• JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Honestly this is a great joke but also could legitimately be a good service for someone who didn’t feel safe walking alone, or needs help navigating

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Speaking as a person who does not fit the demographic for this service, the big problem I see with it is how you trust that the walking buddy is actually going to be safer than nothing. Uber drivers are somewhat regularly in the news for assaulting women and I know several women that don’t like riding them alone

          • BussyCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s also run by people vetted by the school who are also employees so they generally have other responsibilities and then the service doesn’t generate a profit. Which is a long way of saying it’s not even remotely close to being the same

          • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Not really the same. Charging for this would discourage people from using it. They have to make a choice on feeling safe vs. spending money.

            This gives everyone the option and subsidizes it to the entire community.

            This is exactly why socializing things like this is beneficial.

            Every service has a cost. That cost is the value of the labor being provided. But we decide as a society that providing services like this benefits everyone living in society. Regardless of if they use it directly or not.

            When people say “free” in this context that’s what they mean. They mean the decision based on personal finance is removed.

            We don’t want people choosing personal finance over safety or health. Removing that dependency benefits everyone.

              • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 days ago

                Glad you got that! Its a major point in talking about social programs. If you can see this in college programs you can see the benefit when applied to social programs as well. Not sure if I can convince you of that too. But it’s always nice to get a response of “that makes sense” in this context.

      • exasperation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 days ago

        John Mulaney has a joke about how his parents knew Bill Clinton that way, from all going to undergrad together at Georgetown. Apparently all the women loved being escorted by Bill Clinton, and the men were all jealous.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 days ago

        I found out in my senior year, that my campus had been plagued by a serial rapist for several years, going back to before i was a freshman, and the school had covered it up. I only found out about it when i learned that my roommate’s girlfriend had a sorority sister on a full-ride scholarship to keep her quiet about being raped in her freshman year.

        Suddenly, the pressure to use their chaperone service became clear.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        My school had a number you could call and they’d dispatch a golf cart with 2 student workers to take you anywhere on campus for free, 24/7 (minus holidays and breaks when University offices were cosed).

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 days ago

      Especially if they’d help carry your bags and whatnot; that could be very helpful for someone who has mobility issues or just has a lot of things they need to bring. Well worth $7.50

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      how can it be this cheap though? sure it doesn’t require gas but it takes longer so the guy would need more pay for the service right?

      • wunami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 days ago

        The business model is to make it cheap initially by subsidizing it with investor capital. So, the gig worker may be paid more than the user is being charged. Then, eventually raise the price once the user base is large enough and dependent enough on it (or the prior alternative is sufficiently put out of business).

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        If they actually matched up with the routes other people might take, I would do it. I’m always walking around downtown anyways, but I’m a relatively large poor-looking man so I never get hassled.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s at least 5 years old and it seems every single year the news outlets “fact check” it and declare it false.

    Meanwhile we have actual conspiracy theories on official government websites and those same outlets say nothing.

    I hate this timeline.

          • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Them: white Kevin

            You: dressed in a full body banana costume while awkwardly carrying a cinder block. Refuse to explain why, or talk about anything except a ranked list of the worst smells you’ve ever experienced. Destination is a closed public library at 2am. Say “well, it’s time to do the thing I came here to do.” Stand, watching them until they walk away.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    You know… There’s a lot of women that wouldn’t dare to walk alone at night. That white Kevin has been vetted by Uber and has a paper trail.

    How about not just a white Kevin but an Armed Stacey, or a security guard Michelle.

    of course, it’d probably cost MORE to get someone to walk with you because they’d have to not only drive there and walk but walk back.

      • SourGumGum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Especially because there’s a huge industry for fake driver accounts so literally anyone can buy an uber ‘employment’.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              If Jimmy shows up in a black Toyota Camry with the right license plate, that’s one thing.

