• utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Great point, so are you saying there is a certain threshold above which training is energetically useful but under which it is not, e.g. if training of a large model is used by 1 person, it is not sustainable but if 1 million people use it (assuming it’s done productively, not spam or scam) then it is fine?

    • Killer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So you’re saying if 1 guy made 1 million results it would offset the training?

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Results? I have no idea what you are talking about. I thought we were discussing the training cost (my initial question) and that the truckload was an analogy to argue that the impact from that upfront costs is spread among users.