artyom

Okay 🤷

Yes. They do.

The Fucking Law does say that, you’re just not reading it closely enough.

Source: your source

Mentioning VPNs is also explicitly illegal

It hasn’t stopped anyone from using ChatGPT, which has become their biggest competitor since the inception of web search.

So yes, it’s dumb, but they kind of have to do it at this point. And they need everyone to know it’s available from the site they’re already using, so they push it on everyone.

I’m shocked.

Right, how does this image relate to that?

I know what rule 34 is, I’m asking where this image came from

It doesn’t dismiss anything. It’s just a statement of fact. Certainly in certain contexts it could be interpreted that way.

What’s Rule34?

Whether you know it or not does not change the message. Abusive couples shouldn’t not use this app, they shouldn’t be couples.

I really appreciate Matt’s coverage of emerging technologies but the sensationalism is frustrating. It bit him in the ass already with the whole solid state battery nonsense.

Oof.

tldw?

You didn’t answer anything about why they would care about PR. Is it your position that people would stop using CCs because some entity got noisy about them being used to buy pr0n?

a government agency can surely decrypt it if they truly wanted to

They can’t. Not using any known technology. Even basic encryption like AES256 would take 10^50 years on a supercomputer. That’s not even getting into quantum-resistant encryption.

Which has nothing to do with encryption?

I mean to my knowledge the US hasn’t tried to force encryption backdoors recently?

You’re being needlessly pedantic. If it makes you feel better, I can ask the question again:

How do they apply pressure?

Listened to the first episode and I don’t have any negative feedback. You might consider running your audio through Auphonic. Really great hands-off editor that can take quality to another level. But it’s fine as is.