Summary

Elon Musk has requested access to the IRS’s Integrated Data Retrieval System, which contains personal tax information for millions of Americans.

The request has not yet been granted but has raised alarm among privacy experts and government officials.

Critics fear Musk could misuse the data, especially given his existing federal contracts. The IRS is considering a memorandum to permit access, despite strict rules against unauthorized viewing.

A federal judge has already blocked DOGE from accessing Treasury data, but other agencies remain vulnerable.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Theoretically (not wasteful spending, but corruption) - by noticing unexplainable incomes of government employees and relatives of those and politicians and their relatives. In practice - I don’t think they can be caught this easily.

      Also it is a huge dataset from which one can have some insights on how to, well, optimize taxes and tax returns for whatever goal one wishes.

      In practice others have already answered that.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think he should get access to it.

    I think everyone should get access to it.

    That’s how we do it in Scandinavia. It’s been good for fighting corruption.

    If your neighbour has a brand new Lamborghini in his driveway, while filling an income of 20k€ the last year. Maybe ask the IRS to look a bit closer at his finances.

    I use it to see how much my colleagues make, so I have a leg to stand on in salary negotiations.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s not how it works here… Don’t pretend and welcome his horseshit. This is probably about making a personal enemies list

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 days ago

      In a fair democracy, sure. But the US ain’t that; I wouldn’t be surprised if they used donation write-offs to target political opponents.

      • ehoff121@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Political donations are generally not tax deductible so wouldn’t show up on the returns.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      The only way the Trump administration is going to do anything about people cheating on their taxes is to pardon them for it.

    • krimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also very convenient for criminals to target wealthy people and scam or rob them?

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You know what’s even more convenient?

        Scammers from poorer countries just targeting the elderly and retired in richer countries. You know, like they currently do.

        What’s with the fear mongering about a system that’s been shown to reduce corruption? Do you like corruption? Do you like people cheating the benefits system?

      • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Good point: a lot of theft stems from people reading tax returns and robbing the rich. That’s why high-income neighborhoods also have the highest crime 🙄

      • Blinsane@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        The same argument that’s been parroted by right wing parties here for decades. However it doesn’t really mesh well with reality. Not that right wing parties ever really cared about reality.

  • Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    They are worming their way through the various departments looking for something…dirt on their opponents?

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 days ago

      Probably dirt on everyone. And just to farm for their own purposes. Collate all the federal data, pump it into his grok LLM, and try to create his own file on every consumer.

      • einlander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 days ago

        AI generated dossiers, terrifying. Imagine all the crimes the AI can hallucinate a person did. And with generative audiovisual AI can manufacturer the evidence.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think it’s about that, even Musk isn’t this dumb. It’s about AI-generated individual profiles for propaganda and surveillance. One can play a person having studied them well enough. And turns out that of this LLMs are capable.

          • einlander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            While Elon might not do this, he has lackeys that aren’t scrupled. And maybe Trump has a meddlesome priest he wants Elon to take away. I’m not very optimistic about the current regime.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              What you said is a subset of what I said, so I didn’t say you were wrong, just that it’s not everything. Point being, I said I think it’s worse. Didn’t sleep well, so my grammar is atrocious.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Right, propaganda had to be aimed at the average citizen, or at least the average citizen of a few major groups or layers. A huge headache. With enough data one can have personalized propaganda.

        It’s only the Web and customer UI\UX which are now “one size fits all” and becoming worse, with things really important for these companies they are doing their job properly.

        I mean, that’s where it was always going, since “big data” was a new buzzword, and neural nets were something only geeks cared about, with no commercial hype visible. When Bitcoin seemed a new anarchist (right anarchism is still that) thing, and The Silk Road was operational.

        Why - because it was about advertising and insights for companies about customers, and also about creating a non-neutral medium from a social network, or in our current existence from the Web itself. A non-neutral medium is where your messages get effectively lost or amplified or distorted, depending on some policy.

        You as a customer or a user don’t need that to make your choice with whom to talk or what to buy. These destinations are all real, and thus a social media company doesn’t need any information to “create” them. If they are distorting them, then they are distorting your own choices. They are stealing from you, in fact. This is violence and was always going towards the sad state of affairs we have now.

        And I think it’s worse than what people say about “fascism” or “cronyism” or whatever.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    He wants to live like common people. He wants to see whatever common people see.

    — he’s never paid any tax, so he obviously wants to live vicariously with the eyes of the poors. Not as one though, just wants to get closer to understanding them by looking at their tax returns, illegally.

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      All Americans should have their credit frozen in general. You can unfreeze it any time you want to make a big finance decision like a mortgage but there’s no reason to just leave it out there the rest of the time.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        That ads friction to the economy, which is why credit was invented.

        If we all just started a grassroots campaign in which EVERYONE freezes their credit in March, it will not be awesome for banks.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            It would slow down spending in the economy simply by being a slight barrier to people getting new credit cards or buying new things. Large banks are also credit card servicers, so they would see direct impacts.

      • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        The thing that makes me hesitant about a freeze is losing the code somehow. Not sure what to do if that happens.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      AI-powered audits on “everyone”, but the source code and weights will be secret and it’ll disproportionately target liberals.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    Great, I’m about to get audited by the billionaire that probably doesn’t pay taxes. Lovely.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      inadvertently

      I think their ideology, despite a set of religious beliefs, is about exactly what’s happening without this word you used.