Background: 15 years of experience in software and apparently spoiled because it was already set up correctly.

Been practicing doing my own servers, published a test site and 24 hours later, root was compromised.

Rolled back to the backup before I made it public and now I have a security checklist.

  • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’ve gotta say this post made me appreciate switching to lemmy. This post is actually helpful for the poor sap that didn’t know better, instead of pure salt like another site I won’t mention.

    • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I shared it because, out there, there is a junior engineer experiencing severe imposter syndrome. And here I am, someone who has successfully delivered applications with millions of users and advanced to leadership roles within the tech industry, who overlook basic security principles.

      We all make mistakes!

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        There’s a 40 year I.T. veteran here that still suffers imposter syndrome. It’s a real thing I’ve never been able to shake off

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Just look at who is in the White House, mate - and not just the president, but basically you can pick anyone he’s hand-picked for his staff.

          Surely that’s an instant cure for any qualified person feeling imposter syndrome in their job.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Lol you can actually demo a github compromise in real time to an audience.

    Make a repo with an API key, publish it, and literally just watch as it takes only a few minutes before a script logs in.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        –verbose please?

        edit: never mind, found it. So there’s dumbasses storing sensitive data (keys!) inside their git folder and unable to configure .gitignore…

          • lunachocken@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I always start with .gitignore and adding the .env then making it.

            Anywho, there’s git filter-repo which is quite nice and retconned some of my repos for some minor things out of existence :P

  • Punkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Basic setup for me is scripted on a new system. In regards to ssh, I make sure:

    • Root account is disabled, sudo only
    • ssh only by keys
    • sshd blocks all users but a few, via AllowUsers
    • All ‘default usernames’ are removed, like ec2-user or ubuntu for AWS ec2 systems
    • The default ssh port moved if ssh has to be exposed to the Internet. No, this doesn’t make it “more secure” but damn, it reduces the script denials in my system logs, fight me.
    • Services are only allowed connections by an allow list of IPs or subnets. Internal, when possible.

    My systems are not “unhackable” but not low-hanging fruit, either. I assume everything I have out there can be hacked by someone SUPER determined, and have a vector of protection to mitigate backwash in case they gain full access.

    • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago
      • The default ssh port moved if ssh has to be exposed to the Internet. No, this doesn’t make it “more secure” but damn, it reduces the script denials in my system logs, fight me.

      Gosh I get unreasonably frustrated when someone says yeah but that’s just security through obscurity. Like yeah, we all know what nmap is, a persistent threat will just look at all 65535 and figure out where ssh is listening… But if you change your threat model and talk about bots? Logs are much cleaner and moving ports gets rid of a lot of traffic. Obviously so does enabling keys only.

      Also does anyone still port knock these days?

  • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    On a new linux install or image I will always:

    • Make new users(s)
    • Setup new user to sudo
    • Change ssh port
    • Change new user to authenticate ssh via key+password
    • Disable root ssh login
    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s more or less the advice I’ve gotten as well. I’ve also read good things about fail2ban which tries to ban sources of repeated authentication failures to prevent brute force password attempts. I’ve used it, but the only person who has managed to get banned is myself! I did get back in after the delay, but I’m happy to know it works.

    • stebator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago
      • Setup new user to sudo

      I hope it is not a passwordless sudo, it is basically the same as root.

  • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    As a linux n00b who just recently took the plunge and set up a public site (tho really just for my own / selfhosting),

    Can anyone recommend a good guide or starting place for how to harden the setup? Im running mint on my former gaming rig, site is set up LAMP

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    One time, I didn’t realize I had allowed all users to log in via ssh, and I had a user “steam” whose password was just “steam”.

    “Hey, why is this Valheim server running like shit?”

    “Wtf is xrx?”

    “Oh, it looks like it’s mining crypto. Cool. Welp, gotta nuke this whole box now.”

    So anyway, now I use NixOS.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      If it’s public facing, how about dont turn on ssh to the public, open it to select ips or ranges. Use a non standard port, use a cert or even a radius with TOTP like privacyIdea. How about a port knocker to open the non standard port as well. Autoban to lock out source ips.

      That’s just off the top of my head.

      There’s a lot you can do to harden a host.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m confused. I never disable root user and never got hacked.

    Is the issue that the app is coded in a shitty way maybe ?

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      You can’t really disable it anyway.

      Hardening is mostly prevent root login from outside in case every other layer of authentication and access control broke, do not allow regular user to su/sudo into it for free, and have a tight grip on anything that’s executable and have a setuid bit set. I did not install a system from scratch in a long time but I believe this would be the default on most things that are not geared toward end-user devices, too.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      You can’t really disable the root user. You can make it so they can’t login remotely, which is highly suggested.

        • Xanza@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          There’s no real advantage to disable the root user, and I really don’t recommend it. You can disable SSH root login, and as long as you ensure root has a secure password that’s different than your own account your system is just as safe with the added advantage of having the root account incase something happens.