• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dumbledore is the single most powerful wizard know, and the most influential in magical Britian. He runs a school where he is beloved by nearly everyone. If he wanted to change things, he easily could have done more. Especially since Fudge wasn’t very powerful and had to deal with an entire bureaucracy. Direct change at the school itself would have been feasible.

    And while the parents might have threatened to remove their students, they weren’t really. Where else are they going to send their kids to get educated? There are other schools but the culture difference was so stark that seems unlikely.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Dumbledore got kicked out in Chamber of Secrets by the governors. If he started implementing more radical progressive changes, that would happen on an even quicker timeline.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s like saying “Dumbledore had the biggest assault rifle of anyone, so he can do anything”.

      Sure he was a powerful duelist, but a group of others could take him down.

      So, setting the “power” aside, he has 2 choices:

      1. Operate within the system and bureaucracy to effect change via normal political motion

      2. Use non combat magic to manipulate others, (time travel, invisibility, foresight) effectively hoping to be a benevolent authoritarian

      If he goes with 1, he has to maintain favor. You can see how tenuous that is, with his favor slipping during the unrest. The parents wouldn’t take their kids out of Hogwarts long term, they’d kick.dumbledore out instead.

      For the most part it’s feasible that he could have made more direct changes to the school, yes. Good point.