By Professor Marc Murphy of the Brandeis School of Law

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how political cartoons work. It’s a format for making a statement, there is no requirement for it to “add something that words couldn’t”. But even in this case, it does. It adds a direct and visceral comparison between what Trump and his Republican cronies are doing to America and what was felt on 9/11.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s a mediocre cartoon. It’s good enough to post on social media but if I’m paying someone to make a cartoon for my paper/website, I’d expect something better than this.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        OP says it was rejected for the message being “unfair” and “alarmist”, not for any quality reasons. You are entitled to your opinion, but it doesn’t have any bearing on why it was rejected.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I never claimed otherwise, though. I said I would have rejected it for being bad and all of my comments have been my opinion on why it’s not good.