• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah, loss of snow reduces albedo, this increases temperature reducing snow. It’s a known factor in how stable climate positions are stable.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just in case it wasn’t clear, that’s a horrifying discovery. Like the extinction of all life on earth.

      • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        FWIW, the Earth has about 500-600My left before common photosynthesis is no longer possible, due to consequences of Sol (our sun) relentlessly heating up, gradually.

        Now personally, my understanding is that unless complex life somehow adapts, then that will be the end of such upon Earth, with simpler life presumably surviving for billions more years past that mark.

        Point is-- if complex life can survive the coming collapse, then it evidently does have a very nice, healthy window to work with. Personally, I suppose that might be helped out quite a bit by the ‘churning of the continents,’ in which landmass gets regularly cycled back in to the magma layer over the course of millions of years, with new areas appearing on the other edges, so to speak.

        EDIT: clarifications

        • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m enjoying the thought of our current planet being melted down into liquid hot magma and a whole new planet surface getting a chance

          • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ahh, good point, yes.
            I actually was thinking about those beautiful little deep-sea worlds when I wrote the above, but simply didn’t know enough to assert a dang-ol’ thing at the time. Okay, let’s see:

            However, although it is often said that these communities exist independently of the sun, some of the organisms are actually dependent upon oxygen produced by photosynthetic organisms, while others are anaerobic. –WP

            So… looks like we have at least *some* members of these little communities carrying on, past the death of oxygenic photosynthesis, which they evidently don’t need in order to survive. (meanwhile with anoxygenic photosynthesis carrying on for many millions more of years).

            But off the top of my empty coconut, it does raise a couple Q’s:

            1. Since there are maybe a dozen or less community members who live in these little worlds, closely built in to a commensurate ecosystem, would the death of the ones who rely on traditional photosynthesis bring about a collapse, either partial or total?

            2. Would rampant global warming tend to mess with the already super-heated, typically sulfurous nature of these worlds? (me, I would tend to think “nawt,” since they’re already so hot, but then again, I’m just some layperson really curious about all this, hah)

            Ah… those beautiful, entrancing little forbidden worlds:
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECBbAjoEHWI

            ❤️

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      But billionaires need bigger yachts. And more mansions. What’re we to do? Can’t sacrifice the billionaires ultra-mega-yachts.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s actually not clear at all. How did you draw this conclusion from what’s written here? It cites decreased pollution across the northern hemisphere as one of the drivers of this, for example, and how is that horrifying?

      • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        how is that horrifying?

        Daisyworld.

        Less albedo -> more heat -> ice caps melting -> less albedo and more greenhouse gases -> much more heat, and so on.

        It’s a vicious cycle, and there doesn’t seem to be any viable solution. We could put shades between us and the sun, but that’d probably reduce light too much and kill most plants, leading to even more carbon being released.

        We’re fucked, and probably way beyond any chance of unfucking ourselves. We let those pass by years ago.

      • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also due to reduced water vapor and ice cover lol. It’s a conclusion that can be drawn without much reliance on the article, which focuses a lot on specific climate model improvements and not the obvious concern: given our desire for the earth to reflect more of the sun’s rays and cool off, reflecting fewer and warming up is not good

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “The extinction of all life in Earth” is not a reasonable conclusion to draw from this

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yeah, between extremophiles that will probably outlast the atmosphere and the mesozoic having been pretty balmy, life finds a way. That said, complex life is about to have a very bad time, especially specialists that can’t handle wide temperature ranges. It’s an extinction event, and our species is gonna have to really try to survive it.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s pretty big leap from the Earth absorbing slightly more energy from the sun to “the extinction of all life on Earth.”

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Life is incredibly resilient, a ton of life is going to survive and adapt just fine. You think marginally increased global temperatures are worse than the Chicxulub impact? It’s crazy that in the face of environmental catastrophe people can still find ways to irrationally catastrophize

  • archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    at this point I’m fully expecting the only thing that keeps us from extincting ourselves with global warming is almost extincting ourselves with nuclear winter.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      We’re not going extinct. FFS, we survived at least one ice age. At another point, scientists studying our DNA think we were down to as a few as a thousand individuals.

      Humans are the AR-15s of the animal kingdom. Not the greatest* for strength, speed, vision, etc., but excellent at multipurpose roles. Like insects, we survive in any climate outside Antarctica. We can walk endlessly. I’m 54, not in great shape, pretty sure I could spend my entire waking day walking, stopping only to eat.

      We’re social animals who stick together when the going gets tough. We love fucking and we can make babies every month of the year, no waiting to go in heat.

      No animal comes close to our dexterity and advanced tool use. Stone Age man was more adept at tool use than every other animal combined. We’re stupid reliable, smart and tough as well.

      * OK, we can throw and catch like nothing else on Earth.

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        global warming at this rate absolutely does have the potential to extinct us, no matter how cool we think we are. Tenacity and versatility will only carry you so far when you fuck up nature so badly that all the things you’d eat for food are themselves extinct or almost extinct. At the point we were down to a few thousand individuals, I should imagine that the climate not being super hyper mega fucked helped immensely in ensuring those people had adequate food – you aren’t going to be running down a deer (or a rabbit, or any other wild game) in the post-climate-apocalypse world if all the deer are dead because the food chain supporting the deer population collapsed. You aren’t going to be farming because extreme weather variations will make it impossible, you might be in for a drought or a monsoon and you’ll certainly not have accurate weather forecasting to go off of by that point. Foraging? I sure hope none of the various food chains and water cycles supporting the growth of forage-able food has collapsed either (they probably will). Fishing? Ocean acidity, microplastics, and global warming are all fighting to be the thing that kills that off, take your pick.

    • cm0002@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      See we got this! We’re just going to get rid of mice climate change with a snake nuclear winter!

      They’ll just cancel each other out perfectly 😌

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Here’s the ad I obtained from that link…thinking what I’m thinking? Yes. Yes I am!