• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And all we get in return are chat systems that make up bullshit facts. I mean, I don’t disagree that they can actually do some useful stuff, too. But the proportion of the public that benefits from them in any meaningful way is tiny compared to the cost to the rest of us. I hope a tornado lands on Elon’s gas-powered monstrosity in, where, Tennessee, I think? Destroy that shit, please.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unlike this place, I bet most people out there actually enjoy Google’s AI summaries. I mean, it’s almost the Wikipedia article verbatim, but if you just need to know what a thing is, they actually save people time

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Our culture disintegrates every time we choose convenience over everything.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Wao, I watched this video yester, precisely about how detrimental all this bullshit is to us right now. How disconnected from reality and self-reliance it is making us.

          Here’s the link to the video if anyone is interested (yes, I know, it’s YouTube, but I saw it in newpipe, Sue me) :

          https://youtu.be/KkR5OXhKnbc

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        And in return, they drive traffic away from the sites that collect the information in the first place, causing the sources to lose revenue.

          • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It saves them money in the same sense it saves every other information source money, it reduces traffic. But just like other sites can’t serve ads without traffic, Wikipedia can’t prove its worth and ask for donations without traffic. Eventually, people will start asking themselves why they need to support Wikipedia when Google’s AI tells them everything they need to know, unaware that Google’s AI can only do so because it scrapes Wikipedia without paying for it.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          They have driven traffic away from the websites, not from Google itself

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Considering Google has the worst AI in the entire industry I wouldn’t be surprised if this was true. This is Google’s Siri moment.

      • Lucelu2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is not like I did not have access to that information before. I don’t need to be trapped in some closed browser environment labeled as “search”

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You had to look at all the results yourself before getting to the thing you wanted. Similarly, before search engines existed you could just find the information by directly accessing the website