Time of death: 4:22 PM UTC September 26th

Notes, please read:

For those of you who don’t know, HWID was the holy grail for Windows activation, letting you generate licenses straight from Microsoft licensing servers, being registered as fully legitimate in microsofts servers and letting you keep the activation permanently, even after windows reinstalls being completely undetectable and with nothing on your system being modified. If you’re still using outdated activation methods and you missed out on this, I’m sorry

Existing HWID licenses are left unaffected. Only new requests are blocked, no licenses were revoked.

By the way, MAS still works and is the best option for Windows/Office activation. For permanent Office activation use it’s Ohook method (supports subscription products such as 365 as well) and KMS38 for Windows

ALL OTHER ACTIVATION METHODS ARE STILL WORKING, ONLY METHOD AFFECTED IS HWID.

All HWID activators are affected, not only MAS

Around that time, Microsoft servers unexpectedly started blocking the licensing requests HWID activation method sends to Microsoft. This was a slow rollout that spanned over a few hours, at the moment the exploit is completely dead. The best options for Windows activation now is KMS38 or vlmcsd.

Patching this would boost illegal key reselling websites which causes more harm to Microsoft than HWID exploit. We can only wonder why they patched this.

{“code”:“BadRequest”,“data”:[],“details”:[],“innererror”:{“code”:“PermanentTSLRejection”,“data”:[],“details”:[{“code”:“113”,“message”:“avsErrorCode”,“target”:null}],“message”:“The Purchase Service rejected the provided TSL; the client should destroy the TSL.”,“source”:“PurchaseFD”},“message”:“The calling client sent a bad request to the service.”,“source”:“PurchaseFD”}

TLS=Temporary Signed License=The tickets HWID activation sends. Microsoft servers are now just responding with “kill it.”

Transferring existing HWID licenses to other computers using Microsoft account is broken too.

    • Polar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ya! And then just quit my job, since none of it runs on Linux.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t? Are you assuming because I clicked a random post I saw on the active tab that I run pirated Windows?

          • ugo@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Then why would you need to quit your job if you installed Linux on your personal devices?

            You are the one that brought up that installing Linux would require you to quit your job, on a post announcing that one method to pirate windows no longer works, implying that either you use pirated windows at work, or your employer has the right to fire you if you install Linux on your personal devices.

            Since the latter is extremely bonkers and, quite frankly, unheard of, assuming the former seems much more reasonable. Especially considering that tons of people do indeed run pirated windows at work, and I myself witnessed as much.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Or… Linux can’t run the software and hardware I require for my job? I literally said in the original comment.

              I also have my own business. I don’t have a boss.

              • ugo@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                So, again, you are either implying that you run pirated windows on your work machine, or you are saying you can’t install Linux on your work machine. Neither is what this is being discussed. Having a boss is completely irrelevant

                • Polar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  … I genuinely don’t understand how you jumped to those conclusions. You’re a troll.

              • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                What software do you require for your job that you’re a business owner that won’t run on linux? Or are you just a troll?

                • Polar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Roland Versa Studio.

                  Cut Master 4

                  Affinity Designer

                  Adobe Illustrator

                  Do you call everyone a troll that isn’t a Linux fanboy like you?

                  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Nope. I just call trolls trolls. I don’t care what OS you use, I prefer my OS to do what I ask it to do without watching and reporting what I do.

      • AlmightyTritan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean if you’re already using a Windows machine for work you’re not gonna have to switch.

        I imagine unless you’re self employed, you are probably given a machine to work on with a predefined operating system picked by your employer. If someone is in a place where they’re forced to use windows and the employer is making them pay for this equipment and software out of pocket, then that’s wicked scummy of the employer.

        I’m just saying this cause I imagine the original comment your replying to has some implicit context of “when possible” or “on my own machine”.

        Also it’s a bummer your software doesn’t work on Linux, nothing worse than being locked into a platform.

        • SatyrSack@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I imagine unless you’re self employed, you are probably given a machine to work on with a predefined operating system picked by your employer.

          And it’s all managed by the IT department. I use Linux on all my personal devices, but on my work computer, I don’t deal with ads, bloatware, or most other things that people complain about Windows because IT took care of that already through group policy and whatnot.

          • ugo@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            My IT department likes to install antivirus software that makes it impossible to do your job because it will scan every compiled object file, inflating compilation times by an order of magnitude, even for distributed compilation jobs.

            Or stupid “workspace management” software that will randomly uninstall work-related software and / or reboot your machine whenever it pleases.

            Luckily I can use Linux at work, otherwise I’d have to either quit or tamper with my work machine to do my job.

            And yes, the IT department knows. But they are always “understaffed” to fix stuff. Curiously, they are never understaffed to roll out new stuff that doesn’t work though.