"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 days agoHorrorlemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageHorrorlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareNoobnarski@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 days agoI’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.
minus-squareMeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 days agoMaybe they thought we’d have discovered/created new elements by now that could do this.
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-25 days agoWell, if we used a pure vacuum, you’d only get about 17% more efficiency than just using helium I think
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoHalf hydrogen! Or the rare molecule, puffy air.
I’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.
Maybe they thought we’d have discovered/created new elements by now that could do this.
Well, if we used a pure vacuum, you’d only get about 17% more efficiency than just using helium I think
Half hydrogen! Or the rare molecule, puffy air.