• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Huh. I always took the term “lost cause” at face value, and thought it simply meant that the confederacy was hopeless and doomed to fail. I didn’t realize it was based on hypocrisy and lies. Thanks for the heads up!

    Edit: the more I read that Wikipedia page, the angrier I get

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shit, if you think you’re mad now, wait until you run into someone that’s still running that line of bullshit in 2025

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve always heard it called the “Lost Cause Of The South” by racist rednecks; they seem to be aware enough (or someone was, whoever it is they’re parroting) to attempt to distance it as much as possible from terminology that associates it with slavery because otherwise it looks even worse. Even though slavery is absolutely what it was all about.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      2 days ago

      “There is no evidence that the civil war was about slavery”

      looks at the speech by Davis talking about how it was all about slavery plus hundreds of other documents

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Confederate constitution mentions slavery everywhere

          Its almost like they wanted to ensure slavery continued to last

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          But actually it was democrats who were the slavers! That’s why republicans honor their democrat heritage by flying a traitor flag? Fuck I can’t even keep up with their mental gymnastics.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union.

        In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.

        Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      …likewise; my wife was apoplectic when i suggested that the civil war was about secession…

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can you explain that a little more? I’m guessing you meant secession, but even then I don’t get what you mean. Like, they seceded but the topic would be about WHY they did that.

        But I’m probably missing something.

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          (yes, secession; autocorrect squiggled it into another word as i was typing)

          …just that, though: we were taught that emancipation was just one of many issues stemming from increasingly-fundamental differences in economic, social, and international policy, and that the war itself precipitated from the southern states asserting a right to secession and sovereignty which the federal government did not grant…

          …we were also taught that the spark was actually southern states’ seizure of federal assets…

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          my fucking midwestern education was like that. the textbooks said that there was an open question about whether states have the right to secede from the union as if the Confederacy was just Just Asking Questions

    • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had struggled with AP Euro in high school and had decided to just take regular US history the following year. Absolute mistake. My teacher was the football coach and was a huge proponent for the ‘states rights’ BS. This was in one of the better funded school districts in SoCal.

    • Forester@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Weird we learned that it was states rights to own people in VA Middle School and how the plantation system worked

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Part of it is also the constant push to try to weave the principles of confederacy into the fabric of American history via monuments and memorials, to build up this idea that the confederacy is part of the modern American identity rather than antithetical to it.

    See for example the recent controversy surrounding the military installation called Fort Bragg. Braxton Bragg was a slave-owning confederate general who, by all accounts, was not even a good leader. But given the fort’s location in North Carolina, one of the former confederate states, it got its name presumably due to local military officials sympathetic to the “Lost Cause” narrative, and stuck until just recently.

    In 2023, the Biden administration pushed to change the name of the fort to “Fort Liberty” so as to continue removing these Lost Cause memorials and end this myth, but this year the Trump administration just recently renamed it back to Fort Bragg, ostensibly now named after a different Bragg who was just a paratrooper during World War II. But no one is fooled by what they’re trying to do.

    It’s almost sad, really, just how badly they’re clinging to this myth even today. But I guess more scary than sad, given that half of the government is essentially run by traitors. And it’s really been that way for a long time now I suppose, but shocking how strongly they still choose to hold their ground on these ridiculous narratives when pushed.