• Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason conservatives win anything is because of lines on a fucking map. No one likes that shit

      • Umbra@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both parties are gerrymandering as much as they can get away with. If you meant the electoral college that’s part of being a federation of states, sorry. Changing the rules to benefit your team is not exactly fair either, right?

        • Saneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fuck the teams. What’s my team? I’m an independent. I’ve never once been registered in a party in my decades of voting. Knock off the team bullshit. It’s how idiots think

          It would be nice if 40-45% of the country didn’t try to force the other 60% to live by their rules.

          • Umbra@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would be nice if the majority doesn’t force the minority to live by their rules either.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So instead you allow a crazy ass minority most people don’t agree with to do the same thing. How convenient for you.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the number of electors was distributed in a way that didn’t give disproportional representation to states with very small populations, that would be great. Also, the notion that the US is truly a federation of independent states hasn’t been accurate for at least 200 years.

          • Umbra@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a bit disproportional for a few states but then again, you can say the votes of people in Wyoming are worth more relatively speaking but it’s still just 3 electors in the end. No one will pay much attention to them either way, unlike the more populous states which can swing elections.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              unlike the more populous states which can swing elections.

              You say that like it’s a bad thing for people to be in charge rather than arbitrary lines drawn on maps.

              • Umbra@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m saying they don’t matter with their 3 votes, I don’t think the people there feel very important in deciding the presidential election.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, that’s a straight up lie. Multiple blue states have independent commissions that draw the maps, meanwhile red states refuse to allow even that.

          I’m sick of fascists trying to gaslight people into believing that everyone is the same as they are. You’re a blatant liar.