• Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The Republican party deserves to die for allowing Donald Trump to rise to power. The Democrat party deserves to die for being useless to stop them. America needs a whole new fresh start with new parties

    • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      or better yet, no parties at all and force some of our morons to actually learn their candidates beyond just party lines.

      • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Idk, I’d totally be in favor of ranked voting; with several parties that correspond to music genres where people could identify the party’s values based on vibes. Ex: Acid Polka Party, Nu Delta Blues Party, Hyper Uplifting Metal Party, etc.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      We were within 2% of stopping them. If you bastards had got on board, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

      • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Let’s blame the voters instead of our shit policy and campaign that promises them nothing much more than republican lite

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          No fuck yes. Blame them.

          Are you saying that trump won because his policy and campaign was stellar.

          Trump won because his base acted instead of passively watching. They took over everything and all the left could say was “don’t roll with them something something pigs”

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I blame the owners of news and social media. How can people make good decisions if they can’t perceive reality?

            • ebolapie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              I don’t understand what you could possibly mean by this comment. We, as in the American electorate, directly chose fascism. What the fuck do you mean that we will see it soon enough? We didn’t take the path you say also leads there eventually, the only way to tell where it leads is theory. We are never going to see the real world impacts of the choice we did not make.

        • tacosplease@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The voters and especially the non-voters are to blame along with the politicians. Why shouldn’t they be responsible for voting against their own interests or sitting it out after having seen a Trump presidency?

    • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      See, they thought they could control him, like they did Reagan, and Bush Jr. Bush Sr. went along willingly.

      But Trump is an overgrown 5 year old, and needs to feel he’s in charge. Like any typical narcissist.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Man if only he could like vote to get rid of them or something. too bad he’s literally powerless and can’t do a thing to stop this. /s

    • sgtgig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If the 1920s really are repeating then, if we survive the Trump administration, we’ve got a modern version of the New Deal on the way.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They’ll give the rest of the world a breather which will allow us to finish forming a new economic and strategic structure where the United States plays a substantially diminished role. After that it won’t matter whether the Republicans or Democrats are in power; at least not to most of the world.

      • caboose2006@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Clearly you didn’t read the headline. Or reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit

  • Babalugats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    It’s insane to think that the same two partys remain in control in the US. Yet they call it democracy.

    • I’m referring to the voters, and their lack of action when their main party ha proven useless. The ‘swing voters’ never seem to swing between anything other than those two.
  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Truman’s campaign against the “Do Nothing” Republicans is not the cause, but it’s when these huge majorities for Democrats got cemented in place for decades:

    Isolationism is not dead. Far from it. Even if the Republicans get a presidential candidate with a good record in foreign affairs, he will not be able to drown out the raucous isolationist outcries of the rest of the party. And that prospect is beginning to scare the voters–and it ought to scare them.

    Now, we can always rely on the Republicans to help us in an election year, but we can’t count on them to do the whole job for us. We have got to go out and do some of it ourselves, if we expect to win.

    The first rule in my book is that we have to stick by the liberal principles of the Democratic Party. We are not going to get anywhere by trimming or appeasing. And we don’t need to try it.

    The record the Democratic Party has made in the last 20 years is the greatest political asset any party ever had in the history of the world. We would be foolish to throw it away. There is nothing our enemies would like better and nothing that would do more to help them win an election.

    I’ve seen it happen time after time. When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the fair Deal, and says he really doesn’t believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don’t want a phony Democrat. If it’s a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don’t want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.

    But when a Democratic candidate goes out and explains what the New Deal and fair Deal really are–when he stands up like a man and puts the issues before the people–then Democrats can win, even in places where they have never won before. It has been proven time and again.

    -Harry Truman, Address at the National Convention Banquet of the Americans for Democratic Action, May 17, 1952

    https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/129/address-national-convention-banquet-americans-democratic-action

    • ButtDrugs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Sorry, best we can do is folks who hold up little signs that say “lies” during speeches.

    • ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      But when a Democratic candidate goes out and explains what the New Deal and fair Deal really are–when he stands up like a man and puts the issues before the people–then Democrats can win, even in places where they have never won before. It has been proven time and again.

      I wish that were true. I might have been in the past, but we have a full third of our population that will not vote for anyone but Trump and a full third that were told over and over about Project 2025 and the Drak Enlightment but stayed home for whatever reason. That left the rest of us yelling till our voices were hoarse.

      • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Please the Democratic leadership, the DNC, the DCCC, the defacto “party leaders” like the Clintons and Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, RAHM EMANUEL…This element, these people, are at best conciliatory and at worst collaborators. Call them “phony Democrats”, call them whatever you want. I want them to fuck off.

