- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
I already have 2 monitors (including my laptop screen because I’m primarily on laptop) but recently I tried using Google Earth on a desktop with a fast i7-13700 and a 1440p monitor and it was so immersive. If each pixel was 100m, I could see 256km, all with minimal hiccups.
It reminded me I want a big 4k Monitor for this stuff, maybe even of TV size.
Baby: costs thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars over a minimum of 18 years
Monitor: shows memes and games, costs a few hundred dollars for a good one, one time purchase
Obviously the child is the stupid financial decision
It depends on where you live. Believe it or not, kids still care for their elderly parents in some nations.
I think the key to this scheme working, however, is that you raise your children in such a selfless way that they would want to take care of you when you have nothing more to offer them. Which is to say, the only way this method works is if it’s not a “method” at all, just love.
Edit: inb4 honor culture. In the places you likely refer to, uncared-for elderly are considered a great dishonor. But also in these places, differences in social infrastructure and the parameters of personal finance significantly augment the decision. In short, it’s still a net cost of time and resources to raise a child, a balance that can only be paid by love.
I’m sure my daughter would want to. The problem is it’s completely unrealistic in the US. When I’m too old to care for myself, I’m going to insist on a nursing home. Hell, the LAN parties are going to be great by then.
It’s true. These days the average household income in the US isn’t enough for the added costs of elderly care without the supplement of social security and other programs. That trend only worsens.
I’m optimistic, however, that this will change as the differences in generational attitudes towards socialism are reflected more strongly in governmental policy. The baby boomers are already losing their grip on the levers of politics, and the millennials, in particular, are much more friendly to social policies.
That’s true, although this administration is perfectly timed to siphon off the largest wealth transfer in US history with the demise of the boomers.
True, though statistically it’s just cleaning the plate, as global elites have had their fill over many decades. Once people finally decide to stop pointing fingers at each other and unite against this scourge, there will be nowhere to run.
Afterward, global economies should stabilize and nations which start this process early will, I suspect, see much growth during the global recovery, so here’s hoping americans have some revolutionary spirit left.
My concern on that front is trust. After electing Trump, Biden, Trump, our allies see the US as a rocking ship. Our allies’ trust in us will take more than a term to regain.
Making a life-changing decision - for more than just yourself - on the assumption that they will want anything to do with you in 40 years is, how do I put this… stupid as fuck?
And that assumes they also are able-bodied, of sound mind and judgement, can care for any others financially…
My folks are getting up there in age, and I’m not getting any younger myself. They are religious, I’m not. I’m LGBT, they are bigoted. I can understand the big picture of caring for others through community, they don’t. They are still very capable and mobile, I’m disabled. What side of the fence do you think I’m on?
They could have just used a fucking condom. They should have. They didn’t.
My mom would straight up tell us we were supposed to take care of her when she got old, it’s literally the only reason I was ever given for why I was made. For that and other reasons I’m no-contact now, but it’s an incredibly toxic mindset and even worse that you’re inflicting that on your kids.
With all due respect, I think your personal bias is entirely coloring your opinion here. Most people have at least an amicable relationship with their parents as adults, generally much closer than that. Just because you have a bad one doesn’t mean people shouldn’t have kids.
In fact we need more kids, especially when raised by progressive people, because the fascists are having them too.
we need more kids, especially when raised by progressive people, because the fascists are having them too.
We’re not going to out-breed stupid or evil. Tbh, having a kid for the sake of shoving them into that death spiral is cruel as fuck.
…also kids aren’t their parents - you can do all the right steps in raising them and still wind up with a fucking Nazi once they leave the house, and now we’ve got a net loss on all fronts.
Vice versa is also true ofc, but please don’t crank out a baby just to use it as a footsoldier in a losing war on a dying planet.
I didn’t say ‘don’t have kids’, but you must realize that you are forcing a being into the world that may not see things as you do, regardless of what/how/why, and assuming they will follow an assumed plan that you have carved out is… controlling another being, in any capacity, that isn’t 100% concentual, is bad in my view. Hard stop, no exceptions. If that is ‘I don’t want to be your nurse in old age’, or ‘I loathe that you have created me’ or anything in between or beyond, is irrelevant.
The cruelest thing a person could ever do to another human is to bring them into the world.
Suffering and death are the only guarantees on this mortal coil.
Lots of good in between, but still.
The lots of good in between is not guaranteed.
Are you telling me that you have kids only they can clean your ass and shit when you older? And people here on dbzero is giving you positive feedback?? Wow… Fucking hypocritical people when it’s a rich the egotistical bastard so eat the rich but when is a normal person you celebrate it, such a clown show.
I’m still very capable of caring for myself, but I’ve also been caring for my mother since my father passed. It’s very difficult financially in the US. It would certainly cost less to get her into a nursing home than having to rent a two bedroom. Most people can’t even afford to do it now. The US is in a sad state.
