• Daryl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The Americans are panicking over China, they have no idea what to do and are just making knee-jerk responses pretending they are doing something and looking ‘tough’ in the eyes of Americans. Yet what exactly can they do to a country that has 3 trillion US dollars in ‘spare change’ of your currency and holds US$759 billion in your treasury bills?

    The fact is, just like the financial meltdown a while back, China will just use this opportunity to buy up even MORE of American manufacturing, invest in building more US manufacturing plants (using American slave labor wage workers) and soon the US will be nothing more than a branch plant country for Chinese corporations, all profits returning back to China.

  • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Say what you will about China’s political system. At least it is much more of a meritocracy. The politicians who climb up the ranks are the ones who have a proven record of achievements.

    In the US the people can elect a charlatan with no experience whatsoever, i.e. an outsider, and some will spin this as a good thing. Would you hire an outsider doctor or plumber?

    Edit: since people are failing to understand the idea. Remember how Republicans mocked Obama for being a community organizer? Imagine the opposite, any president must have some demonstrable experience as a community organizer. It is not a panacea, Obama still committed war crimes and was beholden to moneyed interests but much much much more qualified than Trump could ever be. Merit doesn’t mean the person will be good but that they will be qualified.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not sure whether Xi keeping the job is faltering of the CCP’s ideal of collective leadership, or him being the guy the collective leadership wants as figurehead. They certainly don’t want a second Mao that’s for sure.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The politbureau/party can still elect a new leader even if term limits are removed. There is democracy for “qualified voters” in China.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Dude, fuck the CCP, just like because the GQP are turds doesn’t mean the CCP are the good guys

    • qnvx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Wait, based on what are you saying this? That’s a complicated to verify claim.

      • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        How is it a complicated to verify claim? Even if you choose to ignore the obvious outcomes, there’s plenty of publications and studies about it. That’s the problem with limiting yourself to “China experts” from the West, they never bother to learn the language or learn about China’s history and politics.

        https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-8057-2_23

        In China all politicians including the premier start out as civil servants and a required to pass an entrance exam and have to climb up the ranks.

        The US could probably adopt some of this without changing too much. A simple spelling test could have weeded out Trump. Ideally, a number of years of experience in civil service/local politics, should also be required to run for president.

        It should be be implicitly obvious so it shouldn’t be explicitly stated. But we are simply comparing how the two systems position people of power. It is not about the people themselves in the positions. Think of it like a company that has its CEO climb up the ranks from an entry level employee vs a company that brings outsiders. Except the latter company leaves the decision to mostly an unqualified mass that sometimes hires a highly unqualified person. Both companies can be evil, or the former evil and the latter good, none of this matters to the point that I’m making.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Not really the CCP is basically using a reformed Mandarin system. To rise within the ranks of the party they look at a combination of how well the thing you administered (e.g. a state factory) performed in comparison to whatever is comparable, as well as opinion polls of the local population, which aside from making sure that you won’t be hated (which could cause disquiet and if there’s one thing the CCP doesn’t want then that’s that) also doubles at sniffing out manipulated numbers, the people are generally quite good at spotting corrupt officials. If you rank well within your cohort you get promoted from administering a factory to administering local industry, then regional, etc, etc. What doesn’t happen any more is grading people based on how good their poetry is as well as cutting off their balls but the basic system is, broad strokes, similar to how Imperial China educated and selected its civil servants.

        That doesn’t mean that there’s not corruption and grift going on, there’s still some degree of princeling privilege but it’s basically impossible to fail upwards in the CCP. Knowing people or being someone’s kid might open some doors, but it’s not going to guarantee you anything. It also means that the top ranks are full of for lack of better characterisation engineer bureaucrats.

        Or, put differently: If the CCP was completely incapable they would’ve long lost power. Their whole legitimacy hinges on being perceived as good administrators, they know that, and they’re doing their darnedest to not lose it. Propaganda and secret police alone is not sufficient, history has shown that again and again, you actually need to be good at stuff that’s important to people or they cease to tolerate you.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The politicians who climb up the ranks are the ones who have a proven record of achievements

      I don’t know where you got that from.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      At least it is much more of a meritocracy.

      This isn’t at all true. It has the same corruption as everywhere else. Those in power do everything they can to keep it. Why do you think Pooh Bear got himself made president for life? That wasn’t on merit, he just had enough political power to make it that way.

      • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        He got up to the point that he can do that through merit. He didn’t suddenly get elected as premier. The point I’m trying to make went right past you. “I point to the stars, you look at my fingertips”.

        This isn’t about Xi himself or Trump himself. Xi could be worse than Netanyahu, Trump could be better than Sinwar. It is about how those in power get there, how the system selects its leaders. I tried giving an analogy in my other comment.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    362
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think Xi might have figured out Trump’s secret. He has no fucking clue what he’s doing. He scares people into reacting by being reckless, then claims a win for getting a reaction.