        There is a reckoning coming, I think, and neither the Republicans nor the establishment Democrats are going to like it much. There is already an apparent sea change in some critical contests, and the polling data and turnout has been literally unprecedented.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s a reason the only candidate drumpf is scared of is Bernie Sanders. My man does exactly what Truman suggested and it works.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I wish that were true

        Besides the lame masculinity part (history is surely full of far more men who were cowards as leaders than women) it is true.

        There are many reasons turn out was crap, primarily people didn’t want Biden shoved down their throat again and Harris didnt have the time or space to differentiate herself.

  • Mallspice@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Republicans hurt the country and our reputation more than help it.

    It’s bad enough the only way America can save face now is to stop this.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    He doesn’t give a shit about the mass starvation, shantytowns, global economic depression, and rise of Nazism into the largest war in human history that left hundreds of millions dead. No, he’s worried because his party wasn’t in power.

    Fuck yourself with the largest, sharpest cactus that exists on the planet, you slimy, snivelling pathetic excuse for a fucking human, Rand Paul.

    • andrewA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The largest war in human history, so far…

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh no, what if democrats gain power and give us all healthcare and actually take care of the sick and poor. Wouldn’t that be terrible?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      He doesn’t have a party, he follows money and his popularity with his crazy fuckin base. The Republican party bought him just like they bought Reagan and I’m still not sure how anyone could be fooled by the exact same playbook.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I read your first paragraph as a prediction of the future, until l realized that you were talking about the Great Depression and WWII.

      “Those who ignore history, are doomed to repeat it” is supposed to be cautionary, but MAGA sees it as a game plan.

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I wish American Voters had memories longer than 4 years. But they don’t.

    They got pissed at Bush and the Republicans in 2006 for the war and in 2008 for crashing the economy.

    And 2 years later in 2010 they voted in a red wave not seen since reconstruction.

    Donald Trump tried to overthrow the government and 4 years later they gave him another chance. If Trump shot a crowd of people on 5th avenue the kids of the victims would vote for him 4 years later.

    • smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      There were massive voter suppression campaigns in both those election cycles. And it doesn’t help that the neo Liberals highjacked the democratic party, marginalizing labor. People are not motivated to vote for the lesser of two evils.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        People are not motivated to vote for the lesser of two evils.

        Neoliberals and centrists need to get this through their firewall of condescencion towards leftists, no matter how much y’all hate leftists (and laugh at leftists with your more conservative friends) you need to understand the average person in the US hates you and your leaders far more than than they hate genuine leftists that actually fight for the working class instead of spitting on them and publicly calling them stupid.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Neoliberals and centrists need to get this through their firewall of condescencion towards leftists

          It won’t. They benefit from corporate greed as much as the right does. They are enablers of fascism.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Leftists in America are a tiny minority that happens to be in a kingmaker role because the Dems and Repubs are nearly evenly matched. There is no vast silent majority of Leftists. You’re in an internet bubble.

          YOU need to get onboard with OUR ideas.

          • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Your ideas got us here. With democracy hanging by a thread because both the corporate Democrats and Republicans spent decades weakening the lower classes to enrich themselves. How many 70-80% approval rating policy idea have the Democrats spurned over the years because it would mildly inconvenience their mega donors in the short term?

              • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Decades? They had the presidency and both halves of Congress for the first two years under Obama and all they gave us was Mitt Romney’s health care plan. And again during the first half of Biden’s term.

                The Democratic leadership keeps actively stopping attempts to corral the ability of congressmen to get rich off inside trading. They spent the whole campaign season last year supporting and assisting in a very public genocide. Trustbusting has basically been forgotten - we only have the illusion of choice in our much each industry from the media to even our food products are dominated by like 3-4 companies within it.

                Whenever they do happen to get power, they do nothing with it, and then act surprised when they immediately lose it again.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Sure!

              • All people are equal before the law. Discrimination is abhorrent, and people’s personal freedoms should be respected until they harm others. Liberals and Leftists pretty much agree 100% on this so I won’t spend more time on it.

              • Capitalism is the most powerful social engine for beneficial progress that the world has ever seen, but we need to keep it under control. It’s like an engine - harnessed, throttled, and controlled explosive power to drive us forward at a manageable pace. Strong regulations, strong unions, progressive taxes, and heavy government incentives are the ways we keep capitalism under control. Currently, it is OUT of control and is doing far more harm than good.

              • Taxes on the rich should be higher, loopholes should be closed, and enforcement should be stepped up. There’s no consensus on exactly how much higher, but they all agree they should be higher.

              • At the same time, we recognize the potential economic effects of taxing the rich. If we’re not careful, they’ll just move their money elsewhere. So we want to raise taxes to the extent possible without triggering flight of the wealthy.

              • Everyone deserves a minimum standard of living. Food, shelter, and healthcare are human rights and should be free for those who can’t afford it.

