• ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        The only controversy I heard recently about her is she said something about how we have to ‘deprogram Trump supporters’ on a massive scale, and Trump supporters got all up in arms because they now think that the government is going to try to forcibly deprogram them.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Which she’s of course right about and they’re of course being performatively paranoid about 🤦

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          How is that controversial? People have been saying it and taking about it for years. I’m pretty sure there are documentaries about trying to deprogram COVID deniers and other right wing loonies. Magidiots are just the largest Venn circle of them.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Whenever there’s performative outrage, I’m always reminded of the West Wing episode where conservative women are mad at the first lady.

            SAM Why were there rolling pins?

            C.J. Brenda Swetland: “At this moment, you’re not licensed to practice medicine, correct?” A. Bartlet: “At this moment, I’m just a wife and mother.”

            SAM I don’t see it.

            C.J. Well, you got to want it.

            SAM Oh, I see it.

            C.J. Yeah.

            It’s such a throwaway line, but it says so much about political discourse and the American people (maybe it’s global, but I can only speak from experience). People want to be upset. They seek out reasons to be angry, because it validates their pre-existing hate. And I’m guilty of the same, but I’m working on it.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’d only ever hear about her if you’re chronically online

            Objectively false. They are presented as important news by some of the most trusted news outlets in the US and as such not only shown to those you’re condescending about.

            those news pieces are just worthless pandering

            That’s part of my point: she’s still considered important enough by the political establishment that they’ll present her most inane thoughts as important perspective.

            It says more about you than it does about anything else

            Nope. It says a LOT about her continuing status as a member of the political elite.

            The internet isn’t real.

            Once again objectively wrong.

    • S_204@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lmao. She’s living rent free in your head too.

      Imagine being so stuck in an alternate reality. 😂