• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Depends. You looking for a woman’s space…or a terf space?

    • tfm@europe.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I definitely think it should be an inclusive, not exclusive space

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        blahaj.zone is a great one I’ve found. Extremely inclusive, brooks absolutely no bullshit from bad faith actors.

        Is also very very queer tho JSYK

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            People are fucking weird about drag.

            Honestly there are far more worthy things to get pissed about this day and age, open a window

            • Yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I just blocked them and moved on. It’s just insane it took so long for the admins to finally ban them.

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Dragonfucker isn’t a gender, you enabling trolls makes LGBTQ spaces worse for people with real gender identities that experience real discrimination in the real world.

                I bet you feel good when the people you hate get silenced though, like a drug addict chasing dopamine.

                • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You don’t get to decide what is and what isn’t a real identity :) if that makes you mad, the ban was justified just for that,

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Either can describe a bar that throws out Nazis or a Nazi bar, depending on perspective.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Nah I’m demanding clarity. A clear question “Do you mean excluding TERFs or excluding women” and the answer is “I want to be inclusive”. It may not be meant as such, and I’m definitely not implying that it was, but that’s exactly how a TERF would evade questioning.

            A clear “Fuck TERFs” would have provided plenty of clarity, and been much shorter. Also, it would have said “Fuck TERFs”.

            • LwL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Idk man “exclusionary” is literally part of terf I don’t think there’s much ambiguity there. Fuck terfs though.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                5 days ago

                They’re also complaining about “women being excluded from women’s spaces by agents of the patriarchy posing as women”. They’re also not necessarily using “TERF” as a label. They’re using typical fascist-style “words mean whatever we want them to mean in the moment” type of stuff, hiding clear-cut positions behind pretend nuance, hence why I favour clarity.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    beehaw.org aspire to be nice, friendly diverse and safe. But they’re more towards nice, not women. And we have lemmy.blahaj.zone for queer folks. To my knowledge, there isn’t a place aimed towards women. Maybe heehaw is the closest… Still not really a fit.

    You could go ahead and also ask in some of the women communities, see how they get along here on the Fediverse.

  • Snoopy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This idea is pretty cool, i hope they will succeed to achieve that. Imo, we lack diversity on the forumverse except maybe mastodon.

    It would provide an additional security layer, another governance. They could also benefit a lot from local community and can check vote, email, ip…Other have already mentionned good example with blahaj, beehaw…

    On the other hand, it will render the instance more visible.

    On my main instance, jlai.lu, i think we don’t manage well sexist speech. They are moderated, we do our best to explain to our users what’s wrong and slowly change them but we don’t have the same sensibility as women.

    Men explaining women…So we probably missed lot things.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Can somebody explain to me a thing about anti-feminism: as a 99.5% cishet standard regular manly man man, even from an extremely cold, selfish, objective, all-for-me approach I cannot understand what I stand to gain by this. What’s the point?

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all of humanity.

    Asking for a women-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less men. If you’re implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I’d love to show you the Grey’s Anatomy sub.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      i mean, i don’t see anything necessarily wrong with it though.

      It’s like making a linux specific lemmy instance, or an anarchist focused lemmy instance (the one im on)

      it might go against the principles of lemmy, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with it.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think there are differences in the interests of both. Can you explain your argument here, without super obscure references?

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        We just shouldn’t consider either gender’s interests as stereotypes. Also, if a community becomes one or the other “centric”, then on some level, it’s exclusionary.

        • Tonuka@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          You know that just because gender is a social construct, it doesn’t mean we should or even can just ignore it? You took step one on the awareness ladder but stopped before step two

    • misteloct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Neigh, Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all the world.

      I am species blind. Asking for a species-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less horses. If you’re implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I’d love to show you equestrian sports.

      There is literally nothing different between any species, gender, or even a rock. Women, Men. Heck 1 + 1 = 3. Everything is exactly the same. It’s a soup of protons. It’s all the same!

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Reddit is pretty pro-female, what is this riddiculous gaslighting ?

    BTW, ALL of Lemmy+Mbin are pro-female as well.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    it’s called pinterest

    Edit:

    PS: Ok so it looks like people here are just as bad as redditors. I was answering the question in the Reddit caption of this post. Pinterest has been known to be an alternative to Reddit (as a link aggregator) which attracts women a lot more than men.

    This is a KNOWN thing, check this 10 year old article from the people managing Pinterest stating as much

    https://www.thestreet.com/technology/why-pinterest-wants-more-men-and-how-it-plans-to-get-them-13101082

    Of course women are welcome here, there is no question about it. Does it matter if there is an instance for women? I don’t even know, I know women who love stereotypical male stuff and vice versa. I assume anyone, male, female or anything in the spectrum, can browse around and collate their favorite subs

    • MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not funny, not ok. Women are just as welcome here as anyone else and your comment is exactly why they are asking. “It’s a joke” - nope don’t even. Be better than this.

