StuartLemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours ago

I highlighted the VPN part so that everyone knows to not use them

lemmings.world

message-square
32
fedilink
0

I highlighted the VPN part so that everyone knows to not use them

lemmings.world

Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours ago
message-square
32
fedilink
  • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Section 4.37 of Ofcom’s Guidance on Highly Effective Age Assurance for Part 3 Services:

    In addition, service providers should not publish content on their service that directs or encourages UK users to circumvent the age assurance process or the access controls, for example by providing information about or links to a virtual private network (VPN) which may be used by children to circumvent the relevant processes.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s guidance, not law.

      • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Ofcom is the designated regulator and has the power of enforcement. The law doesn’t define what age verification means, only that it much be ‘highly effective’ (Section 12 (6)). It is therefore left to Ofcom to set out in its Code of Practices (Section 41 (3)) what ‘highly effective age verification’ means, which is what this guidance is. This isn’t Ofcom being nice, this is them telling you how they’re going to enforce the law.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Should, not must. Like the highway code should rules and must rules.

Malicious Compliance@lemmy.world

maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

  • We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.

  • We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.

  • We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 17 users / day
  • 42 users / week
  • 130 users / month
  • 174 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 21.5K subscribers
  • 64 Posts
  • 529 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • dystop@lemmy.world
  • Kaiser@lemmy.world
  • Imotali@lemmy.world
  • archonet@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org