Optional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 18 hours agoMissed it by that muchlemmy.worldimagemessage-square267fedilinkarrow-up1986arrow-down131
arrow-up1955arrow-down1imageMissed it by that muchlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 18 hours agomessage-square267fedilink
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·16 hours agoSounds like we need to run someone some of those 36% would be willing to vote for. Voting against the other isn’t working anymore.
minus-squarebutwhyishischinabook@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·15 hours agoNo. The answer was even more centrists and shitting on progressives even harder. Don’t worry, it’ll definitely work next election, trust me.
minus-squarecool@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·edit-211 hours agoI totally agree, but that someone would have to be a champion of the working class. Unfortunately, even on the left there are plenty of greedy, entitled assholes that will never support a candidate that threatens their wealth. It’s why they didn’t nominate Bernie, twice. They’d rather have trump.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 hours agoI’d argue none of them are actually on the left.
Sounds like we need to run someone some of those 36% would be willing to vote for. Voting against the other isn’t working anymore.
No. The answer was even more centrists and shitting on progressives even harder. Don’t worry, it’ll definitely work next election, trust me.
I totally agree, but that someone would have to be a champion of the working class.
Unfortunately, even on the left there are plenty of greedy, entitled assholes that will never support a candidate that threatens their wealth.
It’s why they didn’t nominate Bernie, twice. They’d rather have trump.
I’d argue none of them are actually on the left.