lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-29 days agoIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down163file-text
arrow-up1309arrow-down1imageIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orglambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-29 days agomessage-square187fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareThiakil@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoIndeed, that’s correct ula usage, but shouldn’t need nat rewriting. The global prefixes just need to be advertised by RA packets
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 days agoYeah I’m not using NAT, sorry for the confusion. My router doesn’t support RAs for a ULA range though, so I’m running radvd on my home server.
minus-squareThiakil@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoI use openwrt on my home network which uses dnsmasq for dhcp. It can give a static suffix which just works with the global prefix on the interface and the site local / ula prefix it uses
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoNote that Android doesn’t support DHCPv6, just in case you have Android devices and ever have to debug IPv6 on them.
minus-squareThiakil@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoYup indeed. That’s why it advertises both dhcp and slaac
Indeed, that’s correct ula usage, but shouldn’t need nat rewriting. The global prefixes just need to be advertised by RA packets
Yeah I’m not using NAT, sorry for the confusion.
My router doesn’t support RAs for a ULA range though, so I’m running radvd on my home server.
I use openwrt on my home network which uses dnsmasq for dhcp. It can give a static suffix which just works with the global prefix on the interface and the site local / ula prefix it uses
Note that Android doesn’t support DHCPv6, just in case you have Android devices and ever have to debug IPv6 on them.
Yup indeed. That’s why it advertises both dhcp and slaac