• Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Bees have been under assault for a while.

    It’s hive mites. The Varroa mite is going to wipe out all bees from the planet. And there’s not a damn thing we can do about it.

    Source: talked to a beekeeper.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    220
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Probably the same reason we had 40+ tornadoes, huge hailstorms, floods, and drought-enabled wildfires in six adjacent states within 48 hours. Anthropogenic climate change is real, whether you believe in it or not.

    The upside is now farmers won’t have to worry about what to do with the crop surplus from trade wars, dismantled USAID, and defunded school lunch program.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, one would expect mountainous areas to flood because elevation focuses water flow. I’m in Florida, flattest state in the union. We never flood except in hurricanes, and those floods don’t last like they do in other places, in and out.

          • Yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Hurricanes are known to travel in land and up North though. The fact a hurricane hit Tennessee isn’t odd. It was the strength and the length it lingered over the state that made it devastating.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              It’s always the lingering part. What was that one that fucked Houston not long ago? Sat on top of them forever. Hurricane Ivan was like that down here. Only a CAT-3 at landfall, but I listened to that freight train sound for over 10 fucking hours.

    • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Anthropogenic climate change is real, whether you believe in it or not.

      You know who believes in climate change? Fossil fuel companies, insurance companies, the military industrial complex, and every single politician talking about buying or taking Greenland by force. All the very same people who have spent the past half century publicly denying the existence of anthropogenic climate change. Not only do they believe in it, but they are designing their profit models around it at our expense.

  • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I definitely don’t want to downplay a crisis, but I feel like I’ve been seeing headlines saying “all the bees are dying and we don’t know why” every year for nearly 20 years now.

    I’m no bee expert. Just seems to me, based on the headlines, bees would’ve been extinct 10 years ago.

    Some cursory searching led me to Colony Collapse Disorder which seems to have no agreed-upon cause. It appears devastating losses to honey bee colonies started being reported around 1900. But it also mentions:

    In 2024, the United States Census of Agriculture reported an all-time high in commercial honey bee hives (mostly in Texas), making them the fastest-growing livestock segment in the country.[38]

    Link to the source cited there: https://archive.is/nfeb2

    Apparently last year saw the largest honey bee populations in US history. Though they write that huge boom in honey bee population is a threat to other native pollinators, so I guess that presents its own unique problems.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 day ago

      Usually, when people talk about bees dying, they mean wild bees. Unlike honey bees they aren’t cultivated by us. They also tend to be better pollinators than honey bees, adapted to local plants that honey bees can’t handle well.

    • safesyrup@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The issue is OP is spreading misinformation. You‘re right, we haven‘t lost 80% of the bee population, because this was a hypothetical statement in the article saying it would have consequences if it happened.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Bees live less than two months, so if only 80% of bees died in the last 8 months that would suggest a sharp recent population increase. And even if you take it as read that it means bees dying and not being replaced, 8 months is still a terrible timeframe to use because it’s literally saying “there are 80% fewer bees now, at the tail end of winter, than there were at the height of bee season”.

    I’m not saying there isn’t a bee crisis, just that this factoid is very badly worded.

    • Akrenion@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Without looking at data it could also mean “beginning 8 months ago we noticed a downwards trend of bees compared to the prior year(s) that culminates to an 80% decline at the time of writing.”

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The running thought is these non-native European honeybees couldn’t find forage at the right times due to climate change and these massive commercial hives died of malnutrition. That’s why introduced species and monoculture agriculture don’t work out so well.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Okay, but European honeybees in the US aren’t exactly new afaik. That would be like if all of the sudden, 80% of wild horses up and die and the answer is “well, they’re an introduced species, so it only makes sense”.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’re pretty sure it’s the Monsanto pesticide and anyone who suggests it is hit with a litigation threat. Curiously, as we’re speed-breeding domesticated bees the wild bees are dying out faster, so as the bee population dwindles it also becomes more domesticated and less wild. I know that’s a bad thing, but I am fuzzy on the why details.

