• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s fine because there’s an equal and opposite balcony on the other side of the house… So they balance each other out.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    No. Remove the 2x2s, you’re fucking up an otherwise good aesthetic.

  • kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Technically, you could remove them and it would have nearly the same effect.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not true at all.

      The bowing out wood underneath makes it look WAY more precarious to the average person. Without some sort of visual out audio cue to signal stress, often people assume that anything that stands without moving and looks intentional is secure.

      In summary, if you remove them, unobservant people will lose out on their opportunity to look upon it with fear.

  • Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Laws of physics? They’re more what you’d call “guidelines” than actual rules

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I’m guessing those pretty beefy joists are cantilevered, and the 2x2s are unnecessary. They were likely added for the joke.

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That thing is waaayyy too long to be cantilevered. 24" of max overhang is a pretty typical standard for deck. That doesn’t include the roof. Even with that, they would need to have modified the supporting exterior wall to handle the extra load.

        The question is when not if it’s going to fall off the house.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          24" of max overhang is a pretty typical standard for deck.

          Most decks don’t have 12" joist supporting them… Plus, the roof appears to be cantilevered as well.

          modified the supporting exterior wall to handle the extra load.

          Tbh it’s hard to tell, it really looks like a house with interesting bones that got wrapped in shitty vinyl in the early 00’. But I’m not seeing any anchoring hardware, so there’s a chance that the joists are interconnected with the ones supporting the second floor.

    • TomMasz@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Might not be that long, they could have easily had it all lying around. They don’t seem like the type to go out and buy new lumber just because.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The wood looks weathered, but not rotten. And the joist on the front is probably the most weathered, since it is the most exposed to sun and rain, while the others have been protected by the roof.

      I’d argue for a thorough inspection, and my bet is that most of the joists would be in pretty decent shape. Replace the ones that need replacing, and then sand and stain for better weather resistance in the future. Would probably be a project that takes a couple weekends for a competent DIY-er.