        • Bouzou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well…yes, it is a link aggregator, but have you ever used Pinterest? The uses for it vs reddit are wildly different…

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes, I have. And the differences that you allude to are a huge part why women find it attractive, more so than men.

            Pinterest itself have publicly stated this was not necessarily intentional and they wanted to bring more men to the platform.

            • Bouzou@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I am more trying to argue that Pinterest and Reddit/lemmy are fundamentally different enough that they aren’t really interchangeable.

              I personally use both, but, again, for wildly different purposes.

              • Jhex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                I agree, but at a higher level the analogy works… like a sports car vs a pickup truck vs a minivan. Very different but at the end of the day they are all vehicles and men tend to like one of those more than others, same as women (and no, I am not implying women like minivans… my wife forbade me from getting one when our kids were little and I had given up on a cool car for the convenience of one)

                • Bouzou@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Well my argument is that they fall under a different analogy. Something like a car and wheelbarrow? They’re both used for transportation, sure, but they also have two distinct functions that don’t cancel each other out.

        • qnvx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Your comment can be read in multiple ways

          “It’s called pinterest. Go there instead. This site is not for you.”

          or

          “It’s called pinterest. This thing you are interested in already kind of exists. Just thought I would let you know.”

          The people downvoting had the first interpretation, I assume.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Honestly, I really cannot stop people from making up things I did not write and tagging them along in their heads.

            I was answering the question in the picture of this post:

            Do you know any Reddit alternatives aimed towards Women?

            The way I worded it “it’s called Pinterest” came from me thinking this was a well known thing which apparently is not for many lemmy users.

            Check this article which is 10 years old, where Pinterest representatives acknowledge this demographic divide and want to correct it

            https://www.thestreet.com/technology/why-pinterest-wants-more-men-and-how-it-plans-to-get-them-13101082

        • MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t agree in this particular instance, but in general I think you’re right - all this shit is really getting to me. And I always appreciate a good call out. Going to touch some grass, hope everyone has a great day ✌️

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    TW: crude and insensitive joke (hopefully the spoiler tag works lol)

    ETA: lemme know if you need this taken down. Sometimes the intrusive thoughts win

    !It’s funny, blahaj.zone is full of pussies, and .ml is full of cunts, and yet there’s no dedicated space for women!<

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    lemmy.blahaj.zone has a decent amount of women and both their admins are women, it’s not a “women’s space” as one would describe since everyone is welcome there but it’s probably the closest thing one would describe as an instance “by women for women”. I am obligated to mention that it is a queer instance and that many of the women there are either trans themselves or strongly supportive of trans people, and do not tolerate transphobia or anti-LGBT sentiment (including refusal to support LGBTQ people) at all.

  • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lemmy has an undeniable woman problem that it carried over from Reddit. I’ve lost count of the number of pathetic blokes that I have blocked on here for anti feminism.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      EDIT: Look at the responses to this comment for the proof.

      100%

      It’s really bad and lemmy is really in denial.

      Sexism here is much worse than it was on Reddit.

      It feels like 2008 Reddit here sexism wise, except instead of Ron Paul libertarians tooting their horns everywhere we have heavy tracked vehicle enthusiasts.

      I did hope lemmy having a left leaning culture would help but it does not.

      Try making any post that focuses on situations uniquely or disproportionally experienced by women and you get mostly “everyone has that why think about women” or “what about men” or “men have it worst” responses.

      • misteloct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh yea? One time I got kicked in the balls and it kinda hurt. Women have it soooo easy.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        5 days ago

        Try making any post that focuses on situations uniquely or disproportionally experienced by women and you get mostly “what about men” or “men have it worst” responses.

        that’s kind of just how controversial things are on the internet though.

        Evens shitposting from men will get similar responses from women, it’s just how it is now. Sort of always has been.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          THIS. EXACTY THIS RIGHT HERE. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I MEAN.

          Me: talks about issue disproportionately affecting women.

          Lemmy User: It’s not really about women. Everyone suffers from this.

          • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Lmao look at that douchebag’s comment history. Its arguably worse that than comment itself. God I wish there was a male loneliness epidemic because these fuckers stopped talking.

          • Amanduh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            5 days ago

            I bet you can take any situation and make yourself a victim

            • mholiv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Stttooooppp you’re giving me old school internet sexism nostalgia. 😂 That 2008 energy.

              Do you miss halo 3 lobbies too?

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            5 days ago

            yeah bro, it’s the internet, everybody has opinions.

            “yeah so actually i think this is a big problem”

            “yeah evidently it must be a problem, but like, this has always been a problem, and seems to be a consistent problem”

            “YOU’RE LITERALLY THE PROBLEM!!!”

            Lemmy User: It’s not really about women. Everyone suffers from this.

            also to be clear, you are literally straw-manning me here, i’m not saying that “men have to suffer with women having an opinions” nobody cares, it is what it is, i think it’s interesting actually. You’re the one arguing that because people discuss topics that they find personally relevant is somehow “oppressing women”

            I’m not saying you shouldn’t shitpost about that stuff in shitpost threads, by all means do, there’s interesting dialogue in it. I’m just saying this is a common occurrence anywhere on the internet, for any community. Hell go find a community for something as mundane as lego, you’ll find the same shit there.

