Per one tech forum this week: “Google has quietly installed an app on all Android devices called ‘Android System SafetyCore’. It claims to be a ‘security’ application, but whilst running in the background, it collects call logs, contacts, location, your microphone, and much more making this application ‘spyware’ and a HUGE privacy concern. It is strongly advised to uninstall this program if you can. To do this, navigate to 'Settings’ > 'Apps’, then delete the application.”

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The Firefox Phone should’ve been a real contender. I just want a browser in my pocket that takes good pictures and plays podcasts.

      • StefanT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unfortunately Mozilla is going the enshittification route more and more. Or good in this case that the Firefox Phone did not take of.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        too bad firefox is going through the way like google, they are updating thier privacy terms of usage.

    • ad_on_is@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      if there was something that could run android apps virtualized, I’d switch in a heartbeat

        • scribbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          I gave it a run on Ubuntu touch with a fair phone like 8 months ago… It was still pretty rough then.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        There are two solutions for that. One is Waydroid, which is basically what you’re describing. Another is android_translation_layer, which is closer to WINE in that it translates API calls to more native Linux ones, although that project is still in the alpha stages.

        You can try both on desktop Linux if you’d like. Just don’t expect to run apps that require passing SafetyNet, like many banking apps.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Every one of them can, AFAIK. I have a second cheap used phone I picked up to play with Ubuntu Touch and it has a system called Waydroid for this. Not quite seamless and you’ll want to use native when possible but it does work.

        SailfishOS, PostmarketOS, Mobian, etc all also can use Waydroid or a similar thing

      • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I have used Waydroid, mainly with FOSS apps, and although it has some rough edges, it does often work for just having one or two Android apps functionality.

        Linux on mobile as a whole isn’t daily driver ready yet in my opinion. I’ve only tried pmOS on a OP6, but that seems to be a leading project on a well-supported phone (compared to the rest).

        • ad_on_is@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          not necessarily… I mean If they run under the same VM, I’d be fine with that as well…but having a sandboxed wrapper would for sure be nice.

  • SavageCoconut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    5 days ago

    Google says that SafetyCore “provides on-device infrastructure for securely and privately performing classification to help users detect unwanted content. Users control SafetyCore, and SafetyCore only classifies specific content when an app requests it through an optionally enabled feature.”

    GrapheneOS — an Android security developer — provides some comfort, that SafetyCore “doesn’t provide client-side scanning used to report things to Google or anyone else. It provides on-device machine learning models usable by applications to classify content as being spam, scams, malware, etc. This allows apps to check content locally without sharing it with a service and mark it with warnings for users.”

    But GrapheneOS also points out that “it’s unfortunate that it’s not open source and released as part of the Android Open Source Project and the models also aren’t open let alone open source… We’d have no problem with having local neural network features for users, but they’d have to be open source.” Which gets to transparency again.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Graphene could easily allow for open source solutions to emulate the SafetyCore interface. Like how it handles Google’s location services.

      There’s plenty of open source libraries and models for running local AI, seems like this is something that could be easily replicated in the FOSS world.

    • hector@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thanks for the link, this is impressive because this really has all the trait of spyware; apparently it installs without asking for permission ?

      • Moose@moose.best
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yup, heard about it a week or two ago. Found it installed on my Samsung phone, it never asked for permissions or gave any info that it was added to my phone.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        yea i found it as soon as this article said it was on your phone spying on you, ALSO many people, like myself noticed the battery draining pretty fast too, this is probalby the cause, if it installs without your knowledge, i doubt the app is excluded from your "app battery usage logs to, like it doesnt show up how much power its using.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thanks. Uninstalled. Not that it matters, they already got what they wanted from me most likely.

    • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thanks. Uninstalled and reported. Hopefully they’ll get the hint. I love my Android, but this is pushing me towards Graphene/Calyx.

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    For people who have not read the article:

    Forbes states that there is no indication that this app can or will “phone home”.

    Its stated use is for other apps to scan an image they have access to find out what kind of thing it is (known as "classification"). For example, to find out if the picture you’ve been sent is a dick-pick so the app can blur it.

    My understanding is that, if this is implemented correctly (a big ‘if’) this can be completely safe.

    Apps requesting classification could be limited to only classifying files that they already have access to. Remember that android has a concept of “scoped storage” nowadays that let you restrict folder access. If this is the case, well it’s no less safe than not having SafetyCore at all. It just saves you space as companies like Signal, WhatsApp etc. no longer need to train and ship their own machine learning models inside their apps, as it becomes a common library / API any app can use.

    It could, of course, if implemented incorrectly, allow apps to snoop without asking for file access. I don’t know enough to say.

