• Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I said it before and I will keep saying it. Any legitimate outlet would be boycotting the Whitehouse in solidarity with the AP till the AP is allowed back in. If you aren’t allowed to push back against their lies and misinformation without fear of reprisals. Then what’s the point of attending? You’re just giving legitimacy to the propaganda. Walk away and let it devolve into an embarrassing circus of no names and bigots whom no one respects.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think there are many legitimate outlets. The ones that are probably aren’t on their radar because they lack influence.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s a terrible idea. We need real news reporting on their going ons.

      You’re just giving legitimacy to the propaganda

      No, it’s reporting on what they’re saying. And what they say matters, a lot. He’s the president. It’s not going to devolve into a circus it’s going to devolve into genocide and we needs news every step of the way reporting on it.

      Trump doesn’t give a shit about a boycott. He’d be happy, even.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They can 100% report on the goings on without even being in there. All that’s being aired in there are lies.

        One of the core tools of fascism and propaganda is repetition. All of these Outlets just reporting what they say, fulfill this succinctly. Fuck what they say. It doesn’t mean anything anyway.

        And you are right about the fact that Trump won’t care in the least. That is undeniably true. And not at all the point of such a boycott. Trump will happily fill it with ass kissers and yes men just like he has everything else. But when that’s all that’s there. It sort of becomes obvious what a joke it all is. When long time conservatives have to question who the hell cat turd is and what his credentials are to be in the White House Press pool. It will wake a few people up. A few that would never snapped out of it as long as CBS, NBC, ABC continue to let the Whitehouse use whatever reputation these outlets have left to pretend to have any legitimacy.

        If you are simply reporting and ultimately repeating what a fascist says. You’re part of the problem.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It doesn’t mean anything anyway.

          It often literally does

          If you are simply reporting and ultimately repeating what a fascist says

          It’s not just repeating if you had detail onto it, of the issues and effects.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t get “real news reporting” at the subject’s press briefing. You get whatever bullshit story the subject wants you to report, and the spin they want you to impart.

        Everything that occurs in the press room is complete bullshit.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    3 days ago

    The administration was not only keeping the AP out of the press pool — the daily rotating group of reporters who get access to Trump in tight spaces that cannot accommodate the entire press corps — but removing the permanent “wire service” spot as well. That means there will no longer be a spot guaranteed for one of the wire services: the AP, Reuters and Bloomberg.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 days ago

    Note that all of this is in direct violation of court orders. Just in case you thought the courts meant fucking anything anymore for the ruling regime. And it is a ruling regime at this point.

  • Liljekonvalj@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Wasn’t freedom of speech a huge deal with these guys?.. Now its controlled speech?.. How is this legal? How is this real?

    • libertyforever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Nobody is stopping AP from reporting the news. What they did was completely legal. Not sure why WHCA thinks they have monopoly power. They don’t.

      • Liljekonvalj@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What? I mean, how can a president choose what questions or choose only favorable news outlets? I understand that in America it’s red against blue with the news, but this just doesn’t make sense to me. Neither does the fact that he can choose like this. It’s very strange to begin with.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Surprise, it was freeze peaches the whole time just like every leftist ever scrawled about it.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      How is this legal?

      Having a spot in the white house press pool is legally a privilege, not a right. The AP can still operate and write whatever they like, they’re just not invited to exclusive press briefings.

      This is a long-standing conflict of interest that incentivizes the press to field softball questions and avoid writing critical stories in hopes of getting priority treatment from the government, but typically it works in a more subtle way.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean, I guess you could look at it that way, to an extent. But the larger effect is that it reinforces the threat against every other major news outlet, in a very blunt and overt way.

          I don’t expect the AP to suddenly radicalize over it or anything.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    basically like SC2 sc2 where mengsk has his goons to suppress the reporters from his administration, and his famous qoute is similar to trumps.