• CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s hurtful that they think I’d even be threatening and nasty. That they just immediately assume I’m some kind of monster. It makes me feel like I have no value.

    • noretus@crazypeople.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t know that anyone who responds this way actually thinks this. There are a limited amount of ways to communicate that they’re not interested and over-explaining and hedging their niceness would also just backfire. They gave exactly as much explanation as needed. It may come off a bit stiff because the tone is neutral (and they only use “I” sentences - speaking only what they know to be true instead of projecting with “you” sentences).

      You may want more validation and that’s fine. But nobody owes it to you. You say “they just immediately assume I’m some kind of monster” - but you could be doing the same thing in assuming their motivations when they only speak neutrally.

      • threeshortwords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        You may want more validation and that’s fine. But nobody owes it to you.

        To repeat the exact point of your comment, you don’t know that the person you’re responding to actually thinks this or deserves this characterization. It is extremely uncharitable.

        To make my own uncharitable characterization, It sounds a lot like bullying someone with therapy speak for stepping out of line.

        assuming their motivations when they only speak neutrally.

        And yet not a single response can be seen in this vein on comment after comment from the clear majority repeating over and over that the woman is protecting herself from bodily harm by speaking this way. Nobody seems to be telling them that they’re making assumptions. Only this guy gets this response.

        In conclusion, as naive and simple as it sounds, let’s just be fucking nice to each other. Even to those you imagine deserve no respect or ‘special treatment’ (which is usually code for respect).

        Internalizing that last bit is something I really wish more worked very hard to do. And it is very hard. I’m probably screwing it up here. But I’m trying. For what that’s worth.

        • noretus@crazypeople.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          To repeat the exact point of your comment, you don’t know that the person you’re responding to actually thinks this or deserves this characterization.

          Which is why I said “you may”. I didn’t claim that he does. But if he does, it’s okay to do so. However, most people appreciate some kind of validation. You seem to think that entertaining this characterization is “uncharitable”. This wasn’t my intention, quite the opposite.

          And yet not a single response can be seen in this vein on comment after comment from the clear majority repeating over and over that the woman is protecting herself from bodily harm by speaking this way. Nobody seems to be telling them that they’re making assumptions. Only this guy gets this response.

          Why didn’t you either?

          In conclusion, as naive and simple as it sounds, let’s just be fucking nice to each other. Even to those you imagine deserve no respect or ‘special treatment’ (which is usually code for respect).

          Internalizing that last bit is something I really wish more worked very hard to do. And it is very hard. I’m probably screwing it up here. But I’m trying. For what that’s worth.

          Thank you, I can tell you’re trying.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nobody deserves to be judged for the circumstances of their birth. If you make any exceptions, you’re breaking the social contract and nobody is obliged to tolerate you.

        • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          nobody said anything about circumstances. this is about men not doing shit about the patriarchy while at the same time painting themselves as the victims of it

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            nobody said anything about circumstances

            Being born a man is a circumstance, and if you judge someone for it it’s prejudice.

            this is about men not doing shit about the patriarchy while at the same time painting themselves as the victims of it

            This right here, also Goomba Fallacy.

            • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Being born a man is a circumstance, and if you judge someone for it it’s prejudice.

              Being born a mansplainer who’s never read a feminist book is also a circumstance, one that you forced yourself into.

              if y’all hate being men so much, that’s also not a circumstance. your sex is mutable, and I’m telling you this as a trans woman