    Besides, you think that Google isn’t already scanning for things like CSAM? It’s been confirmed to be done on platforms like Google Photos well before SafetyCore was introduced, though I’ve not seen anything about it being done on devices yet (correct me if I’m wrong).

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      Forbes states that there is no indication that this app can or will “phone home”.

      That doesn’t mean that it doesn’t. If it were open source, we could verify it. As is, it should not be trusted.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          The Graphene devs say it’s a local only service.

          Open source would be better (and I can easily see open source alternatives being made if you’re not locked into a Google Android-based phone), but the idea is sound and I can deny network privileges to the app with Graphene so it doesn’t matter if it does decide to one day try to phone home… so I’ll give it a shot.

          • Armand1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            God I wish I could completely deny internet access to some of my apps on stock android. It’s obvious why they don’t allow it though.

            • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Check out Netguard. It’s an app that pretends to be a VPN client so most of your traffic has to go through it - and then you can deny/allow internet access per app. Even works without root.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Doing the scanning on-device doesn’t mean that the findings cannot be reported further. I don’t want others going thru my private stuff without asking - not even machine learning.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Issue is, a certain cult (christian dominionists), with the help of many billionaires (including Muskrat) have installed a fucking dictator in the USA, who are doing their vow to “save every soul on Earth from hell”. If you get a porn ban, it’ll phone not only home, but directly to the FBI’s new “moral police” unit.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is EXACTLY what Apple tried to do with their on-device CSAM detection, it had a ridiculous amount of safeties to protect people’s privacy and still it got shouted down

      I’m interested in seeing what happens when Holy Google, for which most nerds have a blind spot, does the exact same thing

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        it had a ridiculous amount of safeties to protect people’s privacy

        The hell it did, that shit was gonna snitch on its users to law enforcement.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Apple had it report suspected matches, rather than warning locally

        It got canceled because the fuzzy hashing algorithms turned out to be so insecure it’s unfixable (easy to plant false positives)

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The official reason they dropped it is because there were security concerns. The more likely reason was the massive outcry that occurs when Apple does these questionable things. Crickets when it’s Google.

          The feature was re-added as a child safety feature called “Comminication Saftey” that is optional on a child accounts that will automatically block nudity sent to children.

      • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I have 5 kids. I’m almost certain my photo library of 15 years has a few completely innocent pictures where a naked infant/toddler might be present. I do not have the time to search 10,000+ pics for material that could be taken completely out of context and reported to authorities without my knowledge. Plus, I have quite a few “intimate” photos of my wife in there as well.

        I refuse to consent to a corporation searching through my device on the basis of “well just in case”, as the ramifications of false positives can absolutely destroy someone’s life. The unfortunate truth is that “for your security” is a farce, and people who are actually stupid enough to intentionally create that kind of material are gonna find ways to do it regardless of what the law says.

        Scanning everyone’s devices is a gross overreach and, given the way I’ve seen Google and other large corporations handle reports of actually-offensive material (i.e. they do fuck-all), I have serious doubts over the effectiveness of this program.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Overall, I think this needs to be done by a neutral 3rd party. I just have no idea how such a 3rd party could stay neutral. Some with social media content moderation.

  • variouslegumes@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    I switched over to GrapheneOS a couple months ago and couldn’t be happier. If you have a Pixel the switch is really easy. The biggest obstacle was exporting my contacts from my google account.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      GrapheneOS — an Android security developer — provides some comfort, that SafetyCore “doesn’t provide client-side scanning used to report things to Google or anyone else. It provides on-device machine learning models usable by applications to classify content as being spam, scams, malware, etc. This allows apps to check content locally without sharing it with a service and mark it with warnings for users.”

  • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    Thanks for bringing this up, first I’ve heard of it. Not present on my GrapheneOS pixel, present on stock.

    I suppose I should encourage pixel owners to switch from stock to graphene, I know which decide I rather spend time using. GrapheneOS one of course.

    • Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve looked into it.l briefly. Did you have any issues switching? I’m concerned about how some apps I need would function.

      • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I did a fair amount of research before the switch to find alternatives to Google services, some I’ve replaced, others I felt were too much of a hassle for my phone usage.

        I’ve kept my original pixel stock, the hardest part about switching this one over was plugging it in and following the instructions.

        I’m hoping to get rid of my stock OS pixel soon, it would appear my bank hasn’t blocked it’s app on Graphene, unlike Uber.

        For the rest I’ll either buy a cheap af shitbox to use purely for banking and Uber (if it comes to that).

        If you’ve any other questions I’m happy to help find then answers with you, feel free to DM me.

    • SayNaughtOfIt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve got a Pixel 8 Pro and I’m currently using the stock OS. Anything in particular that you miss with Graphene OS?

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    I just un-installed it

    Anyone know what Android System Intelligence does? Should that be un-installed as well?