              I’d like to think that if Jimmy is your walking buddy, you might notice these kinds of things, tho :)

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I don’t say this much but that is actually a good idea, considering the amount of people that live very lonely and isolated lives. Maybe this can help some people to talk, enjoy another’s company, etc. Maybe. Everything else the effing internet and tech companies tried only managed to push people apart…

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      Except that it gives predators an easy way to be alone with drunk women. I wouldn’t trust Uber’s security checks.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        You don’t have to trust the security checks, but they had to submit their personal information and documents to Uber, and would be easy to find if they did anything. And have two devices actively recording their location. That’s much better than an anonymous stranger, and I doubt a predator would go through all that instead of just, you know, remaining an anonymous person on the street.

    • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      sure, it’s nice to do something about loneliness. Makes me think of human libraries, where you can borrow a human to have a talk with. But please, let’s do these things voluntarily and not for profit. There’s something nasty about “I’m only willing to speak to you if you pay me”.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Isn’t that a japanese thing? With cafes where you go to talk with a person?

        But back to the subject at hand.

        I could see this as a way to get someone’s help to take some groceries home or some large object a single person can’t, as it is too akward to hold alone.

        Or as a personal guide or to have company to go to/through somewhere someone does not feel comfortable.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    For the first time, I saw a car with Uber stickers in my country. Wanted to peel them off, but I also don’t wanna get in a fight over it. Pretty sure it’ll mostly be used by foreigners because the local alternative has several years of advantage and is also a multinational now.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      friend, if i gotta burn down shit while facing forced disappearance to el salvador, you’d better be peeling the corporatists’ stickers off cars to protect your local alternative

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Friend, I live at least 7 timezones away from you. I appreciate you burning shit down, but the people who voted the orange fascist into power are your friends and family, not me.

        • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          America is so large that it’s very possible that person has no friends or family who voted for trump at all. I know I don’t.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Suddenly everyone is on their high horse about number of time zones away.

            Also is Uber really the number one corporation we need to be fighting right now?

          • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            There can be entire communities that know of no one that voted for the opposite candidate. That’s what helped feed the “stolen 2020 election” narrative. Some truly think that Trump should have won in a landslide because “No one I know likes Biden, how could he have won?”.

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          is your nation so removed from the world as to be immune to the resurrection of fascism and the march of billionaire monopolists? i suppose I’m nearly 12 timesones away from North Sentinel Island

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            If the fascists here take over, it’ll be the local ones tbh. But don’t worry, I’m already running a personal trade surplus with the USA. Trump would hate me.

    • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 days ago

      “In 2023, Uber reported its first annual profit since going public in 2019, with a net income of $1.9 billion. This follows a period of consistent losses for the company.”

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Never has been Earth astronauts gun meme

      No, but fr Uber is a masterclass in creative accounting and strategic acquisitions for further creative accounting.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      unlike other comments, I’d argue, like most tech, it was incredibly profitable for anyone except the people funding it.

      Business is not about extracting money from goods and services, it’s about tricking VC funders to give you 50 million dollars a year

    • theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hilariously unprofitable. They even came up with creative accounting to show how, despite never being profitable they may turn a profit if you don’t count their debts and losses.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Uber’s true business model isn’t in place yet. Eventually, all cars will be self-driving, and they can ditch the drivers. The ultimate objective is to replace personal car ownership with a driving service.

        Once they don’t have to pay drivers, and they have monthly fees coming in from millions of subscribers, they’ll clean up.

        • Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think you’re wrong on this one.

          Currently uber does not own anything. Repair costs are for the drivers. Buying a car is for the drivers.

          If they are not profitable now, replacing driver’s “wage” will only make it more expensive.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m not wrong, it’s on their website:

            Driving autonomous forward

            At Uber, it’s our mission to reimagine the way the world moves for the better—and it’s clear that autonomous vehicles (AVs) will play a part in our future. With that in mind, we have been building Uber for the road ahead.

            Then they go onto describe how they are going to use driverless vehicles for personal mobility, delivery, and freight.

        • nef@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          So their entire company is built on the gamble that self-driving cars will happen before their finances implode?

        • theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Thanks for the input.

          In my opinion, this is definitely copium on uber’s part. Taking on far more debt to try to be a public utility level of too big to fail is laughable. There is always an end stage they need to sell that is bigger and better.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      Their whole business model is “wait for self driving and then $$$” as they’ll no longer have to pay anybody.