    I’m a brown thumb, and plants wilt as my shadow falls on them, but if you’re a green-thumb, plant pollinators, which will help the bees.

    Also plant milkweed for the monarchs.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some beekeepers actually mentioned that they’ve been scraping the beeswax clean off their hives more frequently because its known that the beeswax collects pesticides and herbicides over time which affects the colony due to exposure.

      The problem is its not just monsanto acid, there’s a ton of other issues also correlated like weather/climate, seasonal flowering, untreated parasites, bacteria, etc.

      We’ve literally nuked the environment so hard that even if we fix one problem, the population will not make a full bounce back (although I would think monsanto is the biggest threat)

      Biggest scam of this century was corporate produce monoliths convincing people Organic was about health and not the fact that it doesn’t use a scorched earth policy and scam one off hybrid plant seeds to grow food which has been setting us up for a widespread fammine for decades.

      Some random superweed is gonna crossbreed with some rapid out of control growth plant and wipe out half of the food chain.

    • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plant native. Plants that are native to your ecosystem. Those are the true pollinator powerhouse plants that bees need to survive

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I forget the term for non native, non invasive plants (naturalized?) but those are good too. Native is best, of course. I see a ton of carpenter bees (native bees to my area) on my red clover (non native, non invasive).

        • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Unfortunately, naturalized plants are not good. It’s a scale, with invasive plants being extremely bad. Naturalized plants aren’t as bad. But still bad

          In the end, our native insects rely on native plants (with extremely few exceptions to not be distracted by). A native plant can support hundreds or even thousands of species.

          A non native / naturalized plants cannot support even a fraction of that. They can also support… Non native insects. Which in turn fuck up the ecosystem, either by displacement or direct damage.

          I’m not gonna tell you to rip out naturalized plants like clover. I’m not gonna say you should destroy your garden. You should just know that native plants are superior in literally every possible way, and your NEXT plant choices should be as native as you can get :)

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            If you can suggest native ground cover that is low maintenance and easy to start I’d consider it. I’m not going to put plugs in my yard when I can just over seed with clover. Clover is strictly better than turf grass.

            • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It is better than turf, but I’m not talking about grass lawns, I’m talking about plants like for a garden. It’s better to have more garden plant masses, less grass lawn.

              Most people don’t need as much lawn as they have and reducing down to more what you actually use is great, but it’s totally situational.

              If you wanted a NorthEast suggestion for general ground cover I’d say wild strawberry. But if it’s like … Lawn then just stick with what you’re doing.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                That’s a good point. I’ve got a little 4x4 raised bed. I didn’t do anything with it last year and haven’t gotten around to anything this year. I’m in the south east. I was considering just dumping a bunch of sunflower seeds in. I’ll try to do some research though and get something better.

                Edit: turns out sunflowers are more native than I thought, but might be more Midwest.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, the domesticated bees are generally honeybees. And unfortunately, honeybee and wild bees don’t fulfill the same rile, so even if we replaced wild bees with honeybees 1:1, we still wouldn’t be able to polinate everything.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s Bayer’s now. Monsanto sold it to Bayer when they started getting heat for neonicotinoids killing all the bees.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ll hop in here and add that your locality probably does pesticide fogging/spraying. For what it is worth, you can ask them not you spray your property. Make some local wildflower patches in your yard. Less stuff you have to mow, more food and habitat for native birds and insects. It’s a win-win.

      • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Native plant patches can also absorb some of the harmful crap like pesticides to a degree. It does help.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    it’s the European honey bee that’s dying in unprecedented numbers

    but it’s not all bees

    European honey bees are the easy button for farmers but they are going to have to decide if pesticide is more important or not

    this nobody knows what’s happening is bullshit provided by the likes of the Monsanto and other chemical companies

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They (save for a smarter minority) are 100% gonna decide that pesticides are more important. Until they learn they aren’t, but it will be too late.

