I’'m curious about the strong negative feelings towards AI and LLMs. While I don’t defend them, I see their usefulness, especially in coding. Is the backlash due to media narratives about AI replacing software engineers? Or is it the theft of training material without attribution? I want to understand why this topic evokes such emotion and why discussions often focus on negativity rather than control, safety, or advancements.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s either broken and not capable or takes jobs.

    You can’t be both useless and destroying jobs at the same time

    • Dave Coe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      It can absolutely be both. Expensive competent people are replaced with inexpensive morons all the time.

    • medem@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Have you never had a corporate job? A technology can be very much useless while incompetent ‘managers’ who believe it can do better than humans WILL buy the former to get rid of the latter, even though that’s a stupid thing to do, in order to meet their yearly targets and other similar idiotic measures of division/team ‘productivity’

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      it’s not ai taking your job, it’s your boss. all they need to believe is that language-shaped noise generator can make it work, doesn’t matter if it does (it doesn’t). then business either suffers greatly or hires people back (like klarna)