            Not everybody NEEDS to have their own specific issue that specifically effects them for it to be a valid or real problem. I just think this issue is far broader than most people expect it to be, ironically, i could argue you’re literally behaving the exact same way you claim i am. Because you are, and that’s exactly what’s happening.

            Do i care? No, i don’t it’s the internet do whatever you want.

            • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Nah but have you ever considered that the reason that you think that there is a male loneliness epidemic is because nobody wants to hang out with insufferable misogynists?

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                5 days ago

                no, i don’t think that’s a reasonable answer, because you’re doing the fascist thing of “these people are wrong they need to change, and if they don’t we can justify whatever shitty behavior we want, because we’re morally superior”

                It’s not dissimilar to a lot of nazi rhetoric.

                I think the problem ultimately stems from a disconnect in social development through out society. Feminism has pushed women forward, successfully in a lot of ways, but it has also pulled men back, in a lot of ways, that’s not necessarily bad, but there is now a void there, and there is nothing filling it in, that’s why the manosphere got so big so fast. It’s literally capitalizing on an empty market.

                If you want to solve the manosphere, the solution is simple, we need to fill in the void, and fix this disconnect that’s been happening for probably 75 years now. How we go about that is complicated, and not particularly simple, but i think it’s pretty clearly evident that the problem is aimless/directionless guidance for men especially in the last 20 years. Paired with historically contradictory ideas of manhood. Men are supposed to be strong and protect the weak, but it’s hard to do that when they don’t want it, or need it.

                Once this void is filled in, this shit stops happening, simple as.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      yep it’s pretty horrible. any time gender issues are brought up there’s dozens of comments saying “what about the men” and completely missing the point

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    This seems like a very good niche for someone willing to do it. Problematic accounts could get a site-wide ban instead of each woman having to ban someone herself.

    • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      this is a bit of how Blahaj works as I understand it, so it’s a good model - if anything I would think Blahaj might already be poised for this kind of instance-level protection of women

      EDIT:

      one of the Blahaj guidelines does include removing bigotry, including sexism, and would be a candidate for a safe space for women:

      Inclusion and Acceptance

      Embracing inclusion and acceptance means listening when people tell you who they are and what their needs are. It means not telling people that you know their experiences better than they do. It means not gatekeeping experiences of identities of others. It means no bigotry such as racism, sexism, anti LGBT commentary, ableism etc. It means doing your best to ensure that you don’t over-talk the voices of folk who don’t share your privileges.

      That said, the women spaces on Blahaj are mostly for trans women, so a more general women’s community would be nice.

      • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Zero women have tried to make one so far regardless of how many would use a new instance. So it can’t be all that in demand.

        I think it naturally would occur if Lemmy grows in size. There’s not many people here to begin with.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Unfortunately it is niche right now in the fediverse based on the stats. That could change but probably requires a different approach to achieve.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would guess that most women wouldn’t feel the need to be on a woman-focused Lemmy instance for their main / only account. But, some might want an alt account to discuss certain things there.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          6 days ago

          While this won’t be the case with everyone, it was mentioned a few times in a post I made here a long while back

          https://lemmy.ca/post/9443464

          I’m a woman, and make no attempt to hide that fact in my posts. That said, I also don’t personally have much interest in talking about being a woman, so don’t sub to any of those places you linked.

          Over on Reddit I just sort of let people assume I was male a lot of the time, since it wasn’t really relevant to what we were talking about. But from the start on Lemmy I’ve made sure to call out incorrect assumptions, downvote and give a talking to people stereotyping or being misogynistic, etc etc. And the more of us (of all genders) that make that same decision, the better things get

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s pretty brave of you. It’s a lot of work to fight people’s assumptions, and I’m sure it results in harassment.

            But, you’re right that things will never change if women don’t do that. It’s a chicken and egg thing. Nobody wants to be the first to do it, because whoever’s first gets harassed the most. But, if enough people do it, it won’t be abnormal anymore.

            Good luck, and thanks for trying to make women on the internet more normal.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t know of any “men only” instances, the fact that it’s gender-specific is niche rather than the specific gender.

        • Tonuka@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Same reason womens magazines are more popular than mens magazines and womens subreddits and websites are more popular than mens.

          Maybe one day we’ll have full equality and it’ll be weird to think of “women’s spaces” as something that’s necessary. But it’s very much so today.

        • QualifiedKitten@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t believe they actively intended to exclude anyone, but there is/was Dull Men’s Club, and I believe they’ve recently rebranded to “Dullsters”.

      • Alk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not niche being a woman obviously. What’s niche is having a community exclude 50% of the population. Nothing wrong with it, but it is niche.

    • teatimeplease@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Lemmy needs block lists users can subscribe to like they can on BlueSky, it would make a huge difference imo.