There are a couple of governance systems in the world. Parliamentary democracy, direct democracy, anarcho syndicalism, etc.

With its decentralized nature, mostly free movement between communities and instances, which governance system would be closest?

    • stinerman@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A federation of absolute dictatorships. Some are more enlightened than others but if an instance bans you there is no independent appeal process.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes of course. In the broadest sense. Thanks for pointing it out though. :)

      I am more interested in which aspects of the broader system resemble which systems we know of.

      For example, lemmy has countless instances, some are part of the fedipact, others arent, others again are part of fediseer, joinlemmy.org, etc.

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well, federations are a broad political system ranging from say, Switzerland (or even Germany) to much larger collections like the USA, the Federation of Russia, or the EU itself (which Germany is also part of). It can also be considered in variety of forms, say the UK is not officially a federation (not that I’m aware of at least) but it’s also a collection of various and at time very diverging populations and countries/states/regions, not all of them subject of to the exact same exact laws.

        • anothermember@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          say the UK is not officially a federation (not that I’m aware of at least) but it’s also a collection of various and at time very diverging populations and countries/states/regions

          Sorry for being that kind of nerd but I have to somehow, the UK is a unitary state, pretty much the opposite of a federation. Meaning regional powers are granted by the central government not inherited from its component parts.

          • Libb@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Don’t apologize for correcting my mistakes. I was not sure about that, and was indeed wrong. Thx for pointing it out :)

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pretty convincing. Thanks for answering. The city states’ infrastructure is built and maintainer by a small faction who also controls the police (by default, not unchangeably so).

      The larger group is kinda syndicalist in nature, no? Because members build things like the fediseer and adoption is bottom up, not top down.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Formally, it’s the Alliance to Restore the Republic. Mon Mothma is the Alliance’s Chancellor, which is a sort of association of rebel cells spread across the galaxy. So she’s sort of elected by the leadership of each rebel cell.

    Then on the starship side, it basically seems like anyone with a ship gets promoted to general and promised back pay once the Republic is restored. It’s sort of a gamble, but it beats smuggling spice and contraband.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t think you can apply that here as each Lemmy instance is its own independent system with no reliability on others Lemmy systems.

    An admin of LW has no bearing on the operation of ml and any disagreement turns in one side sticking their fingers in their ears saying “I don’t hear you”