      • Rob1992@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The company that makes roundup and the GMO plants that can resist it will decide for them

          • AugustWest@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I guess I am going to be that guy…

            Roundup is a pesticide. It is an herbicide, but it also is a pesticide. As are insecticides, fungicides, etc. Pesticide is the catch all, herbicide is the descriptive.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Say what you will about RFK, but he’s broken clock right on a couple of issues, pesticides being one of them. Sure, maybe his rationale isn’t right, but his end game may be a benefit. Unfortunately it’s at odds with Trump’s complete destruction of regulation, but he (RFK) seems to be chugging along. I think making America healthy is good; I don’t think pesticides or ultra processed foods make kids transgender.

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m not too up to date with this story, but haven’t pesticides been used for forever now? Why would the suddenly cause a 80% drop in population?

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think bee populations are under threat from pesticides, habitat reduction, disease, climate change, nutrition, et cetera.

        Of that list, pesticides are probably the easiest to solve.

      • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        It’s not the same pesticides year over year. My bet is some MBA pushed a tweak to the formula for short term gains.

        resist

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        neonicotinoids were invited in the 1980s and it’s been recently understood that it’s like a forever chemical. it will get into the dirt and go through the plants and pass on through pollen

    • Flemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Finedust from traffic, mircoplastics, insecticides, GMO infertile weeds… etc. Bayer as well.

      • Colloidal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Haven’t you heard? Bayer and Monsanto are one. And Dow and Dupont have fused too. Together, Bayer-Monsanto and Dow-Dupont control over 60% of all grain seed production in the world. All your wheat, corn, rice… it’s all in the hands of these 2 companies.

  • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I was worried so I looked for the source of the information, it seems to be from 'Washington State University" from their website they say it concerns “Commercial honey bee colony”, so it might not be all bees (I don’t know enough to say what the difference is exactly), they say “60 to 70% losses” (not 80), and they also say “Over the past decade, annual losses have typically ranged between 40 and 50%.”, so it is probably worrying but not as much as the CBS article was making it seem.

    Source: https://news.wsu.edu/news/2025/03/25/honey-bee-colony-declines-grow-as-wsu-researchers-work-to-fight-losses/

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Part of the panicking should be wild bees. They’re dying at accelerated rates.

        We also know why, commercial bee keeping is part of it, as is hobbies bee keeping.

        And pesticides… and monoculture farming.

      • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t know whether you were satiric or not, but it feels like it, hard to tell on a text medium. No hard feelings either way 😄

        If you were “mocking my post in a satiric way”: I didn’t mean to say that nothing should be done or that it was not a reason to worry. I actually believe we should protect our ecosystems, but I think we need accurate data and this kind of posts, even if they convey the “right” message according to me, are misleading and create false information about what is going on. I truly believe we should try to avoid doing this.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This story is about domesticated honeybees, which have been declining for decades due to Colony Collapse Disorder and other stressors. Native North American bees are in their own long-term decline, with 1 in 4 species at risk of extinction. However, domesticated honeybees are tremendously important for the pollination and yield of many crops important to humans, and this population drop, thought to be the largest annual losses seen, should be considered in the context of the longer decline, and the possibility that we could hit a tipping point when pollination, and a crucial pillar of our food system, could fail.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    That’s $15 billion worth of crops.

    They just can’t break out of that frame, even when the topic is EVERY LIVING THING FUCKING STARVING TO DEATH.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The people need their ads (or whatever the reasoning is), show some compassion, in a few decades they’ll only be seeing the same Nuka Cola ad everywhere.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have a decently locked down browser and adblocker. The real page loads faster for me, takes no archive resources, and other have pointed out other benefits of preserving the canonical link as well.

  • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    honeybees are an invasive species, fun fact

    unfortunately they outcompeted a lot of the native pollinators so we’re fucked without them though