• GojuRyu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s like a clicker game but with scrolling and depression. I’ve attempted to get all the way through it multiple times, but never succeeded.

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Man, that graph and website is amazing. Simple, but gets the point across. I’ll share it from time to time.

    • DeviantOvary@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know several (low) millionaires and none of them exploited other people’s hard work. All of them are self-employed, and one of them is the single employee of their company.

      Billionaires on the other hand. Yep, no way to get to a billion without heavy exploitation and sociopathic behavior.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I know several (low) millionaires and none of them exploited other people’s hard work.

        checks under the hood

        Where’d you, uh… where’d you get all that compound interest on your investments from?

        All of them are self-employed, and one of them is the single employee of their company.

        “I’ve never exploited anyone!”

        “Oh really, what do you do for a living?”

        “Insurance defense lawyer.”

        • DeviantOvary@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          One of them is a self-employed pentester, they’re very good at it. Pure income. The others are soft devs with their own product.

          You can always move the goal post and say their clients are exploiting their employees, but we can keep moving it even further and claim that anyone who lives under capitalism exploits someone else down the line.

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’ve started with the premise that making money is evil, and are working backward from there.

          “Oh no, you invested in index funds!!!” - yeah, so does everybody via their 401k or pension.

          “Oh no, the work you did had any negative impact at all!!!” - thats basically every job. Communist agitators pollute the environment by driving cars to protests, and vegans kill field mice in their fields of soybeans. There are plenty of ways to make money that make the world better on net.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’ve started with the premise that making money is evil

            The monetary system is a miserable way to justify homelessness, neglect, and poverty, sure.

            thats basically every job.

            The fact that you can’t imagine a job that improves the lives if your friends and neighbors is kinda bleak.

            • blarghly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You seem to be acting intentionally dense to avoid changing your mind, so I’m going to stop responding.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most, sure, but Europe, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and more are still a significant part of the world where $1M puts you firmly in the same “well-off and comfortable, but certainly not rich in the way billionaires are” territory you’d be in the US

        Worldwide, I think it’s definitely safe to say most millionaires’ lifestyles are much closer to average than they are to billionaires’ (ie still having to make regular payments for housing, but mortgage rather than rent, and still having to perform most tasks for themselves rather than having PAs to do it for them)

        • Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you have $1m, you can draw something like $30-40000 a year reasonably safely. That’s obviously a lot of money, but isn’t what most people in the mentioned countries think of as “living large” if it’s your whole income, especially for a couple/family. That puts you at about the median individual income for Japan and NZ, a bit above in Korea, and below for most of western Europe and Aus.

          Obviously that’s without working, but that’s kinda the point. It’s wealth, but not enough that most people in those places would be comfortable not working if that’s how much they earned. Hell, in the US that wouldn’t even cover childcare for a few kids in many locales.

          • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The $1m isn’t in cash… You forget that the average house price in London is around $900k, and for Sydney it’s $981k.

            That means your pool for your car, furnishings, investments etc. are either minimal, or you have a mortgage, and definitely can’t live passively off $30-40k per year unless you’re living in cheaper than average housing (one would call this “not super wealthy”) and definitely not if you’re supporting a family.

            I’m not saying the cost of living isn’t worse in the US, just that $1m is a comparatively tiny amount everywhere and that most millionaires (as there will a correlation between net worth and frequency) are frankly closer to the working class than they are to billionaires.

            • Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              None of what I said is disagreeing with your point. You’re reading into my response opposition that wasn’t offered.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sometimes you have rich parents. Sometimes you have friends with rich parents. Sometimes you just find yourself at the center of a CIA money laundering operation.

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It is easy to get rich, as long as you have the moral compass of a cactus.

    First I’d code some malware that specifically targets old people to try to scam them out of money. With that money I’d short out companies on the brink of going bankrupt and help by doing things that cost them money but aren’t technically illegal. With that money I’d start my own business selling crap bought from overseas, with students I can underpay, so I exploit both my customers and my workforce. Then with that money I’d bribe politicians to give me tax breaks.

    There, now I am a multi millionaire.

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sad but true that some people’s need for success, money, and power allows them to rationalize their complete disregard for basic morality.

  • BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When it comes to new technologies, advancements, or discoveries, rarely is it the people who made them that get most of the profit made from them, the people that make the most are the ones that exploited them. It’s crazy that our best and brightest are more times than not indentured to our most greedy.

    There needs to be laws and regulation to prevent and stop excessive greed and exploitation.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Henry Ford still underpaid people for their labor. That is the fundamental key to capitalism. Profit is surplus labor that capitalists steal from laborers.