              • Immigrants are good for the economy. Even the illegal ones. We should be making immigration easier.

              • Climate change is real, is man-made, and it is our duty as humans to do our best to fix it. However, we can do so to a large extent without causing hardship among everyday people, by making intelligent changes upstream from consumers. We can have economic growth AND tackle climate change, if we’re smart about it.

              Obviously, left-leaning liberalism is a wide-ranging ideology but these are the main ones that came to mind immediately. The biggest difference between liberalism and Leftism is that Leftists want to tear down capitalism and Liberals want to control it.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Fair enough. I think a lot of Liberals view socialism (like no shit real “own the means of production” socialism, rather than European capitalist-lite socialism of today) the same way as me: it sounds nice, it just doesn’t seem to work very well in practice. But hey if we can get it to work, neat. In the mean time, let’s get capitalism under control.

              • r3g3n3x@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                36 minutes ago

                This is what a lot of young leftists hand wave away

                Everyone deserves a minimum standard of living. Food, shelter, and healthcare are human rights and should be free for those who can’t afford it. - Immigrants are good for the economy. Even the illegal ones. We should be making immigration easier.

                Taking in infinite immigrants and providing food shelter and healthcare for them and their lineage until the end of time ALONG WITH all of the disadvantaged citizens is not economically sustainable. You’d effectively be turning the U.S. into the world’s homeless shelter. At some point, likely sooner than later, all the raised taxes in the world on the businesses that don’t leave won’t be enough to care for everyone.

                I’m all for compassion but it has to be reasoned compassion. You can’t just look at what your version of Utopia is and say that’s what we should do. Humanity is not perfect and neither will any society it builds be. But at the same time we can’t let perfect be the enemy of the good, and so we engage in these discussions.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Democracy will not save us. People that won’t vote unless they fall in love can fall out of love much more easily.

        Do vote, it’s low effort and it can make a marginal difference. Just make your plans assuming you party will lose and if they win they will disappoint.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Your treating this as if the same people are voting different ways. It’s usually much more along the lines of voters staying home one election and voting in another.

      Edit - autocorrect got naughty!

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Keep in mind that the voting system itself is rigged. States with lower populations tend to have more representation per capita due to the Electoral College. This biases everything towards red states.

      And that doesn’t even get at the decades of gerrymandering…

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    1 day ago

    Notice that’s their top concern. Not hurting Americans, not pissing off allies, not a recession, not handing off the title of World Superpower to China, but losing their jobs is their top concern.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      not handing off the title of World Superpower to China

      They put in the hours. Maybe they’ve fucking earned it. But if it makes you feel any better, most of the BRICS are rocketing upwards and positioned to match or eclipse the US by the end of the century. That’s just what happens when you implement modern industrial policies under a more egalitarian social system. Spreading the wealth engages more of the population in high value productive activities that benefit the national economy in the long run.

      After you’ve built a broadly productive economic engine, the only thing holding you back is the size of your productive population. At that point, policies like universal health care and efficient mass transit really start paying dividends.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s not like they needed us to fumble in order to take the trophy, but all the same we didn’t need to just hand them the ball and walk away.

  • selkiesidhe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Don’t threaten me with a good time!!!

    Also, it’s a wheel. The Cons ruin the economy, voters get mad and vote Democrat, Democrat fixes economy, voters don’t like the spending even though it’s improving everything so vote Con, the Cons ruin the economy, ect ect so on and so forth

      • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This could be a super duper long play hustle. Where after 4 years they just lay down and then in 12 years they slip back in and really fuck shit up after the left can’t fix anything they have done.

        By then AI will be in control, everyone will have elons chip in their brain and president baron will be choking kittens on the Whitehouse lawn to a stadium crowd while hologram kid rock plays the classics.

        Look out for project 2037 mark my words

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      That’s the same everywhere, not just the US.

      The right destroys what the left/center build so the left/center rebuild it and then the right destroys it again.

    • Crankley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, I find it kinda funny that the “great again” era that is constantly referenced is actually this era of loosing the House and the Senate that is specifically being refrenced now. Mate, you can’t have it both ways; do you want the house and the Senate and the House or do you want it to be “great again?”

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wouldn’t that be nice.

    Nicer would be the utter destruction of the Republican Party, followed by a split between the Corporate Democrats and Progressives into two parties.

    • OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or if the current R leadership becomes irrelevant, the Dems win for many terms in a row, and the new generation of Rs decide to appeal to the left by doing another party swap

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      So we’ll have like five progressives and the rest will be liberal corporate heels. We still won’t get anything useful. But at least we wouldn’t have republicans, so it’s better than nothing.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure is telling that his biggest worry is republicans losing power and not the sort of fucking depression that was the cause last time.