• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Buncha Jordan Petersons in these comments. “I simply wouldn’t find myself in this moral dilemma to begin with” lmao

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      We should probably frame all of lifes choices as trolley problem models. Speaking of which I’d like to proudly nominate now that our next president be Mr Shia Le Bouf, with carrot top as his VP. The two are obviously better than a third term for trump and couchfucker Vance, and we have to think of harm reduction. Do you want Shia or Trump?

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        If 75 million people are pulling the lever towards Shia, 75 million people are pulling the lever towards Trump, and 2 million are trying to divert it to a third track, then I’m helping pull it towards Shia

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        “Sorry, but your brake subscription has expired.”

        Also, that would require a Tesla’s systems to function, which is not a guarantee.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        trolley problem says there is never any sort of third choice. You have to hit one. Which is why it works so well in political discusisons. Politics becomes not the ‘art of the possible’, but the art of holding your nose and doing what you are effing told.

        So we are hitting the old lady then, right?

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          It’s not about “doing what you are effing told,” it’s about taking the action that will most likely lead to the least harm. Like, the resurrected corpse of Karl Marx would obviously make for a better president than either the resurrected corpse of Adolf Hitler or the resurrected corpse of George Washington, but if Zombie Hitler is anticipating 75 million votes, Zombie Washington is anticipating 75 million votes, and Zombie Marx is anticipating 2 million votes, you would be a fool to vote Zombie Marx

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            I think you massively discount the harm caused by allowing any zionist to win. What we need to tell our party leadership – at all costs-- is if they push a zionist on us they cant win.

            You get what you demand and you encourage what you tolerate. We cant tolerate genocide support within our own party as some sort of political calculation.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              Again, if 150,000,000 people are voting for a zionist anyway, then voting for the non-zionist doesn’t help anyone. The best you can hope for is the slightly less harmful zionist. The only way you can not allow any zionist to win is if you do something really cool that I’m not allowed to recommend

              You must understand that the average american likes Israel, and so any party that stops supporting israel may gain your vote, but they will lose many more

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      See, this one understands. Combo multipliers are important to winning new high scores!

      Ooh, an elementary school playground during recess! engages 4WD

      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        ALSHUALLY, 4WD drifts are less oversteered/less doublelaney than RWD (I actually don’t know if this is true, I’m just repeating what I understood of it from Initial D).

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          …but you don’t drift with 4WD (in this scenario), you change to it because of the uneven terrain that comes with an outdoor mixed-environment like a playground, where one can traverse concrete, grass, dirt, mud, sand all in a few seconds. Locking differentials are a plus if the vehicle has them, especially in sand for this situation.

          E: also the skyline is technically awd as I don’t believe you can disengage the 4WD. 4WD implies the ability of 2WD and possibly a low/high range gearbox. It bugs me that the show uses the term 4WD for this.

  • mwproductions@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still remember one of the questions on my written driving test from almost 30 years ago. It was something like:

    A group of pedestrians start crossing the road in front of you, just as the light turns green for you. What do you do?

    • Honk your horn and yell at them.
    • Nothing, just wait for them to finishing crossing.
    • Rev your engine to scare them into crossing faster.
    • Hit one to teach the rest a lesson.

    I was so tempted to pick the last option.

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    My truck is lifted so that I can safely cruise over all the babies in the road. Just gotta keep them between the tires.