• opavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    before that we also need to make sure superpac backed trash don’t get past the primaries.

    trump got elected twice because dnc has become infested by shills like pelosi and schumer while sabotaging progressives like bernie and aoc.

    pelosi will happily support ice and any anti-working class initiative as long she gets her cut. schumer is an israeli agent who would support brining back slavery if it allows idf to murder more children.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      25 minutes ago

      also DNC wouldnt even investigate the eleciton rigging of the machines, 2 times it happened until it was too late, they are totally complicit. yes we know they are going to get called out as rigging the electiona s well.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hahahahahahaha

    Not even if the Dems had the vote. I am positive someone would block it for civility reasons.

    The dems can not get out of their own way. See Zohran win in NYC.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      See Zohran win in NYC.

      Why? The headlines on lemmy made me think that he is the good candidate.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The dems can not get out of their own way. See Zohran win in NYC.

      So vote to expand the progressive side of the dem party

      • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You mean to say our votes can override an organization that argued in court that since its a private service they could just ignore the vote of the people and pick who they wanted?

        The same organization that always manages to organize and attack leftist like Zohran and Bernie but can’t find any footing against Trump?

        Yep. That will work. Just gotta vote harder.

          • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I really really don’t think that will change anything. People been trying to change the democrats for the better part of ten years.

            Name one landmark foundational thing they have done in the last ten years thats really benefited the majority of Americans.

            There isn’t one that isn’t a major concession that undercuts the original proposal.

            • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You’re right and part of that is people like you not showing up. None voting has had the most votes in all those elections.

  • razzazzika@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can’t Trump just issue an executive order saying there’s no more elections, or that Democrats are a terrorist organization and just like, not let any democrats win at all? Judges can’t stop his executive orders anymore… he could just abolish congress at a whim.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I am utterly convinced that it won’t matter, but damnit we still have to fucking try.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The seats that need to be taken I don’t think are sided towards the Democrats getting enough. States like Alabama have had a Democrat Senator in recent years but for it to flip from a Republican back to a Democrat seems tough with how divided and how far right some states have slid. (Nearly 65% voted for Trump there in 2024).

      Kyle Sweetster may be their best shot of a democrat winning , but it’s a long ways away and who knows what could change. https://www.kyleforalabama.com/

          • rockettaco37@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You.

            You said democracy isn’t real. I said perhaps, but also that the people of the United States shouldn’t tolerate fascism as it has no place in the modern world.

            Which part aren’t you understanding?

                • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  You granted I might be right. So I asked (first) what our options are if this is the case. You’re evading the question.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In the US? Or as a concept? Because I have a few things happening in my country that are the definition of democracy.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          High likelihood your country is not consequential geopolitically. That or you’re fooled.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Oh, so now democracy doesn’t exist if you’re country is “not consequential geopolitically”? Either it exists or it doesn’t.

            Nice moving the goal post, no wonder I have you at -20 net downvotes organically.

            • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I’m saying voting for class president isn’t the same as voting for the leader of a sovereign hegemon. Maybe Belgium, for example, has a “democracy” but ultimately Europe is a footstool for the United States. It can act ‘independently’ only as long as it pays tribute to the regional power. This is same for countries in Asia, the Middle East, Eurasia etc What use is your democracy if it functions within a false paradigm? The political equivalent of “playing house”.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                We have a “leader of a sovereignty” with a GDP above Spain and Australia, though?

                It sounds to me like you think not having a perfect democracy gets in the way of having a good one.

                • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Both Spain and Australia are within the United States sphere of influence and that’s just two countries. There are really only a handful of countries with actual sovereignty. The US, China, Russia, India, Israel and to a far lesser degree Iran and maybe Brazil. Even if all other countries were perfectly functioning democracies they would fall under the influence of one of these hegemons. This means there are things you can’t vote for and more often than not your democracy is only tolerated and often defended by a larger power that is a democracy in name only. You are a mock congress in a civics class. Power always wins out. That’s not a political opinion it’s a fact. Votes have little to no power. Hordes of enraged peasants DO have power which is why they are placated with activities like voting. Artificial agency.

  • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Turn-out for primaries is minuscule. If you’re in a deep red state that has fully open primaries, you can request a republican primary ballot. I guarantee if you fully look into every primary candidate there will be a reasonable person who is at least open to impeaching or otherwise opposing Trump.

    If it’s a partially-open primary state you will have to switch to independent to vote strategically in primaries.

    If you’re in a deep-red state with closed primaries, it’s worth considering switching affiliations just so you can have some say in who represents you.

    I know it’s like sifting through shit to find an edible kernel of corn, but it’s what has to be done to stop this in deep-red states.

