• EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The level of short sightedness in this pursuit is laughable, even if it’s coming from corporate.

    You pirated a song?

    Well then, we’re going to cut off your internet so that we can never effectively market anything we make to you ever again.

    We’ll gladly lose out on all the revenue you normally spend on corporate movies, tech, and content because we’d rather hyper fixate on the pennies of lost revenue that mp3 cost us, than ever worry about the macro economic conditions of the real people it comes from.

    Fucking LOL.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s the same idea as “death penalty will scare people out from committing murder”

      The hope is the threat will stop new people from getting into that

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My Google account that I had for 15+ years got banned from YouTube when I let my 9 year old play around making edited videos. He’d mash up clips from PBS Kids and other places. Apparently PBS didn’t like this and after a couple of vague warnings, my account is banned from YouTube for life, no actual chance of appeal. Of course I could just ditch it and open a new account under another name, but I’m stubborn, over seven years have passed and they’re still silent on the issue. I can watch YouTube, but not comment or post videos. Oh well.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Death penalty is an ineffective deterrent mostly because people tend to commit the crimes it’s used as a punishment for while not thinking, or caring, about the consequences at all.

        Now, forget cutting off the internet, if you’d get the death penalty for getting caught pirating music, it would prove to be a very effective deterrent at stopping it. I guarantee, zero piracy after a few years.
        A lot smaller population left to buy the legal media too, though, but hey, no pesky pirates!

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Death penalty is an ineffective deterrent mostly because people tend to commit the crimes it’s used as a punishment for while not thinking, or caring, about the consequences at all.

          People pirate for not caring about the consequences

          Death penalty for its use cases though is getting off easy. That’s why you find people killing themselves either with murder-suicide or suicide in prison

          It’s like “what if we gave you no punishment at all”

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      For me it’s having a kind of Streisand Effect… Is there a mass torrent of just Sony songs I can grab? Cus fuck em, I want it just out of spite

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Forget marketing. They want every game to require logging in to their servers. You won’t even be able to buy or play their games.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They could but let’s be honest, the AI companies have no capital to take. They’re just one big ponzi scheme waiting to collapse as soon as new investors stop coming in faster than they leave.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Spectrum had a policy like this at one point. They’d shut you off after a couple of instances of p2p that were reported. Afterwards, they directed you into a captive portal with some plausible deniability where you had to say “I don’t know what happened, but it won’t happen again”.

    Nowadays they just send you an email but don’t restrict access.

    Either way the Internet isn’t too safe, protect yourself with at least a VPN.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Cut us all off, so corporate can use internet, what they meant to use it for. Corporate Porn.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Um, has there ever been a time Sony, the rootkit DRM company has not called for state intervention to enforce IP laws regarding Sony holdings? (All the while Sony pirates anyone else’s stuff.)

    This is like the news that Comcast objects to municipal areas opening up Comcast monopoly regions to new ISPs. Sony is almost as bas as Nintendo when it comes to their franchises.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Get a vpn provider. Set the location as the Netherlands. Set up a docker container with deluge and openvpn, and set it up to use your vpn provider.

    Voila. You only need run your torrent traffic through the vpn, and it’ll be on its own kill switch.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve never forgiven Sony for decades deleting an account with paid for expensive games on it, they claimed inactivity for 6 months and UK law meant they had to.

    No other account (with purchases) I have has ever just got deleted on me and you better believe Sony are never getting a single penny from me again.

  • Magnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Reason #56,789 of why Sony is on my permanent embargo list since 2002. They treat their customers like absolute shit. And they pay their bills.

    If Sony is involved you know it’s straight sleaze. If there was an award for most evil company, they’d be leading.

    Sony’s part of the fine was raised by a third for trying to obstruct the investigation by refusing to answer inquiries made by the EU officials and shredding of evidence during the multiple law-enforcement raids.

    From their part in the videotape price fixing snafu back some 20 years. That’s how they roll.

    • sep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sony would be in the running. But i think nestle would beat them on the top spot.

      • Magnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        They’d both be graping each others mothers for the prize I’m sure…

        Funnily enough, my old employer hired an HR rep… formerly from Nestle. Just, wow. Like the worst kind of human I’ve ever met. Man can these shitty companies spot “talent.”

        I’m convinced to work for either, you need to film yourself eating the liver from a blind baby in your final interview.

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I won’t use a phone company that listens to my calls and criticizes me for who I speak with. I won’t use an internet provider that monitors what I download or shares that info with third parties. The only other way to catch someone downloading, is if an agent of the copyright holder is uploading the torrent file.

    If you hire private security to give me free beer outside of your store, you can’t accuse me of shoplifting because I accepted the free beer.

      • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Assuming no VPN is being used, to get your IP while you are seeding, they would need to be connected and downloading. When downloading a torrent you are also sharing the parts you have already downloaded with other torrent users. The agent of the copyright holder has to give the copyrighted material away for free in order to see the IP address of the seeders. By giving it away for free while in the employ of the copyright holder, they are authorizing the sharing of the material.

          • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Download something and look at the columns in the torrent client. You will see download and upload speeds. While you are downloading, you are also sharing the same file with others who are downloading it.

              • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Never tried that. I will look for that setting and see what it does next time I need to download something.

                • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  I’ve never tried it either. It would be kind of an asshole thing to do. Torrenting only works because everyone contributes their fair share.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It costs a holiday and a nice dinner to make the SCOTUS say “um, ackchually, the constitution doesn’t say anything about access to the internet”.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      As an aside that’s one of the major things I’ve never understood about how SCOTUS developes rulings, ie: how they use ‘original intent’ to figure out current issues.