    Ignoring trolls takes their power away.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      186
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”

      (“Quand l’ennemi fait un faux mouvement, il faut se garder de l’interrompre” --Napoleon)

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      4 days ago

      https://snyder.substack.com/p/the-weak-strongman

      Basically, this strategy Trump and Putin and their ilk do never works outside of their little bubble. Their whole game is to tear everyone else in their sphere of influence down to their level, so that they can compete effectively and dominate, but there are always significant threats outside of the sphere. Against which we are now more or less powerless.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’re not really ignoring him though. They’ve discontinued exports of rare earth and are dumping debt. It’s a calculated strategic response to capitalise on an epic mistake.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This only works if you’re China. Most other countries would just be ignored

      • bravesirthomas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not really, he backed down on tariffs last week thanks to Canada and Japan. The truth is, Trump has put the US into a very, very precarious position. They have a lot of debt to refinance soon, and if the rest of the world wanted to, they could dramatically increase the interest rates paid on that by coordinating a sell-off of US debt.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        never interrupt your enemy while he is fumbling his shit. or something.

  • CPMSP@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    225
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That’s business school from a guy who ran casinos into the ground. Nice work America.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    219
    ·
    4 days ago

    Everyone is somehow missing China cutting off rare earth metals the US relies on for technology and defense

    • DoubleSpace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      161
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It wasn’t just stopping exports to the US, they’ve stopped exporting rare earth elements worldwide starting yesterday. Plus, they are starting to unload billion of debt we owe them. It’s almost as if Trump is intentionally trying to destroy our country in the morning, and then later in the day he wants to be the bully negotiator without understanding his precarious position.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        4 days ago

        You remember r/shitamericanssay? Last time he won, there were a lot of people talking about stuff Europe has but America doesn’t, and, if you browse the posts there, a lot of Americans responding how Europe is backwards, in the stone age, and what they do have is paid for by America, out of benevolence.

        Well, those folks are in charge now.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          4 days ago

          Our EU ‘leaders’ are US bootlickers.
          They’re a bit upset now that master is angry.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            The master isn’t angry, the master croaked, and his idiot son with anger issues is in charge now. The only question is if the EU will have the foresight to see the writing on the wall and bail before they’re caught in the undertow.

            • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              4 days ago

              Like I said, our EU leaders are puppets, they don’t have our interests in mind.
              They were perfectly fine with the slow death of seeing the economy and people suffer after the Nordstream US terrorist act.
              Not a peep from them.
              And even now they’re doing exactly what Trump wanted, spending more on useless killing toys.
              And it’s a whole lot more.
              Every country’s going to spend billions of money they don’t have and you know where they’re going to get it from.
              The already unhappy lowest layer of the population.
              Probably the last drop to push the extreme right in power. We’re almost in the 30’s again.

              • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                “And even now they’re doing exactly what Trump wanted, spending more on useless killing toys.”

                Useless? Russia invaded Ukraine. Putin won’t stop there.

              • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                At least they seem to be buying domestic this time around. I mean, I fully expect them to Hillary it, despite everything, but it’s not impossible to pull out of the tailspin yet.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        There wouldn’t be much point merely stopping export to the US because some other country could just on-sell to the US.

        He really doesn’t understand his precarious position and the harm he has done and is doing.

      • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think the story here will go very differently now that the US army can’t ensure it’s exclusively pro-US.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m realizing the structure of our supply chains is not common knowledge at all. Basically everything has a part from China. That and plastic.

    • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Canada didn’t. It’d be a primary reason for the US to go stupid and try invading us, we’re a much closer source of rare earths.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        As much as I don’t like the Chinese government for all the censorship and etc, they do really know what they’re doing in terms of managing the economy and the infrastructure it relies on, as far as I can tell. Including their education system, it’s fairly shocking how many of the top engineering and CS colleges are in China.

        • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Censorship? Its rich talking censorship in China when America is one of the most propagandized nations in existence. If I was China I would also censor the fuck out of America.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  There different forms of censorship. Flooding the dominant platforms with the official message to obscure opposition opinions, shadowbanning posts, etc are softer forms of censorship but are still censorship. The rulership class is fine with people voicing their opinions if they feel it doesn’t threaten their power. They will crack down harder when that feeling changes.

          • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            How does the US being full of propaganda change the fact that China has a lot of censorship?

            Both can be true at the same time, you know…

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was gonna post that one but “What is this business strategy called” gets me every time

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        It turns out that maximizing for shareholder profit isn’t a sustainable way to run a business, and it actually burns your company to the ground after a few short years.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      I love how everyone just sort of glazes over how astoundingly unpopular Steam was when it was first introduced.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was one of them. They proved my fears unfounded (so far). They’ve also managed to convert me to a fanboy at some point. I realised I was playing a co-op game brought off steam, on my steam deck, via a steam link to the TV, and the wife using a steam controller.

        • notarobot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I think steam is my favorite monopoly.

          ^Not saying it’s perfect. Just my favorite. I understand this might change at any time^

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            At least it’s only a monopoly because everyone else is apparently idiots when it comes to long term planning. I’m dreading the day when they turn to the dark side. Long away may it be.

          • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Valve is Augustus Caesar: a benevolent dictator doing great things for their people. I’m afraid of what will happen when Gaben retires, how long will it take before we find gaming’s Nero?

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s very possible. Trump gave them excuse to do this. They already set up a deal with Korea and Japan (and each two hate each other), and if they would set up a trade deal with EU then the US will be the only loser.

      Trump really hurt US with the tariffs on everyone (except Russia, North Korea and Belarus)

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I hope. I’ll miss my cheap goods but I have enough. I feel bad for young americans as cheap goods was one of the only perks left to living in this country.

      Cheap gas I guess will be one of the last dominoes to fall. That, and the collapse of the petro-dollar system, will be the final nails in the coffin of our economy.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Xi is more than happy to have a scapegoat for his economic troubles so the people and the powerful don’t hang him. Trump sometimes wants to speed run into the hanging and then realizes he really can’t piss off his own power base if he wants to keep his neck.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      The workforce is unionizing even if their union is pretty terrible.

      Definitely just a toss up of where this is going.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Which workforce? The Chinese? There’s only one union and it’s run by the government. Any non-government unions are illegal.

        The US is gaining a new interest in unions, but we have our own anti-union laws to deal with. Not as bad China’s obviously.

        • Omega@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          such a socialist country where union protests lead you to being disappeared

          Oh sorry, did I say socialist? China lines up better as a fascist economy.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah in a global environment essentially China is the workforce/factory workers of the previous gilded age.

          And it’s pretty much exactly my point that their union (the government) is finally pushing back against the management while being not exactly kind to their workers.

          We are essentially reliving through a new worker rebellion but from the governments of the global south with their own layers of local nuance underneath that.
          Weird times.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            A government is not a union.

            The rebellion is mostly demographics. We are at a point, where globalization reached most countries. At the same time births are around 138million ± 5milliion since 40 years. China itself even has population decline.

          • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah in a global environment essentially China is the workforce/factory workers of the previous gilded age.

            Maybe 15-20 years ago, but not so much anymore. Cost of labor has been rising in China dramatically to the point that a lot of manufacturing is leaving China.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            We need a vanguard party because the proles are too dumb to save themselves. We’ll prove it by banning unions that aren’t under our thumb.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Their wages are going up and young workers aren’t as interested in living the slave labor experience living in foxconn dorms working 100% of their time. It’s not a union but the overall effects are that policies are being forced to be more pro worker/ better salary and conditions just to meet staffing levels.

    • Daryl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      And what, exactly, is wrong with cheering for China? They have never invaded a foreign sovereign nation in their entire 400 year history. They have been invaded by a lot of other countries, however.

  • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 days ago

    Then everyone dumps on him, and he says the roll back was fake news and it’s still happening, but nobody even in the administration knows what’s going on.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 days ago

    Big flex from China. I’m waiting for a country to call trump’s bluff by putting an export tax on their own goods sent to the USA.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      If only… America holds 20% of global purchasing power so an export tax like that would result in needing to lower local interest rates to boost domestic productivity, which would decrease foreign investment, eventually weakening the local currency.

      It would be hilarious if a country that exports very little to nothing to the US did it to make a point though. Totally on board with that.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        America holds held 20% of global purchasing power…

        Truth be told, I think the only thing we really produced in the US was the US dollar. Sounds like it’s the number 1 export for the US, and trump just toppled demand for it.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        China is already weakening their currency to keep their exports (worldwide) more attractive.

    • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      Canada should have done this on everything. If the Americans can afford the tariff then there is room for us to charge more. Not really but yeah should do it.

    • Back_it_up@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Or, they just pay the tariff themselves. Could you imagine China going, “Cool bro, we’ll just absorb the cost ourselves. Now what?”

        • parody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          a s̵͎̣̫̼͙̄͂̀̇̚ṱ̵̨͓̹̮̪̖͈̐̏̓̅̈́͗͂̓̕͘a̶̢͉̦͈̬͛̐̎̉b̶̭̝̈́͒̆̓̇̀͛͛͠͝͝l̶̬̥͙̗̪͈͖̜̗̮̆̀̅̓̍͑̍́̓̈e̶̡̛̦͓̰̭̘͆̏̊̉͘one

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        That wouldn’t really do much for China. The reason the tariffs hurt us is that we sent all our manufacturing to them (along with a few other countries). So the tariffs only make our stuff cost more. Footing the bill like that would just weaken China’s position.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        What would happen is the US dollar would be weaker, profits selling to the US weakened. It would still harm us primarily.

  • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 days ago

    Didn’t this happen last time? Less dramatically, but still.

    He puts in a bunch of tariffs. China reciprocates. The market is thrown into chaos. He shouts and screams. China ignores him. He backtracks. China ends the tariffs but doesn’t do anything to try and appease him. He claims it’s a victory. His fluffers say the tariffs were just to bring China to the table, which justifies the hit to the market, despite the fact China didn’t come to the table and President Pigshit didn’t articulate what China could actually give him to end the tariffs.