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Jesus Christ they’re like bed bugs

      Is it too much to ask that my phone only contain the shit that makes it work, and not anything else?

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Its a classic example of using “BUT THE CHILDREN” to be invasive dickheads.

        And it immediately reminds me of the story of the guy whose kid had a rash in the diaper area during covid, and the pediatrician requested pictures to remotely diagnose and treat, which google flagged as child pornography and called the cops on him, and banned/locked him out of everything (phone number, emails, pictures, etc etc) because he had everything on google.

        and no amount of the police, or even doctor, insisting the pictures were medical necessity and not child pornography would convince google to restore his acount or even let him recover his number/email/pictures/etc.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve just given it the boot from my phone.

    It doesn’t appear to have been doing anything yet, but whatever.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    My question is, does it install as a stand alone app? Or is it part of a Google Play update chunk that you only find out after Play has updated? My system does not auto update (by design) so I’d like to know where it sources from.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I went to it on the Okay Store and uninstalled it. It didn’t commission and so far all phone functionality is working funny. It seems like an addon that’s not tightly bound to core OS components.

    • TheWaterGod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m curious about this. I’ve got a Pixel 6 and noticed that the battery started going to shit about a month or so ago? I couldn’t find an install date for SafetyCore, but it was listed in my apps. I’ve uninstalled it now. It’ll be interesting to see if that was causing it.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      same here, i was wondering why my Op12r was draining like super fast, for a phone touthing 2+days(and im not even playing games or videos on it)

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is there any indication that Apple is truly more secure and privacy conscious over Android? Im kinda tired of Google and their oversteps.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      For true privacy you’ll want something like GrapheneOS on a Pixel, with no Google apps or anything. Some other ROM with no gApps as a second choice.

      Other than that, Apple SEEMS to be mildly better. I’ll give you an example: Apple pulls encryption feature from UK over government spying demands

      While it’s a bad thing that they pull the encryption feature, it’s a good sign - they either aren’t willing or able to add a backdoor for the UK security services. Then there was this case. If the article is to be believed, they started working on security as of iOS 8 so they could no longer comply with government requests. Today we’re on iOS 18.

      Apple claims their advertising ID is anonymized so third party apps don’t know who you are. That said, they still have the advertising ID service so Apple themselves do know a whoooooole lot about you - but this is the same with Google.

      Then regarding photo scanning - Apple received a LOT of backlash for their proposed photo scanning feature. But it was going to be only on-device scans on photos that were going to be uploaded to iCloud (so disabling iCloud would disable it too) and it was only going to report you if you had a LOT of child pornography on your phone - otherwise it was, supposedly, going to do absolutely nothing about the photos. It wasn’t even supposed to be a categorization model, just a “Does this match known CSAM?” filter. Google and Microsoft had already implemented something similar, except they didn’t scan your shit on-device.

      At the end of the day, Apple might be a bit more private, but it’s a wash. It’s not transparent and neither is Google. I like using their devices. Sometimes I miss the freedom of custom ROMs, but my damn banking apps stopped working on Lineage and I couldn’t be arsed to start using the banks’ mobile websites again like I’d done in the past. So I moved to iOS, as Oneplus had completely botched their Android experience in the meantime while I’d been using Lineage so I was kinda pissed at what I had considered one of the last remaining decent Android manufacturers (Sonys are overpriced and I will never own a Samsung, I hate them, I didn’t like my Huawei or Xiaomi much either).

      So if you want to run custom ROMs, get a Pixel or something. If not, Apple is as good a choice as Android. A couple of years ago it was the better choice even, as you’d get longer software support, but now the others have started catching up due to all the consumer outrage.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The short answer is: Apple collects much of the same data as any other modern tech composite, but their “walled garden” strategy means that for the most part only THEY have access to that info.

      It’s technically lower risk since fewer parties have access to the data, but philosophically just about equally as bad because they aren’t doing this out of any real love for privacy (despite what their marketing department might claim)

  • Event_Horizon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    It didn’t appear in my apps list so I thought it wasn’t installed. But when I searched for the app name it appears. So be aware.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Play Store, it doesn’t show in local search results, but they list it as installed.

        • A_A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Even worse, i found this comment in the app store and it did the same on my device :

          Installed automatically without my knowledge, no notification, only found it because of a friend’s post, and even then, you only see it through a link, it doesn’t come up in your app list or a search of the Google play store. I thought it felt like my battery was draining a little quicker too, which is apparently also something noticed in connection to having this app. Uninstalling.

          The app can be found here :
          https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.safetycore
          .

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            i was able to find it on my oneplus, and i also noticed, why is my oneplus 12r draining so fast?

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        you can look it up on your app managment settings too, search for it there.