Yes and… Is he going to face drug charges.
lol
Don’t know why the media keeps using words like “allegedly” and “reportedly” when there’s plenty of photographic evidence to eliminate the doubt. It’s no secret this moron is a junkie.
“Allegedly” and “reportedly” are magic words that keeps the lawyers away, since no media company actually wants the liability of being an authoritative source of information.
Isn’t there also photographic evidence of cocaine use by world leaders? The very idea in an age of cheap-as-dirt fake AI “photographs” is hilarious to me.
Macron recently got caught. Don’t Jr got caught at a SpaceX launch numbing his gums. It’s annoyingly obvious that there are different rules.
No, only people I disagree with get caught with drugs. Other people simply have tissue papers or medical conditions.
Source for Macron?
From what I see on the google, it’s either cocaine or just crumpled up tissue paper. It’s likely the latter but you decide for yourself.
Yes I always guiltily cover my tissue papers when people enter the room.
You might want to if you are world leader, you don’t want people to see you’re a slouch.
Good point. I thought they’d all have bedazzled Gucci coke pouches, no?
I think this is what they’re referring to: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/14/factcheck-was-cocaine-on-the-table-in-macron-video-with-starmer-merz
Alex Jones believes it was cocaine, Al Jazeera doesn’t. I’m inclined to go with the latter.
Because it’s standard
None of this shit is new, Biden had them ignore it, and so did trump the first time.
Biden should have yanked every single contract, instead he made multiple and constant exceptions for Musk’s companies.
The CEO of a company with government contracts blatantly spiraling into drug induced psychosis did nothing but normalize it.
Like, why do people honestly expect trump to be better than Biden? Why would you ever think trump might possibly do the right thing after Biden wouldn’t?
trump and Biden might both be bad in the same areas, but Trump’s admin will always be worse.
I hope you are using “you” in the general sense. I never for a second believed the Donvict would ever do the right thing even from when he was a coke head in 80’s. He always has and always will do the wrong thing and keep landing ass backwards in cash doing it.
Source: we could see it.
The sad thing is, I think his sentences are a little more complete and coherent than Trumps’ even in his drugged out state.
That’s not a high (heh) bar to beat
I wish Trump would take some shrooms. It might make him more human.
I’d rather he develop a fentanyl habit.
It does help with empathy and unresolved trauma, but Trump seems to be so broken that there’s no fix to it
This because he’s the trauma. Inflicting it on everyone around him from the moment he was born.
If his mother took shrooms she woulda aborted him by blowing up both Fred and herself.
“Allegedly”
Dude was caught grinding on camera. Nothing alleged about it.
in other news, the sun is hot
Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives
In other news,sky continues to be blue
When people do stupid things you might ask them “are you on drugs?” Sarcastically. In this case it was a serious question. At the highest level.
Has anyone else noticed that we don’t have many dystopian/apocalyptic movies but way more documentaries these days?
so suprised… not. billionaires arent people.
Quite noticeable
Unmistakable, even.
What do you me-
Oh.
thats his cocaine binge. even DT knows when to not get high on coke.
Indubitably, some may say!
You know, this is the libertarian argument for drugs and hookers for me. This stuff is already legal in the US, but only if you’re rich enough. I just want it to be legal for everyone regardless of whether they’re billionaires.
Cannabis is the stupidest example imo, it’s criminalisation causes more harm than good, it’s the kingpins and people profiting off of prisoners, pushing and advocating for continued criminalisation.
Private prisons are one of the worse outcomes of austerity, it encourages laws like this just to send as many poor people to prison as possible just so they can line their pockets, the most braindead one being the conjoined enterprise laws in the UK, which is a perfect case study as to why austerity which is musks entire strategy for economic prosperity, is a grift which is only ever capable of working for your government if there’s a scapegoat which you can blame your economic strategy failing on.
The only real issue I have with smoking weed is the lung cancer bit, but cigs apparently are perfectly fine 🤷♂️
This stuff is already legal in the US, but only if you’re rich enough
YES! However, EVERYTHING is legal in the US, if you’re rich enough or have some sort of connection to the rich - see Jan 6 folks.
Using ketamine recreationally to get high isn’t legal
And yet, when is Elon’s court date?
If a law isn’t enforced, then it functionally doesn’t exist. If the law only exists for some of the population, then it’s a tool of oppression.
“What am context?”
deleted by creator
Well, not entirely. We can get into a lot more good reasons why drug laws and prostitution laws are ass, but, I mean, yeah. Being rich doesn’t make you above the law. If we’re unwilling to enforce it on the wealthy, we shouldn’t enforce it on the poor.
Without liberty and justice for all, there can be no one nation indivisible. Calexit!
deleted by creator
Look, I’m open to a more nuanced conversation. I believe in regulation, not bans, not oppression.
deleted by creator
Which do you prefer
- All laws apply to everyone
- All laws apply to poor people
- Some laws apply to rich people
- Some laws apply to everyone
Ya but just for the fun stuff like drugs.
deleted by creator
Because once the laws themselves make sense, it would no longer make sense to call them “drug laws”. They would be called “free health care” and “social workers”.
no waaaaay! really? wow… positively shocked
We know.
