Welp…

  • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

    • ExFed@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      22 hours ago

      We’ll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it’ll just end up the same as it always has.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members ‘caucus’ with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

      • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’ll gladly accept a reactionary centrist spoiler party into the mix. Especially if it coincides with the Clinton wing of the DNC losing its ability to maintain its grip on power.

          • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The Dems who, since the shock of the Reagan revolution, swore off having a political project beyond “don’t make it worse” but accidentally foreclosed on making things better in the process. More recently, they’ve been heard saying things like “nothing will fundamentally change” in the face of a political situation that is very different from 40 years earlier.

            Basically all the powerful Dems since Bill Clinton. Groups like the Democratic Leadership Council. They’ll poo poo ideas that regularly poll at 80% support across all parties, then spend all their political capital barely carrying a compromise position with 48% support across the finish line.

            I really hope that we’re reaching a tipping point where people who believe in a better world and pursue policies to bring it about can have sustained political success

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yes, and without it, any third party struggles to take hold. This new party could make ranked choice voting a bipartisan(tripartisan?) issue since they would need it to survive unless they really think they can just yank all of the R votes their way.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.