• Slyke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Cool. I noticed that it only mentions convicted, pending conviction, or other immigration violations. It doesn’t mention those that have no issues? Or is that what other immigration violations are (like visa over stayers etc).

    • javiwhite@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah that was my first thought too.

      Haven’t there been cases of legal US citizens being detained by ICE? Surely they wouldn’t fit into any of those categories…

      • Slyke@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Exactly. While the number is probably small relatively speaking, hiding it isn’t a good look.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well, they have to be accused of something to be detained. Immigration violations of some types don’t get a court hearing to be “convicted” of those violations by a judge by default.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well, they have to be accused of something to be detained.

        Doesn’t seem to be true anymore.