Summary

Ukraine is hesitating to sign a U.S.-backed deal that would grant American companies access to 50% of its rare earth minerals in exchange for continued military support.

President Zelenskyy cited legal concerns and the lack of security guarantees.

The deal, pushed by Trump allies, aims to showcase Ukraine’s value to U.S. interests while reducing reliance on Chinese minerals.

However, Kyiv’s 2021 strategic partnership with the EU complicates negotiations, as European leaders resist surrendering shared resources to Washington. Talks remain ongoing.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Trumps idea here is much more than the usual Trump stupidity. First, Trump gets fat mineral rights for doing about nothing. The Ukraine loses 20% of its original (pre-2014) size, but gains no real security like a NATO membership. And the Europeans should work and pay for all this, while having no say in the whole thing.

    This is no deal, this is rape.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    The audacity to frame resource extraction as “aid” would be impressive if it weren’t so transparent. Ukraine’s rare earth minerals aren’t collateral for loans—they’re the spoils of geopolitical brinkmanship, dressed in the rotting corpse of diplomacy.

    Trump’s team operates like feudal overlords, demanding tribute from a nation under siege. Those minerals power everything from missiles to smartphones. Calling this a “reimbursement” is like mugging a drowning man and calling it debt collection.

    Now they’re floating troop deployments to “guard” these assets? Please. This isn’t peacekeeping—it’s a protection racket, ensuring the extraction pipeline stays open while the propaganda machine spins conquest as charity.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Trump’s team operates like feudal overlords, demanding tribute from a nation under

      That’s a very apt analogy. I hadn’t thought of it that way, but Trump’s demands so far remind me of his stupid nonsense about making Mexico pay for his wall back in 2016.

      He honestly thinks everyone’s just going to lay down.

    • Geobloke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I figured it was more like the tributary system in imperial China

      • laolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        China usually gave gifts back to those states which was much more valuable than the tribute itself. Koreans were famously abusing it by sending tribute multiple times a year. China had to put a limit on them because it became a problem.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s a fair analogy, but even the tributary system had a veneer of mutual benefit—imperial China at least pretended to offer cultural or economic exchange. This? It’s pure extraction with none of the pretense.

        The modern empire doesn’t bother with subtlety; it just calls the theft “aid” and expects applause. At least the tributary states got to keep their sovereignty on paper. Here, sovereignty is collateral damage in the race for resources.

        What we’re witnessing isn’t just imperialism; it’s a corporate feudalism where nations are reduced to resource farms for the highest bidder. The tributary system had rituals; this has press releases.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Fuck, everyone has been giving us communists shit for the past 8 decades for explaining this is the exact way that imperialist powers operate in their colonies. Maybe we all will finally understand now that the Ukraine war was never a conflict of Russian expansionism vs Ukrainian national defence, but an imperialist proxy war between US and Russia?

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If you’re being reductive to the point where you’re ignoring the importance of sovereignty and democracy, then it’s fair game to reduce communism to being just about some college kids that think Che Guevara T-Shirts look cool.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Hahahaha.

    Dude, like half the reason of this war is about control over Ukraine’s resources.

    It’s like his version of Putin’s special military operation.

    Special wartime profiteering?

  • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Poor Ukraine. One side wants to kill them all and steal the land, another side wants to rape its land, not to mention bordering Belarus, Slovakia and Hungary who are the bitches of Putin. We live in a sad reality

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      One side wants to kill them all

      Not that I like fascist Putin, but isn’t the civilian casualty rate in Ukraine extremely low to other conflicts we’ve seen recently like the genocide in Gaza or the invasion of Iraq?

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Only because Russia is failing to do what they’ve really wanted to do since the beginning, or did you forget Bucha.

        They’re still stealing children by the thousands though.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago
    1. Require enough support from the US to push out Russia completely out of ALL occupied territories, including Crimea.

    2. Require full and permanent membership of NATO

    3. Allow access to 25% and only from uninhabited areas that aren’t nature reserves. Leave it up to the US to pillage and destroy the country completely

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    What happens if he signs the deal, gets the aid, beats Russia back and reneges? Serious question.

    “American warship, go fuck yourself.”

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The US already abandoned their promise to protect Ukraine from a Russian invasion after they agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal, so I can’t imagine why they would trust us this time especially with a nutjob like Trump at the helm.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The US promised they would not invade Ukraine, but they never promised they would protect Ukraine.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          The US promised to aid Ukraine should they ever be invaded after giving up their nuclear arms. Go read the Budapest Memorandum, specifically section 4.

    • perestroika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Like a reasonable person who sees a proposal with huge future impact - he is likely consulting lawyers (“is this permissible by law?”) and other politicians (“is this a good move currently or strategically?”).

      Then comes time to present counter-proposals. One of them may be “we get considerably more help from Europe and they don’t ask for half of the country’s minerals - on this background, let’s revise assistance and security guarantees upwards”.

      Trump’s current proposal is such a poorly chosen one that one could show it to Xi and ask “for this extreme price, would you reign in your vassal named Putin, and cut exports of anything with a microchip into Russia?”.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    the ‘deal’ the diaper is working on between him and ukraine is a sham.

    i think the real ‘deal’ is between him and putin: ‘give us (me) half of some of the goodies there and we’ll not stand in your way to take the whole thing’

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I agree that the deal is a sham, but I think the goal was to present a deal so obviously unacceptable to Ukraine that they would be bound to refuse and Trump can then point to it and say Ukraine is uncooperative therefore he can refuse to support them any further.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Just tell the US they can have any resources they can liberate from Russia. We’d have tanks at Moscow in hours.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Which, seeing the treatment Ukraine is getting by the US, I assume you believe it’s a bad thing right? Right?

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The US only does things selfishly, so yeah. Though Russia really doesn’t have it better.

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Not so much about your lack of /s, there’s widespread russophobia since 2022 in the west and many people simply don’t care what happens to so+called “orcs”

  • aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Obviously this is not something you can base a deal on, but I think a lot of the stupid shit Trump is doing will be undone if the US ever has another election. So in four years, the deal will be overturned or renegotiated. Maybe it can even be declared void?

  • SilentKettle@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Handover the mineral wealth in Crimea and other occupied areas subject to them being under Ukrainian control but leave mineral wealth in free Ukraine out of the deal to provide some motivation for Dopey Donald.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ukraine got used to weaken Putin and now the US sweeps in and recoups the cost for free. Ukrainians lose part of their country to Russia and hand over the minerals of the other half to America.

    Imagine being Ukrainian and having died for this.