• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If a headline is click bait, you can’t really expect the rest of the article to be honest and straightforward either. If that’s not convincing enough, you can always find a few websites that rate news sites and see what they have to say about them.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Journalists write articles, editors write headlines. These two roles have different motivations, but it doesnt mean a editor making a clikbait title detracts from a reporter’s journalist integrity.

        Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            People’s habits have nothing to do with a journalist’s quailty of work. A fine article not read is still a fine article.

            • criitz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A fine article is less likely to have a clickbait headline than a clickbait article is. So it’s a decent correlation.

            • freecandy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Reporting can 100% be clean and fair even with bad headlines.”

              This is the part I disagree with. People are very often misled by bogus clickbait headlines.