So?? It’s not an excuse!!
An excuse for what? I think I misunderstood your point.
Me at 35: well at least I don’t live on the streets
Somebody now 15, when they’re 35: Well maybe I’ll get off the streets soon.
Assuming they are still alive, yes.
I took on a second, what have I done.
Here in Sweden I’m experiencing this with both older and younger generations. I know no one my age that has a kid, but so many younger generations have at least one. My little sister has two, and most of her friends do too. It’s weird.
My little sister has two, and most of her friends do too. It’s weird.
I suppose that makes sense. Support has gotten much stronger, in the last decade or two, for using multiple monitors.
that’s wild. i wonder why the younger gen had that shift. how does that difference affect you? do you have kids? where do you feel left out?
Breeder rhetoric targeted at kids that grew up with Web 2.0.
The world is already overpopulated so
is it though? pretty sure that’s yet another false narrative disseminated in service of the powers that be, but carried by well meaning liberals
I think so, yes.
A faultering population can be a factor in societal collapse depending on the manpower required to run the society’s infrastructure.
What happens when there’s not enough people to man the power station that runs the car plants that pays the workers to allow them to go buy a cup of coffee? It’s all interconnected.
Have you heard of neverending legacy? Its a (mostly unfinished) webgame by orteil42, creator of cookie clicker. Overpopulation is the real problem in the endgame, and its incredibly hard to cull the population without everyone dying of hunger.
Gonna need to push that space exploration budget instead of constantly going to war.
Then again, having more planets would mean a larger desire for power and greed would easily spark a space war.
Either way, humanity isn’t the perfect race.
/End rant
No it’s overpopulated.
The boomers fucked the economy. Their mentality is “FUCK YOU! I GOT MINE!”
At 35 I got my third!
…27" curved screen with 144Hz and HDR…
Not sure if he’s thinking about a second monitor or a second smoke.
Why not both? I haven’t seen that taco girl meme in a decade or so.
Ahh the PG32UCDM! This is best panel I have ever seen, I love mine but the only downside is when it’s off the coil whine is crazy loud, almost louder than my system.
Are there even coil-whine-less displays anymore ?
All of them if you use one of these
?
I mean, when the display is on
The commenter implies your coil whine comes from “dirty power” from your power strip (not a perfect sine wave). This may or may not be the case, so it’s at least one thing you can try out.
TIL monitors still have coil whine. Not sure when was the last time I heard one
That panel is as expensive as my OLED TV lol
Everyone here talking about second somethings. All I want to say is this is the baby with the most developed jaw, nose and brow that I’ve ever seen in my life.
Things really were different during our parents’ times.
Born a Chad like his dad, grew up into a Wojak like his mom.
Anyone here ever used curved monitors? I’m seeing them come down in price and wonder if it’s cool enough to get
I got one used, and not specifically because it was curved, I just wanted a monitor and it was available for a good price. The curve is mild and the monitor is only 24" so I don’t notice it very much. The monitor feels a bit flatter to my eyes than my laptop screen due to field of vision.
Unless they are huge and ultra-wide, I don’t see the point. They don’t add anything at small sizes except a certain aesthetic. At large sizes, it’s a quality of life improvement as things on the edges are closer than with flat screens. They were more expensive when I looked for them, so test it for the 14-30 day return period and see if you actually like it.
This makes a lot of sense, thanks :)
I hate them, wife loves them… so good luck lol
I like my ultrawides curved, but wouldn’t want a 16:9 curved.
I have a 32inch flat, wouldn’t recommend that size unless curved.
lol. I have a 50 inch flat screen on my desk. You can get used to anything. Though my desk is almost a meter deep and the screen sits right on the edge.
The color distortion around the edges bug me. The view distance matters a lot. Mine is on an arm, it’s close when I working.
Media consumption is fine
Curved monitors at 32" or less are pointless imo. But I have a 55" curved and it’s glorious. The immersion is on par with VR.
That sounds like a nice setup, and no head goggles
I have one, only because it was an open-box special. I don’t really notice a difference compared to a flat screen when I’m immersed in a game or whatever.
they can provide headaches if you stare at them too long (and are playing 2d games) (too long may be >20 hours)
Laughable, I think about MINUTES!
I had 3 by 23 😁
Still have only 2 kids though
just bought a third yesterday…
Lucky you! What model?
Nothing fancy, some generic 2560x1440 Acer IPS
I have a 4k OLED w/ HDR for gaming or whatever my main activity is, a second 2560x1440 for background videos, but I want a vertical monitor for terminal outputs and documents. Also just more space when I’m juggling a lot of windows
By using 2 small screens extremely close to my face, I can have a whole plethora of screens virtually. 😏
