• brap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      I only speak English and don’t follow this. I don’t believe you’re at fault here.

      • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        I see. So I think if I just let my eyes graze down the text without reading too much in particular, I can imagine I’m in a courtroom gallery, and someone with neither attorney nor soap is standing up rattling off nonsense, while some well-pressed district attorney is cackling in her head, at a nearby table?

        And that the judge is gonna throw this poor unwashed defendant right off Hell in a Cell, and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcer’s table.

    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is not a failing of your English. This person has strung together a long torrent of barely recognizable words, many of which are fabrications of the “Sovereign Citizen” movement (read; delusion).

      These are not real legal precedents, or even genuine legal actions one can take. He broke some law, and is saying that because he is a Sovereign Citizen that he is not beholden to said law.

      • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        I should clarify: though English is my second language, it’s my best one and my default one.

        I just like to think of these sovcits as crazy five-dimensional lawyers beyond my understanding.

        And of course, “I shall endeavor to improve” was said with the boldiest /s I can muster.

        The boldestest.

  • morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s an interesting and challenging puzzle in itself… reading through their delusional perspective, and trying to intuit or guess what was actually happening in reality during their court appearances.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      Actually, it probably did play out like this.

      The 10.77 implies that the defendant may not be mentally competent for trial. Which is what anybody would probably assume after hearing them ramble on like that.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Does no one on FB come along and tell these people they’re full of shit or do they create their own echo chamber on the subject? I’m betting the later.