• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: January 13th, 2025

help-circle
  • Not OP, but for me the issue is if you want to override the default and make it opt-out, especially sine the opt-out process isn’t that well documented, then you should realize that support is a necessary part of that process and fix problems as they arise rather than resorting to name calling and hostile behavior when something you published is broken. It’s a responsibility of taking on that kind of project. Either that or make it explicitly opt-in and give users a warning like with beta version opt-in notifications that the packages are not official and issues may not be fixed as quickly as the official releases.


  • Because with stores, the evidence would be missing products. Very easy to see. With bugs like this, a million people could have abused it, or one. Either way that data is likely available to all who want it.

    A better comparison is, store posted list of their customer’s addresses on the back door. No clue how many people walked by there much less if anyone copied it down.

    Problem is that knowing the link between a person’s profile and their email now means you know the link between their account and their accounts in many other places. That information could be used to offer the person different prices at stores, attack them for being a minority or activist, to hack their account because their password was leaked from another site that uses that email,or all the other things these cumulative leaks add up to.





  • It’s not a private messaging platform, it’s an anti-censorship messaging platform among other things. If you’re looking for privacy, this probably isn’t the application for that. Though it is somewhat possible to make it more private, that’s not the primary use case. If you’re looking for a platform for public conversations where corporate interests of the day won’t cause your messages to be censored, then Matrix might be useful. But moderation of spam, hate content, etc., is also not going to be robust in general.


  • Apple hardware is good, but not priced at the same quality to price ratio because there’s no competition. You can get other brands with higher quality at the same price point that better supported by Linux.

    I think that was the point there. Not that Apple has bad hardware, but lack of competition and the premium for the product family mean you can get higher specs per dollar with many other manufacturers and you can find hardware that won’t require “jailbreaking” or other workarounds or missing drivers to get it working with Linux.