StuartLemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 3 days ago

New York clerk again refuses to enforce Texas judgment against doctor who provided abortion pills

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
102
fedilink
630
external-link

New York clerk again refuses to enforce Texas judgment against doctor who provided abortion pills

apnews.com

Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 3 days ago
message-square
102
fedilink
A New York county clerk has again refused to file a more than $100,000 civil judgment from Texas against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills.
  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    it’s only a matter of time before the supreme court forces new york to comply; i hope that the doctor is prepared for this and finds another way to help with protecting themself.

    when slavery was a thing, the shitty laws from shitty states to reclaim escaped slaves took primacy over laws from abolitionist states that would have protected them due to the supreme court and it took a war to overcome it.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      i hope that the doctor is prepared for this and finds another way to help with protecting themself.

      The airport code is YYZ but driving up from Buffalo is cool too.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The US Supreme Court can’t currently do what you say without a law change at the federal level.

      Also, the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery (mostly) was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865 after the end of the US Civil War.

      • redhat421@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do you think the actual law matters to the Supreme Court? They act more like priests now.

        • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The supreme court wants some pretence of law otherwise their cushy jobs might be at risk. It’s why the somewhat push back on Trump

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I didn’t think about what matters to SCOTUS at all.

          The law still matters to people and that’s what’s important. Only after we, abandon the rule of law will there be a complete breakdown of society and a descent into chaos and anarchy.

          I know from all the doom posting I see on Lemmy that many don’t, but I still have hope.

          • andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            We’ve been literally dismantling the first amendment (Establishment clause particularly). And the fourteenth (the whole fucking thing by EO).

            • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I know from all the doom posting I see on Lemmy that many don’t, but I still have hope.

      • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Regarding your second paragraph:

        Uh, yeah, that doesn’t contradict what they said. They were referring to free states which had abolished slavery at the state level, which were forced by federal law to help southern states reclaim slaves that escaped north. It has nothing to do with the 13th Amendment.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          And the Supreme Court of the United States rules based on federal law which, prior to the 13th, meant that under federal law slavery was not illegal and slaves were still considered property.

          It’s why the civil war was fought and then the amendment was passed. The victor makes the rules and since the United States beat the Confederate States, they made the rules.

          It’s not even an equal comparison, particularly because of the precedent set in Dobbs by SCOTUS establishing abortion protections as a state issue.

          the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision upholding Mississippi’s law and overturning Roe v. Wade. With that ruling, the Court returned lawmaking decisions about abortion to the states.

          • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Removed by mod

            • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              That’s… not how laws in the US work. I take it you’re not familiar with the maxim “everything which is not forbidden is allowed”. Abortion was never legalized by federal law in the US either yet they were still being performed.

              The federal law protects states rights until the federal law directly overwrites it

              Not exactly. State laws can be as, or more restrictive, than federal laws but they cannot be less. This means that if the federal government doesn’t restrict it then states can be as restrictive as they want, as long as those restrictions aren’t in opposition to existing federal laws.

              Slavery wasn’t federally legalized

              Well…

              Slavery was legally practiced across America (the United States ) until its federal abolition in 1865.

              Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 prohibited Congress from banning the importation of slaves for twenty years, effectively allowing the international slave trade to continue until 1808

              In 1807, Congress passed the Act Prohibiting the Importation of Slaves, taking effect on January 1, 1808. This intended to end transatlantic slave trade, but it didn’t abolish slavery or domestic sale of enslaved people within the US.

              The Fugitive Slave Act or Fugitive Slave Law was a law passed by the 31st United States Congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the Compromise of 1850 between Southern interests in slavery and Northern Free-Soilers.

              This is all in any decent history about slavery in the US. In fact, slavery is still not completely illegal in the US. Remember the 13th amendment? It formally abolished slavery and involuntary servitude in the US, except as a punishment for a crime.

              • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Removed by mod

                • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion, based on the right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment

                  the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision upholding Mississippi’s law and overturning Roe v. Wade. With that ruling, the Court returned lawmaking decisions about abortion to the states.

                  The Roe decision folded abortion into the 14th Amendment until it was overturned in Dobbs returning legislation over it to the states.

                  That other stuff is fair, I’m simply saying that you should have started with that. Fair?

                  If you don’t know what you are talking about then maybe you should not chime in and research the issue instead. This is all basic American history. Honestly, spoon feeding you things you could learn yourself to correct your wrongly made statements is exhausting. It’s time for me to block you and move on.

                  • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    Removed by mod

                  • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    Removed by mod

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.34K users / day
  • 7.36K users / week
  • 13.4K users / month
  • 30.6K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31K subscribers
  • 7.08K Posts
  • 134K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org