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I honestly quite afraid they are gonna rig the fuck outta the mid-terms somehow. I realize I have little to no evidence to support that, but doesn’t mean it couldn’t still happen under this regime.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      2024 seemed to be rigged at the top only. That’s how we ended up with so many people voting a straight Democratic ticket, except for HitlerPig at the top, which Dems have been trying to convince us is perfectly normal, which it isn’t.

      Its one thing to rig the vote in one race in seven swing states, it’s another to rig 435 Congressional races around the country. That would be nearly impossible. It would take multiple operatives in every district, and at some point, somebody would squeal.

      The Senate races pose other challenges, although they only really have to identify a handful of close races, and make sure those fall to MAGA.

      The MAGA Nazis can’t afford to let either chamber flip, or the Democrats will have control of investigative committees with subpoena and arrest powers. If that starts, it will end with prison terms for many.

      So I’m convinced that they will “suspend” elections using Martial Law, or the Insurrection Act, or some other legal atrocity.

      • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        people voting a straight Democratic ticket, except for HitlerPig at the top, which Dems have been trying to convince us is perfectly normal, which it isn’t.

        What. The dems saying that’s normal? Where!

        So I’m convinced that they will “suspend” elections using Martial Law, or the Insurrection Act, or some other legal atrocity.

        They’re stupid enough to do it, but I doubt they’ll get all the buy in they’d need.

  • BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Ah yes, impeach the already twice impeached, 34 time convicted felon

    These cunts don’t care about law so stop taking the high road, when they go low, kick them in the fucking teeth

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well with a bulletproof majority we could do that.

      Not counting fucking piece of shit Sinemas/Manchins. Actual Democratic leaders. People younger than 65 who want to break this fascist headlock.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    vote like it in checks notes a year and a half… we need to be acting now and not waiting for elections.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Nothing stopping us.

      But a bunch of people around here have no intention of voting Democrat and so finding their person, getting the signatures, raising some money, getting on the ballot, it’s all going to take time.

      If you can’t be arsed to change your local party, find a new one or GTFO. Last August we had a truckload of people just proud as a pig in shit that they weren’t going to vote. Fuck that.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    “33 Senate Seats are on the ballot”

    LMFAO.

    Let me introduce you to Staggered Elections

    Only Maine’s seat is even winnable, the other ones up for relection in 2026 are all safe Blue or Safe Red states

    Currently its 53-47. Highly doubt that Dems can win 3 in Red States. (Unless we get a White Boi Hillbilly Revolution?)

    The House cannot block juidicial nominations.

    Judicial nominations are not subject to Filibuster.

    So…

    Not to be a pessimist, but…

    Looks like an uphill battle…

    😕

    Edit:

    Ask yourselves: Which of the red seats can Dems flip in 2026? (Grey ones are not up for election, only one seat is up for election per state due to staggered elections)

    Despite this, you should still go vote! But don’t get too excited. Its not safe until fascists are out of executive power.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not enough to just elect Democrats. Ok technically Democrats would have 67 votes in the Senate if they flipped every single Republican seat, which would be just enough to convict. But that’s not happening.

    Instead, there needs to be a movement by anti Trump forces from across the spectrum to primary Republicans and replace them with anti Trump candidates. That effort needs to start now.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Tfw electing Democrats is “not happening” but flipping a cult against it’s demented, corrupt, rapist leader makes way more sense.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    After what I’ve seen the last 10 years I have absolutely zero faith that Americans can make this happen. I’d actually put money on them continuing to empower the traitorous Republican party and continue our descent into authoritarianism.

    But I’ll still show up and vote against them, like I always do.

  • aramova@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Remember folks, every vote counts. We did this to ourselves.

    I’ve said it before elsewhere but it needs to be heard…

    It’s just wild to me continually seeing posts not understanding how this all works, and how it would play out. It’s like the people who thought China paid the tariffs…

    The house is almost tied. That’s who passes bills, handles impeachments, some of the most powerful committees are, and who impeaches Presidents…

    218 Republicans, 213 Democrats.

    Let’s see, take New York for example.

    26 representatives total, 19 Democrat and 7 Republican.

    5 of those were within 2 points last time their seat was up.

    People who think that New York is blue, their vote doesn’t matter, skips the votes for the House and Senate and end up losing a Blue house seat but later complain that nothing changes are literally the fucking problem.

    Every. Fucking. State. Is. Like. This.

    Apathetic morons who don’t realize that the president is only held accountable by the other branch of government then wave their hands around when they did jack shit to help put people in place to, are the fucking problem.

    District 3 of California was lost by 24,000 votes. District 22 was lost by 3,000.

