• Gigasser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ehh we gotta keep a few remnants around. Think, if none of these places existed, you’d get neo-nazis claiming shit like “slavery never existed, there is no evidence of such a thing, where are the buildings? Where are these so called “plantations”. Exactly, it never existed”.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The slave quarters and other structures remain unburned, actually, so in fact the historical landmark/lesson is still there. :)

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Where did I draw a line, I just don’t see it as something to cheer.

            The state should have taken it as a landmark and kept it as a museum. The absence of visible history is the easiest way to try to forget history, people already argue that the antebellum South wasn’t as horrific as it actually was and you’re cheering on the absence evidence that exists without it. Ie. You’re cheering on slavery denialism via spoliation.

    • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Exactly, erasing these things threatens to erase history. Granted, this is a bad case to defend as a historical landmark of slavery, since it was being used as a venue and resort, and therefore glorifying a southern culture largely wholly made from the enslavement of Africans.