud.

        the ole’ “we don’t have enough data to let children have autonomy over their bodies”