StuartLemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours ago

I highlighted the VPN part so that everyone knows to not use them

lemmings.world

message-square
31
fedilink
0

I highlighted the VPN part so that everyone knows to not use them

lemmings.world

Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours ago
message-square
31
fedilink
  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Mentioning VPNs is also explicitly illegal

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Source? Cause mine (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50 aka the fucking law) doesn’t say anything like that.

      • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Section 4.37 of Ofcom’s Guidance on Highly Effective Age Assurance for Part 3 Services:

        In addition, service providers should not publish content on their service that directs or encourages UK users to circumvent the age assurance process or the access controls, for example by providing information about or links to a virtual private network (VPN) which may be used by children to circumvent the relevant processes.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s guidance, not law.

        • then_three_more@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Should, not must. Like the highway code should rules and must rules.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The Fucking Law does say that, you’re just not reading it closely enough.

        Source: your source

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Well, nope.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Okay 🤷

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Not who you’re responding to but techlinked called out that it’s illegal as well and showed the legislation text in their video. But if you’re not implementing the ID check in the first place then mentioning vpns doesn’t matter at all. I can’t even get your link to load.

        Edit: timestamp 1:50 https://youtu.be/uGJHzPHOFXM

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I don’t believe guidelines are above the actual law.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1k81lj8nvpo

            According to Ofcom, platforms must not host, share or permit content encouraging use of VPNs to get around age checks.

            The government told the BBC under the Online Safety Act, it will be illegal for platforms to do this.

            Ofcom is the regulator so I’m guessing they read the law a little more closely than you. And BBC states that the government explicitly told them it would be illegal.

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Reddit is super-screwed then because its full of users doing exactly that anywhere this topic comes up.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I very much doubt it has anything to do with being a citizen. The law would apply to the company making the statements itself.

                • Skavau@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  “platforms must not host, share or permit content encouraging use of VPNs to get around age checks.”

                  I’ll also note that this doesn’t seem to even be in the official documentation.

            • Rhaedas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Simple defense: “I wasn’t encouraging anything, I was just informing them.”

            • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Yeah, that would be the first time enforcement didn’t really bother to read the law they should be enforcing.

              So they might add it later when stuff like this becomes more common, but right now it’s not illegal, according to the law and disregarding everything else that doesn’t really have any legal hold and is really just a guideline.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 hours ago

                You didn’t read the second sentence of that quote.

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Wait, what‽

      Source?

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Source: Dude trust me. It’s not there anywhere.

Malicious Compliance@lemmy.world

maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

  • We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.

  • We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.

  • We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 17 users / day
  • 42 users / week
  • 140 users / month
  • 174 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 21.5K subscribers
  • 64 Posts
  • 528 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • dystop@lemmy.world
  • Kaiser@lemmy.world
  • Imotali@lemmy.world
  • archonet@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org