    Those two seats in the house, along with the close ones in New York, Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Washington, hell every state… Are what makes the House of Representatives or breaks it.

    So, if you think that your vote for president doesn’t matter, so you skip voting and let these other seats slip, yes, you’re a fucking moron who can’t grasp basic concepts of government that are taught in 4th grade.

    And don’t get me started on the State House/Senates, how they define voting laws and voting zones and engage in gerrymandering.

    Every fucking vote counts.

    And until the country realizes it, and starts acting on it, we’ll keep getting the shit we deserve.

    House needs a simple majority, and two thirds of the Senate.

    Democrats would need ~18 seats.

    First, that won’t happen in 2026.

    Even the best cases make it hard to win enough by 2028. Which is why impeachment is just not something we can hold out for.

    Gerrymandering is part of why this is a problem, which is done at the local level, and again why every vote counts.

    How could it play out? Assuming some absurdly weird upside down world just opposite of what we’re living in, this is the only path just looking at the numbers…

    Again, Democrats would need to gain 18 net seats. Seats Potentially in Play (Republican Incumbents): This requires looking at seats up in upcoming cycles.

    • Class 1 Seats (Up in 2026):
      • Highly Competitive Targets: These would be the first priority. States where Democrats have won statewide recently or that lean only slightly Republican. Examples based on recent political history might include:
        • North Carolina (Budd-R)
        • Alaska (Sullivan-R) - Unique dynamics with ranked-choice voting.
      • Stretch Targets: States that are more Republican but could potentially flip under exceptionally favorable conditions (like the hypothetical turnout).
        • Iowa (Ernst-R)
        • Montana (Daines-R) - Depends heavily on candidate matchups.
        • Kentucky (McConnell-R’s seat - potential retirement changes dynamics)
        • Kansas (Marshall-R)
        • South Carolina (Graham-R)
      • Very Difficult Targets: Solidly Republican states requiring overwhelming Democratic turnout and significant shifts among other voters.
        • Texas (Cornyn-R)
        • Mississippi (Wicker-R)
        • Alabama (Tuberville-R)
        • West Virginia (Capito-R)
        • Oklahoma (Mullin-R - Special election winner)
        • Wyoming (Lummis-R)
        • Idaho (Risch-R)
        • Arkansas (Cotton-R)
        • Nebraska (Ricketts-R)
        • South Dakota (Rounds-R)
        • Louisiana (Cassidy-R) - Jungle primary system.
    • Class 2 Seats (Up in 2028): (Looking further ahead)
      • Highly Competitive Targets:
        • Maine (Collins-R) - Often competitive, depends on matchup.
        • Georgia (Perdue/Ossoff dynamic showed competitiveness, depends who holds it after '26 potentially) - Assuming GOP holds a seat here.
      • Stretch Targets:
        • Michigan (Peters-D currently, but listing potential GOP flips back if one happened hypothetically before 2028) - Generally leans D, but could be contested.
        • New Hampshire (Shaheen-D currently) - Generally leans D, but listing potential GOP flips back.
      • Very Difficult Targets: (Many solidly Republican states)
        • Tennessee (Hagerty-R)
        • Alaska (Murkowski-R historically, depends on dynamics)
        • North Carolina (Tillis-R)
        • Iowa (Grassley-R seat potentially)
        • Texas (Cruz-R)
        • Kentucky (Paul-R)
        • And many others similar to the 2026 list (SC, AL, MS, WY, ID, NE, SD, KS, WV, OK).

    It’s going to take an absolutely historic level of pain to both drive enough people to vote MAGA out to make this change though.

    The amount that’s being excused, sanewashed, and just drowned out with other absurdities…

    We’re on all on this shit ride until some new wildcard comes into play.

    No impeachment, no Supreme Court, no guardrail is going to change that.

    Something new and unaccounted for is the only feasible catalyst.

    • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m not American and I wish you guys the very best, but my expectations for the 2026 elections is on par with the elections in Russia. Every non republican candidate may end up in jail or out of a window.

      • aramova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Unfortunately as someone who lives here and has no choice but to watch it, I think you’re right.

        Far too many of my countrymen are just complacent in letting this happen.

        • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s not easy to take action that really works. Protests only do so much. Armed resistance is problematic and can backfire in so many ways…

    • FreakinSteve@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Totally get all of that, but U cant help but look at McConnell’s seat and remember how Schumer and co rejected the exciting young candidate and instead forced a PRO-TRUMP “democrat” to challenge him.

      It’s simple: if you think you can challenge a red conservative with a blue conservative, the red conservative will win every time. Blue conservatives are just carpetbaggers to the voters.

      The challenger to conservatism is progressivism. If you don’t actually provide a choice you WILL lose.